Insight Book on CD-ROM under CHRONOLOGY different from print version.

by ithinkisee 21 Replies latest watchtower bible

  • ithinkisee
    ithinkisee

    Page 453 (VOL 1) of the PRINTED books states: A Babylonian clay tablet is helpful for connecting Babylonian chronology with Biblical chronology. This tablet contains the following astronomical information for the seventh year of Cambyses II son of Cyrus II: "Year 7, Tammuz, night of the 14th, 1 2/3 double hours [three hours and twenty minutes] after night came, a lunar eclipse; visible in its full course; it reached over the northern half disc [of the moon]. Tebet, night of the 14th, two and a half double hours [five hours] at night before morning [in the latter part of the night], the disc of the moon was eclipsed; the whole course visible; over the southern and northern part the eclipse reached." (Inschriften von Cambyses, König von Babylon, by J. N. Strassmaier, Leipzig, 1890, No. 400, lines 45-48; Sternkunde und Sterndienst in Babel, by F. X. Kugler, Münster, 1907, Vol. I, pp. 70, 71) These two lunar eclipses can be identified with the lunar eclipses that were visible at Babylon on July 16, 523 B.C.E., and on January 10, 522 B.C.E. (Oppolzer’s Canon of Eclipses, translated by O. Gingerich, 1962, p. 335) Thus, this tablet establishes the seventh year of Cambyses II as beginning in the spring of 523 B.C.E. This is an astronomically confirmed date. but here is what the CD-ROM (2005) says: *** it-1 p. 453 Chronology ***

    A Babylonian clay tablet is helpful for connecting Babylonian chronology with Biblical chronology. This tablet contains the following astronomical information for the seventh year of Cambyses II son of Cyrus II: "Year 7, Tammuz, night of the 14th, 1 2/3 double hours [three hours and twenty minutes] after night came, a lunar eclipse; visible in its full course; it reached over the northern half disc [of the moon]. Tebet, night of the 14th, two and a half double hours [five hours] at night before morning [in the latter part of the night], the disc of the moon was eclipsed; the whole course visible; over the southern and northern part the eclipse reached." (Inschriften von Cambyses, König von Babylon, by J. N. Strassmaier, Leipzig, 1890, No. 400, lines 45-48; Sternkunde und Sterndienst in Babel, by F. X. Kugler, Münster, 1907, Vol. I, pp. 70, 71) These two lunar eclipses can evidently be identified with the lunar eclipses that were visible at Babylon on July 16, 523 B.C.E., and on January 10, 522 B.C.E. (Oppolzer’s Canon of Eclipses, translated by O. Gingerich, 1962, p. 335) Thus, this tablet establishes the seventh year of Cambyses II as beginning in the spring of 523 B.C.E. This is an astronomically confirmed date. ==================== Notice how they added the word EVIDENTLY - and even BOLDED it. Does anyone know if they have updated this in the new print versions of the INSIGHT book?

    Could they be feeling the heat that they really can't tout ANY secular evidence? Are people noticing that they seem to cherry-pick secular evidence when it suits them? I apologize if this has been brought up already. I have a big discussion on the horizon with a family member and want to get the sh*t straight. -ithinkisee PS: I am using the WT CD-ROM 2005 as downloaded from reexamine.org
  • Jeffro
    Jeffro

    The printed version I used to have included the word evidently, and so did the copy my father has.

    I threw out my copy, and I have no contact with my father so I can't verify the year of publication of those copies. I'm pretty sure the one my father has was acquired at the original release of the book. Not sure if it was printed in Australia, or whether that makes a difference.

  • garybuss
    garybuss

    My hard copy is a first printing 1,000,000 1988 and it does not have "evidently"

  • TheListener
    TheListener

    I will check my hard copy tonight.

    I will also check each version of the CD rom that I have installed.

  • Elsewhere
    Elsewhere

    DAMN!

    Someone PLEASE make a scan of your hard-copy! I would be more than happy to host it!

  • stillajwexelder
    stillajwexelder

    *** it-1 p. 453 Chronology ***

    These two lunar eclipses can evidently be identified with the lunar eclipses that were visible at Babylon on July 16, 523 B.C.E., and on January 10, 522 B.C.E. (Oppolzer’s Canon of Eclipses, translated by O. Gingerich, 1962, p. 335) Thus, this tablet establishes the seventh year of Cambyses II as beginning in the spring of 523 B.C.E. This is an astronomically confirmed date.

    This is a cut and paste from my CD-ROM - not the online version

  • BluesBrother
    BluesBrother

    Insight On the Scriptures first printing 1988 - p453 , 1st column , para 2 towards the end of it

    alt

  • moggy lover
    moggy lover

    I can confirm Garybus and his observation. I have the same edition, and yes, the word "evidently" is conspicuously absent

    Cheers

  • nicolaou
    nicolaou

    There ya go!

    alt

  • VM44
    VM44

    Why did they think the word "evidently" needed to be inserted into the sentence?

    This doesn't make much sense to me.

    How did it change the meaning of the sentence?

    --VM44

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit