MISQUOTING JESUS: a book I highly endorse

by Terry 18 Replies latest watchtower bible

  • Terry
    Terry
    Chapter One
    The Beginnings of Christian Scripture

    To discuss the copies of the New Testament that we have, we need to start at the very beginning with one of the unusual features of Christianity in the Greco-Roman world: its bookish character. In fact, to make sense of this feature of Christianity, we need to start before the beginnings of Christianity with the religion from which Christianity sprang, Judaism. For the bookishness of Christianity was in some sense anticipated and foreshadowed by Judaism, which was the first "religion of the book" in Western civilization.

    Judaism as a Religion of the Book

    The Judaism from which Christianity sprang was an unusual religion in the Roman world, although by no means unique. Like adherents of any of the other (hundreds of ) religions in the Mediterranean area, Jews acknowledged the existence of a divine realm populated by superhuman beings (angels, archangels, principalities, powers); they subscribed to the worship of a deity through sacrifices of animals and other food products; they maintained that there was a special holy place where this divine being dwelt here on earth (the Temple in Jerusalem), and it was there that these sacrifices were to be made. They prayed to this God for communal and personal needs. They told stories about how this God had interacted with human beings in the past, and they anticipated his help for human beings in the present. In all these ways, Judaism was "familiar" to the worshipers of other gods in the empire.

    In some ways, though, Judaism was distinctive. All other religions in the empire were polytheistic -- acknowledging and worshiping many gods of all sorts and functions: great gods of the state, lesser gods of various locales, gods who oversaw different aspects of human birth, life, and death. Judaism, on the other hand, was monotheistic; Jews insisted on worshiping only the one God of their ancestors, the God who, they maintained, had created this world, controlled this world, and alone provided what was needed for his people. According to Jewish tradition, this one all-powerful God had called Israel to be his special people and had promised to protect and defend them in exchange for their absolute devotion to him and him alone. The Jewish people, it was believed, had a "covenant" with this God, an agreement that they would be uniquely his as he was uniquely theirs. Only this one God was to be worshiped and obeyed; so, too, there was only one Temple, unlike in the polytheistic religions of the day in which, for example, there could be any number of temples to a god like Zeus. To be sure, Jews could worship God anywhere they lived, but they could perform their religious obligations of sacrifice to God only at the Temple in Jerusalem. In other places, though, they could gather together in "synagogues" for prayer and to discuss the ancestral traditions at the heart of their religion.

    These traditions involved both stories about God's interaction with the ancestors of the people of Israel -- the patriarchs and matriarchs of the faith, as it were: Abraham, Sarah, Isaac, Rachel, Jacob, Rebecca, Joseph, Moses, David, and so on -- and detailed instructions concerning how this people was to worship and live. One of the things that made Judaism unique among the religions of the Roman Empire was that these instructions, along with the other ancestral traditions, were written down in sacred books.

    For modern people intimately familiar with any of the major contemporary Western religions (Judaism, Christianity, Islam), it may be hard to imagine, but books played virtually no role in the polytheistic religions of the ancient Western world. These religions were almost exclusively concerned with honoring the gods through ritual acts of sacrifice. There were no doctrines to be learned, as explained in books, and almost no ethical principles to be followed, as laid out in books. This is not to say that adherents of the various polytheistic religions had no beliefs about their gods or that they had no ethics, but beliefs and ethics -- strange as this sounds to modern ears -- played almost no role in religion per se. These were instead matters of personal philosophy, and philosophies, of course, could be bookish. Since ancient religions themselves did not require any particular sets of "right doctrines" or, for the most part, "ethical codes," books played almost no role in them.

    Judaism was unique in that it stressed its ancestral traditions, customs, and laws, and maintained that these had been recorded in sacred books, which had the status, therefore, of "scripture" for the Jewish people. During the period of our concern -- the first century of the common era, 1 when the books of the New Testament were being written -- Jews scattered throughout the Roman Empire understood in particular that God had given direction to his people in the writings of Moses, referred to collectively as the Torah, which literally means something like "law" or "guidance." The Torah consists of five books, sometimes called the Pentateuch (the "five scrolls"), the beginning of the Jewish Bible (the Christian Old Testament): Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, and Deuteronomy. Here one finds accounts of the creation of the world, the calling of Israel to be God's people, the stories of Israel's patriarchs and matriarchs and God's involvement with them, and most important (and most extensive), the laws that God gave Moses indicating how his people were to worship him and behave toward one another in community together. These were sacred laws, to be learned, discussed, and followed -- and they were written in a set of books.

