Received letter from wtbs re Vicki Boer

by Gadget 77 Replies latest jw friends

  • Gadget
    Gadget

    I got 2 replies to my letters this morning. One was from my local MP saying he had passed my letter to another minister and the Foreign and Commonwealth Office are investigating to see if its an appropriate issue to raise, and the other was from the WBTS of Britain. The letter reads as below, and I would appreciate your comments on it, and some good qoutes to include in a reply.

    Dear Mr xxxxxx

    This will acknowledge receipt of your letter 2 October 2003 regarding Victoria Boer. Her sad case was heard by a court in Canada. Like you, the only information we have on the Court's decision to award legal costs is what we have read in media reports.

    If these reports are accurate it would seem that Victoria Boer refused an out of court settlement amounting to four times the sum she was eventually awarded in damages. The media reports appear to show that her failure to accept an out of court settlement meant that under Canadian law the Court was obliged to award costs against her.

    Even if, regrettably, on isolated occasions allegations of child molestation might not have been handled with appropriate sensitivity and understanding, our unequivocal abhorrence of child abuse, our sympathy for victims and our desire to protect children from such heinous acts has been a matter of public record for many years.

    We send our Christian good wishes.

    Yours sincerely

    WatchTower B & T Society of Britain

  • shamus
    shamus

    BULLSHIT.

    "Children of god", my ass.

  • sens
    sens

    OMG

  • shamus
    shamus

    Is it possible for you to scan the letter? Just put white pieces of paper over any identification that you may have on the letter.

    It is loud and clear what they are doing. Anyone with abuse cases, don't come after us, or you'll pay! Do you have to be deaf, dumb and blind to figure this one out?

    WHY THE HELL AREN'T PEOPLE NOTICING?

  • Perry
    Perry
    The media reports appear to show that her failure to accept an out of court settlement meant that under Canadian law the Court was obliged to award costs against her.

    That is so misleading. The court had to be petitioned for this..... no one was obliged.

  • Gadget
    Gadget
    That is so misleading. The court had to be petitioned for this..... no one was obliged.

    Thanks perry, thats the sort of thing I want to know about to include in my reply. And I can scan the letter tonight, and email a copy if anybody wants one, or upload it to someones site if they can send me instructions..............................

  • Lainey
    Lainey

    Gadget I just called Cassie at work,

    He interested in who wrote the letter, does it have the symbols on the top

    Example SCA/SDE

    Can you let us know if there are any, also if they are missing that also means something according to him.

    Lainey

  • Gadget
    Gadget
    On the top of the letter it has the standard letterhead(Centralised), then just below it - XXXXXXXXXXXXXX- This is also centralised. Then there is my name and address on the left margin, then the body of the letter as I retyped it above. I hope this helps, and what does it mean?

    Gadget,

    If you wish to maintain your anonymity you'd be wise to remove those details from a public forum,

    As a point for the future folks, this is best left to private emails.

    Cheers, Ozzie

  • rocketman
    rocketman

    Thanks Gadget.

    Perry makes a great point - they had to petition for this.

  • hawkaw
    hawkaw

    Well, they are partly right in that letter. As usual the good old "lying by omission" tactics are in full play (and of course Jehovah God says Theocratic Warfare is okay to practice). They convienently left out the fact about the "gag" order, the second offer and of course they left out the fact that the Judge had discretion in s. 43.13 of the regulation.

    They also left out the fact that they had to ask for costs in order that the Judge would grant costs.

    I really hope this excerise is showing those who want to be JWs and those who are lurking just how evil this leadership is. Blaming it all on the Judge and showing all this sympathy for victims when the WTS's own lawyer had to ask for costs. Who was trying to to use the law to their advantage to get revenge here - eh Kenny boy?

    Yeah ... if some idiot in the WTS actually writes this letter in Canada and I get my hands on it ... I know the press will eat it up big time.

    hawk

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit