Hi religious person,
I will try to answer some of your questions. Some in the list of ten are presented as couplets, so in some cases I will take them two at a time.
1. Science eventually holds the answers to all questions of life.
2. Anyone who does not believe Rule #1 is unscientific.
Your term "questions of life" is ambiguous. Are you referring to all questions that humans entertain in their head? The answer is no. Science can not address concepts that are beyond the natural world. Science does not say anything about whether there is a God or not, or whether there is some spiritual after life somewhere beyond our universe.
If your term "all questions of life" refers to the make up of life and it's history, then yes science is the only avenue for answering such questions.
3. Any evidence for intelligent design of the universe is not scientific evidence.
4. Any person who theaches there is evidence for intelligent design of the universe is not scientific.
Science can not answer the question as to whether there is or is not intelligent design. That is the realm of philosophy and religion. Science can give a relatively good explaination of when life began and how it evolved over time. Whether there is a designer behind it, can not be answered.
5. Scientists know tfor a fact that matter is all there is.
6. Anything that is not matter does not matter.
Energy also exists, but I am sure that that was not the thrust of your question. Science can not explore anything that someone posits to exist but can't be measured. If you tell me that you have an invisible soul, well that's nice and you can beleive it if you want, but it can't be proved or disproved. If you told me you had a past life, that can't be proved either. It is a nice, romantic notion but it is not subject to investigation. I suppose that is why religions are so varied and colorful. People can dream up all kinds of possibilities.
7. Religions or religious impulse is the result of undesirable mutations in biological matter.
I have never heard such a theory proposed by scientists. To get an understanding of what scientists say regarding religion, you should read an introductory text in Sociology and one in Social Psychology.
8. Whatever is not science is religion.
I assume you are asking this question as it relates to epistimology. Philosophy should be included as well, which is distinctly different than religion.
9. Only science should be taught.
No, philosophy and comparative religion would be useful areas of study.
10. Stuff happens but only by coinicidence.
Stuff happens based on cause-effect lawful relationships. A very large number of these relationships in chemistry and physics are known.