    Jews had other books that were important for their religious lives together as well, for example, books of prophets (such as Isaiah, Jeremiah, and Amos), and poems (Psalms), and history (such as Joshua and Samuel). Eventually, some time after Christianity began, a group of these Hebrew books -- twenty-two of them altogether -- came to be regarded as a sacred canon of scripture, the Jewish Bible of today, accepted by Christians as the first part of the Christian canon, the "Old Testament." 2
    The foregoing is excerpted from Misquoting Jesus by Bart Ehrman. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be used or reproduced without written permission from HarperCollins Publishers, 10 East 53rd Street, New York, NY 10022

  • Terry
    Terry

    Misquoting Jesus

    The Story Behind Who Changed the Bible and Why

    by Bart Ehrman
    Editorial Reviews From Booklist
    The popular perception of the Bible as a divinely perfect book receives scant support from Ehrman, who sees in Holy Writ ample evidence of human fallibility and ecclesiastical politics. Though himself schooled in evangelical literalism, Ehrman has come to regard his earlier faith in the inerrant inspiration of the Bible as misguided, given that the original texts have disappeared and that the extant texts available do not agree with one another. Most of the textual discrepancies, Ehrman acknowledges, matter little, but some do profoundly affect religious doctrine. To assess how ignorant or theologically manipulative scribes may have changed the biblical text, modern scholars have developed procedures for comparing diverging texts. And in language accessible to nonspecialists, Ehrman explains these procedures and their results. He further explains why textual criticism has frequently sparked intense controversy, especially among scripture-alone Protestants. In discounting not only the authenticity of existing manuscripts but also the inspiration of the original writers, Ehrman will deeply divide his readers. Although he addresses a popular audience, he undercuts the very religious attitudes that have made the Bible a popular book. Still, this is a useful overview for biblical history collections. Bryce Christensen
    Copyright © American Library Association. All rights reserved

    Listen to an on air interview with the author on NPR:

    Listen to this story... by Terry Gross

  • drew sagan
    drew sagan

    I enjoyed reading this book. I got the feeling that he kind of has an axe to grind with conservative christians (but really, who dosn't). Other than that his exegesis worth reviewing. It certainly isn't the 'slam dunk' hit on the Bible some make it out to be, but is still a good read.

  • Terry
    Terry
    I got the feeling that he kind of has an axe to grind with conservative christians

    The impression I got after reading his book and listening to the NPR interview is that he view conservative christians as intellectually dishonest.

    Having been a fundamentalist and biblical literalist himself it is not surprising his reformed viewpoint is critical.

    Ex-smokers are the least tolerant among us, after all.

    In all the extensive reading I've done about the bible and early christianity I had not learned some of the things Bart Ehrman wrote about in this book.

    1.A tiny percentage of people in late Judaism and early Christianity were able to read and write. They depended on somebody to read to them and hired people to write for them.

    2.Copyists could easily be illiterate too! The ability to copy letters is more artistic and rote than necessary.

    3. Copyist errors were the number one problem of book reproductions and lamented and excoriated by the early church fathers.

    4.Pious frauds and the introduction of personal viewpoint in translations and redaction were commonplace.

    5.It was the most ignorant and gullible of early society who embraced the miracle stories of the Jesus saga. Apparently the naive and superstitious poor and illiterate people formed the core of nascent Christianity.

    6.It was the formation of bible canon by so-called heretics which rallied church officials to form one of their own by way of rebuttal.

    7.Opinions were wide and varied as to which books were to be included among the canon.

  • freefly
    freefly

    I have been reading Bart D. Ehrman lately- Misquoting Jesus...the story behind Who changed the bible and Why -was written at my level, easy to read and understand the fact that for almost fifteen hundred years these manuscripts (NT) were hand copied by scribes who were deeply influenced by the cultural, theological, and political disputes of their day. Also the authors of NT were human beings with needs, beliefs, worldviews, opinions, loves, hates, longings, desires,....(the only reason for God to inspire the Bible would be so that his people would have his actual words; but if he really wanted his people to have his actual words...he would have miraculously preserved those words, just as he had miraculously inspired them in the first place.)

    As a world class bibical scholar- I liked how he spent the time to explain textual criticism/ the beginnings of christian scripture/ the copyists of the early christain writings/ texts of the new testament (editions, manuscripts, and differences)/ the quest for origins/ originals that matter/ theologically motivated alterations of the text/ the social worlds of the text, changing scripture/

    I have also read Truth and Fiction in the DA VINCI CODE by Bart /and looking to read "Lost Christianities."

    freefly

  • Terry
    Terry

    The more I see what little is there at the actual core of religion; the more I cringe.

  • LittleToe
    LittleToe
    The more I see what little is there at the actual core of religion; the more I cringe.

    Why? Is it because:

    Ex-smokers are the least tolerant among us, after all.

  • Terry
    Terry
    The more I see what little is there at the actual core of religion; the more I cringe.
    Why? Is it because:
    Ex-smokers are the least tolerant among us, after all.

    Ahhh, so we SHOULD TOLERATE what amounts to an immoral scheme to rob people of their self-esteem and their individuality!

  • Blueblades
    Blueblades

    Terry! Thanks for the review on that book . I will get this one to add to my collection.

    Blueblades

  • Terry
    Terry
    Terry! Thanks for the review on that book . I will get this one to add to my collection.

    This book is worth every penny of the cover price!

    Check Amazon used section for discounts.

    *disclaimer: I work in a bookstore and get my books free! At least for thirty days. This is a book I had to own.

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit