AngryXJW
JoinedTopics Started by AngryXJW
-
6
Harvey - JW Wins SCOSC Blood Transfusion Decision
by AngryXJW in.
.
edited by - angryxjw on 3 july 2002 17:19:40.
-
4
Clueless Reporter Needs Info Re Door Knockers
by AngryXJW in.
.
[email protected] should be contacted with the fact that the "witnessing requirement" includes convicted pedophiles.
-
80
Was Russell a freemason and an adventist?
by wholewheat inwas russell a freemason and was he a member of the adventist church?
-
4
SCONH AFFIRMS GREGORY BLACKSTOCK CONVICTION
by AngryXJW in) erred by: (1) denying his motion to dismiss on the basis that the state presented insufficient evidence to prove that he touched the minor's genitalia; (2) ruling that if he cross-examined c.b.
" after the defendant touched her, c.b.
and that he had never touched her.
-
5
Ida Eisenhower and Jehovah's Witnesses
by Kenneson inmarley cole in 1955 wrote "jehovah's witnesses the new world society," which includes a photocopy of a letter ida eisenhower wrote in 1943 to j.w.
lawson of long island, n.y. therein, she stated that she had been in the truth since 1896 and naomi engle who stayed with her was also a witness.
since she died the next year, mrs. eisenhower apparently died as a faithful jehovah's witness.
-
19
ALERT ON BLOOD REFUSAL CASE/ALBERTA/SHUNNED FATHER
by hawkaw inas all should be aware, lawrence hughes daughter has leukemia and is in the 4th and final stage of treatment.
the jws are still fighting to have the daughter declared an adult instead of a minor so she can kill herself instead of receiving a life saving blood transfusion.
now lawrence's lawyer refuses to help anymore even though 1 case is on appeal at the supreme court and a second trial is starting in alberta on monday june 17, 2002. .
-
57
Legal Question: How Strong is Barbara's Case?
by Room 215 ina question for the legal beagles out there:.
since the watchtower thugs have told the press during the dateline repartee that barbara anderson was not being taken to task for her anti-molestation iniitatives, but alleged that she was being tried for ``allegations or serious sins'' unrelated to her activism, how strong a case would she have in court?.
bear in mind that barbara and the others of the dateline four say they did nothing more than speak for the protection of children and then publicly challenged the wt to publicly state their accusations and evidence, and that they would indemnify them against any charges arising therefrom.. so.... if they call her a sinner, say that her sin has nothing to do with whistle-blowing and is serious enough to merit expulsion -- as serious as adultery or theft, yet refuse to accept her challenge to show the world the basis of their charges if they are held harmless, how is that not libel and therefore actionable?
-
45
DEAR WTS, I love your new director.......
by deddaisy inanother example of gross hypocrisy - do they honestly think that these type of things will never be discovered?
unbelievable.
i suppose their excuse is that the shares were donated as gifts and through wills etc, yet surely they should not accept them if they are not appropriate to the teachings of the organisation.