Does "Big Business" deny global warming and/or mankind's role in it?

by nvrgnbk 13 Replies latest jw friends

  • nvrgnbk
    nvrgnbk

    Top Businesses Demand Climate Action
    By SETH BORENSTEIN 11.30.07, 8:50 AM ET

    WASHINGTON -

    Some of the world's top business leaders are demanding that international diplomats meeting next week come up with drastic and urgent measures to cut greenhouse gas pollution at least in half by 2050.

    Officials from more than 150 global companies - worth nearly $4 trillion in market capitalization - have signed a petition urging "strong, early action on climate change" when political leaders meet in Indonesia.

    The hastily prepared petition drive, coordinated through the environmental office of Britain's Prince Charles, is signed by leaders from mainstream powerhouse companies such as Shell UK, GE International, Coca-Cola Co., Dupont Co., United Technologies Corp., Rolls Royce, Nestle SA, Unilever, British Airways and Volkswagen AG.

    The petition is aimed at the United Nations conference in Bali, convened to draft a new environmental treaty to replace the Kyoto accord, which expires in 2012.

    "We urge world leaders to seize this opportunity," the petition says.

    Contrary to the argument that mandatory pollution cuts would harm the economy, the business leaders' petition says ambitious emissions reductions would "create significant business opportunities."

    "You've got businesses around the world saying, 'Give us certainty so we can do what's right for our investors, society at large and the broader environment,'" said Richard Barrington, head of sustainability for Sun Microsystems in the United Kingdom and Ireland, whose boss signed the petition. "If you look at the risks associated with climate change, they're just as much business risks as they are human risks."

    In the three weeks that the business leaders circulated the petition, primarily in the United Kingdom, Europe, the United States and Australia, more than 80 percent of the giant firms contacted agreed to join in, said petition coordinator Craig Bennett, of the University of Cambridge's Programme for Industry.

    Just how drastic the cuts in man-made greenhouse gas emissions - carbon dioxide is the main one, generated mostly from the use of coal and oil products - should be left up to science, the business leaders said. But their communique refers to a recent international report on climate change, which said a 50 percent cut in emissions by 2050 is needed to prevent catastrophic global warming. Barrington said "that's the minimum order of what we're looking for."

    "It's a massive problem for humanity; it's a huge problem for our businesses," Bennett said. "The politicians have got to sit up and do something."

    In January, the CEO's of 10 major U.S. companies urged President Bush to support mandatory industrial greenhouse gas emission cuts. The White House is against that policy. Since their January plea, the industry group, the United States Climate Action Partnership, has grown to include 27 of the world's largest firms.

    Other companies signing the British-based petition include Nike Inc., Johnson & Johnson, Virgin Group, Barclays PLC, Gap, Nokia, Pacific Gas and Electric, and the Rupert Murdoch-owned News Corp., which runs the conservative Fox News Channel.

    "There are voices that you may not normally expect to be heard on this particular issue," Barrington said. "It just shows how concerned we are about the issue."

    Copyright 2007 Associated Press.

    http://www.forbes.com/feeds/ap/2007/11/30/ap4390693.html

  • changeling
    changeling

    Too deep dude...

    changeling

  • nvrgnbk
    nvrgnbk

    Too deep dude...

    changeling

    Not at all.

  • brinjen
    brinjen

    Our newly elected PM has already ratified the Kyoto Agreement, takes effect next year in Indonesia. That makes the US the only developed nation to not be a part of it.

    Just a note about one of the companies listed, Shell. They've been on the environmental bandwagon for years, spending billions on research for sustainable eco-friendly forms of energy.

  • flipper
    flipper

    I think " big business is wanting to " appear " concerned about global warming for appearance sake, kind of like the Watchtower society was " happy" the abuse victims got a fair settlement but also for appearance sake. Everything is about posturing, but the bottom line remains still the financial profit ! They will say they are looking for new energy sources as long as it "appears " they are, but the almighty dollar will still rule. Peace out, Mr. Flipper

  • nvrgnbk
    nvrgnbk
    I think " big business is wanting to " appear " concerned about global warming for appearance sake, kind of like the Watchtower society was " happy" the abuse victims got a fair settlement but also for appearance sake. Everything is about posturing, but the bottom line remains still the financial profit ! They will say they are looking for new energy sources as long as it "appears " they are, but the almighty dollar will still rule. Peace out, Mr. Flipper

    I would have normally agreed with that, Mr. Flipper, but the actions described in the article above are rather interesting.

  • worldtraveller
    worldtraveller

    If it's not about profit , then it's about tax deductions. The Wal Marts of the world didn't get there bacause of compassion. Pfffft... .

  • 5go
    5go

    It's sad when GM gets it before Washington gets it.

    The first plug in hybrid with electric drive which means the engine has no physical connection to the wheels at all. Expect it in 2009

  • nvrgnbk
    nvrgnbk
    If it's not about profit , then it's about tax deductions. The Wal Marts of the world didn't get there bacause of compassion. Pfffft... .

    I bet Coca-Cola, one of the companies involved in the above, hates Wal Mart as much as you do.

  • beksbks
    beksbks

    I think it depends on the company.

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit