Philosophically speaking the multiverse idea is not science yet, but a hypothesis which has not been observed directly or indirectly. Philosophy also doesn’t settle on any type of God as it simply looks at the arguments for them or him, to see if they have validity or not. To the best of my knowledge the preponderance of philosophy in general is that a theistic God cannot be proven or unproven in objective terms.
Seraphim23
JoinedPosts by Seraphim23
-
32
Science and Philosephy.- God
by HowTheBibleWasCreated inwhen i discovered ervs and #2 chromosome i knew there was no personal god.
the rest is history.
i have always since kept updated in science as much as possible.. .
-
-
-
22
evolution
by venting injust wanted to encourage people still in the org.
to study the theory of evolution in a non jehovahs witness setting.
i used to think the evolution book was great.
-
-
Seraphim23
This is a good video about the genetic evidence for evolution.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=hYXy_pEcbws
-
137
9yr old girl kills her gun instructor with an uzi
by EndofMysteries inhttp://www.cnn.com/2014/08/26/us/arizona-girl-fatal-shooting-accident/index.html?hpt=hp_t2.
"a 9-year-old girl learning to fire a submachine gun accidentally killed her instructor at a shooting range when the weapon recoiled over her shoulder, according to arizona authorities.
another reason to go against those arguing that young children should be taught how to use guns.
-
-
Seraphim23
The only resonable answer is remove guns from the culture.
-
51
The limits of science.
by Seraphim23 infor a long time i have accepted that when a theist inserts god into some as yet not understood scientific matter, it constitutes a god of the gaps argument.
as a theist myself, the problem with this for me, is that it implies an arbitrary limit on gods ingenuity.
for example, the idea that god created automatic processes to do certain things in nature, and yet with other things the need for a direct hand to either tweak or directly organise!
-
-
Seraphim23
The relationship between science and religion
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vMzURpV7iS4&feature=player_detailpage
-
51
The limits of science.
by Seraphim23 infor a long time i have accepted that when a theist inserts god into some as yet not understood scientific matter, it constitutes a god of the gaps argument.
as a theist myself, the problem with this for me, is that it implies an arbitrary limit on gods ingenuity.
for example, the idea that god created automatic processes to do certain things in nature, and yet with other things the need for a direct hand to either tweak or directly organise!
-
-
-
51
The limits of science.
by Seraphim23 infor a long time i have accepted that when a theist inserts god into some as yet not understood scientific matter, it constitutes a god of the gaps argument.
as a theist myself, the problem with this for me, is that it implies an arbitrary limit on gods ingenuity.
for example, the idea that god created automatic processes to do certain things in nature, and yet with other things the need for a direct hand to either tweak or directly organise!
-
-
-
51
The limits of science.
by Seraphim23 infor a long time i have accepted that when a theist inserts god into some as yet not understood scientific matter, it constitutes a god of the gaps argument.
as a theist myself, the problem with this for me, is that it implies an arbitrary limit on gods ingenuity.
for example, the idea that god created automatic processes to do certain things in nature, and yet with other things the need for a direct hand to either tweak or directly organise!
-
-
-
51
The limits of science.
by Seraphim23 infor a long time i have accepted that when a theist inserts god into some as yet not understood scientific matter, it constitutes a god of the gaps argument.
as a theist myself, the problem with this for me, is that it implies an arbitrary limit on gods ingenuity.
for example, the idea that god created automatic processes to do certain things in nature, and yet with other things the need for a direct hand to either tweak or directly organise!
-
-
-
51
The limits of science.
by Seraphim23 infor a long time i have accepted that when a theist inserts god into some as yet not understood scientific matter, it constitutes a god of the gaps argument.
as a theist myself, the problem with this for me, is that it implies an arbitrary limit on gods ingenuity.
for example, the idea that god created automatic processes to do certain things in nature, and yet with other things the need for a direct hand to either tweak or directly organise!
-
-
Seraphim23
Sorry cofty. I thought in the spirit of scientific discovery you might have discovered the video for yourself. Anyhow it is a little video about religion and science presented by Professor Russell Stannard who holds the position of Professor Emeritus of Physics at the Open University. The OU is one of the world's largest universities founded in the UK.
-
51
The limits of science.
by Seraphim23 infor a long time i have accepted that when a theist inserts god into some as yet not understood scientific matter, it constitutes a god of the gaps argument.
as a theist myself, the problem with this for me, is that it implies an arbitrary limit on gods ingenuity.
for example, the idea that god created automatic processes to do certain things in nature, and yet with other things the need for a direct hand to either tweak or directly organise!
-
-