Service Year Comparison 2004/5 - 2005/6

by TheListener 10 Replies latest jw friends

  • TheListener
    TheListener

    I apologize but I posted this on another thread and then decided it really deserved its own thread. Yes, I know that is only my opinion but what else have I to go on?

    Thanks to a pm someone sent me we can now compare 10 months of the current service year to last year's service report. thank you so much for the pm.

    2005-2006 service year
    MonthPubs.Bptz
    Sep-051,001,5831,612
    Oct-05997,7142,152
    Nov-05989,5432,683
    Dec-051,008,9051,635
    Jan-061,001,1501,534
    Feb-061,001,4691,109
    Mar-061,010,8681,589
    Apr-061,008,9672,609
    May-061,011,5242,478
    Jun-06995,6392,864
    Jul-06
    Aug-06
    Avg.1,002,7362,027
    Total20,265
    2004-2005 service year
    MonthPubls.Bptz
    Sep-04990,5511,791
    Oct-04993,4762,680
    Nov-04990,0862,331
    Dec-04997,2501,923
    Jan-05990,3651,419
    Feb-05984,7471,441
    Mar-05992,7322,056
    Apr-051,004,3102,543
    May-05991,4502,009
    Jun-05973,7102,737
    Jul-05996,3685,323
    Aug-051,035,0822,126
    Avg.995,0112,365
    Total28,379

    What do we see?

    A couple things:

    1. In august of 2005 there was a major jump in the number of publishers reporting. Hmmm, sounds suspiciously like a "get out the vote" campaign. Notice that in September 2005 (the first month of the following service year) the number dropped some 34,000.

    2. With only two months to go they are only averaging about 7,000 more than last year. Of course, with the sudden surge of publishers that happens every August we'll see that average raise somewhat.

    3. The average baptisms are down. They need to baptize about 8,000 people in July and August to meet the same growth rate as last year. The growth rate was less than 1% last year and showed as 0% in the yearly report. They may just make getting a 0% again or maybe just maybe get a -1%. That would be an exciting announcement. And yes, you are correct July and August occur during prime District Convention months so the number of baptisms should increase dramatically. Even with that, by reviewing previous years, there isn't a precedent that could find in recent years (post 1995) where 8,000 individuals were baptized in two consecutive months. We'll see.

    I don't see the society posting any huge gains and dramatic successes this year. Am I missing something?

  • sspo
    sspo

    You're not missing anything, we all know that those that are getting baptized are primarily young one, 10-15 years of age, at that age it is more to please the parents than a true dedication to God.

    With all the preaching work going on, millions of devoted hrs., there is very little increase.

  • Joker10
    Joker10

    I don't see the society posting any huge gains and dramatic successes this year. Am I missing something?

    Yes.

    Publishers were up by 21,929, or 2.3%, in June- the highest gain for any month so far. They almost reported one million on a month that historically reports the lowest.

    Compared to the samemonths last year, they are up by 12,000.

  • Jim_TX
    Jim_TX
    Am I missing something?

    Yes. This next year, they are going to buy better software that will allow them to use decimal points. This will let them show gains of 0.3% or 0.5% rather than having to show them as 0%.

    Regards,

    Jim TX

    (P.S. Just making it up... don't have a clue.)

  • seawolf
    seawolf
    With all the preaching work going on, millions of devoted hrs., there is very little increase.

    With all the hours, on average, that have to be spent per person baptized, it's amazing how much time is wasted. I know where I'm at they seem to bring one new one in about every five years, and those seem to not last too long before they split and leave.

  • Zico
    Zico

    Obviously more of the current publishers are now reporting, but they're getting less baptisms, which is the main thing.

    Last year they had an average of 995,000ish publishers, but only managed 28,000 baptisms. That's only 2.8% of publishers who manage to 'help' someone on to baptism, and most of them are kids!

  • Check_Your_Premises
    Check_Your_Premises

    Listener,

    Sept 04 to June 05 shows 20,930 baptized.

    Sept 05 to June 06 shows 20,265 baptized.

    100% - (20265/20930)*100 = -3.18% growth in baptized

    (did I do that right?)

    CYP

  • Check_Your_Premises
    Check_Your_Premises

    by the same reckoning the number of pubs will increase by about 1%...

  • Check_Your_Premises
    Check_Your_Premises

    has anyone done any comparisons of number publishers and number baptized side by side.

    I figure the number baptized would lag the number of publishers by a year or so.

    CYP

  • sir82
    sir82

    Of course, comparing "baptisms" to "number of publishers reporting" is a bit of apples & oranges comparing, but there is a definite correlation.

    Most typically, a person is an "unbaptized publisher" for only a year or so, sometimes less, sometimes more (in the case of young children). But in general, it's probably reasonable to assume that there is a constant "one year lag" between when a person first reports field service, vs. when he is baptized.

    I find it interesting that 28,000 were baptized in the past service year, but the average number of publishers only increased by 7000 this year. I.e., 21,000 stopped publishing in the past year.

    If we assume a 1% mortality rate, that would mean that about 10,000 JWs died. Meaning about 11,000 were either D-F'ed, disassociated, or became inactive.

    So for every 28 persons beginning to preach, 10 persons die and 11 quit or are "fired". Not a very spectacular "growth report"!

    And it seems that the number of baptisms is continuing to decline. I'd make a wager that the number of deaths and DF / DA / inactives will not be decreasing any time soon....it's just a matter of time until the "growth rate" becomes negative.

    And what's even more staggering is that 1/4 of the JWs in the US are in Spanish-speaking congregations, where the growth is far more robust. They are hemorraging English-speaking members (i.e. the wealthier ones) at an alarming rate, and seem to have no clue how to stop it, other than continuing the beatings.

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit