Paedophiliac

by midnight 9 Replies latest watchtower child-abuse

  • midnight
    midnight

    I don't think Jehovah likes paedophiliac behaviour . Has anyone got a reference to an article anywhere that shows watchtower giving council that paedophiliac thoughts , feelings , leanings are wrong ?

  • midnight
    midnight

    To help the peadophile avoid bad behaviour ?

  • Iown Mylife
    Iown Mylife

    All they do is "counsel" the criminal brother to keep away from children so as not to be tempted. Pretty strong measures, huh?

  • Richard Oliver
    Richard Oliver

    You do understand that someone who has an attraction to a child (someone who has paedophiliac tendencies) does not necessarily mean that they have committed any crime. By definition it is someone who is attracted to a child, the definition isn't that someone has committed a sex act with a child. There are plenty of productive members of society who are by definition sociopaths or psychopaths, and may have a tendency to harm others but don't act upon those desires. Even the law recognizes the difference, in most western nations, police cannot arrest someone for their thoughts or even if they verbally describe something that they wish they could do, but does not put in a plan into motion to commit the act or has committed the act.

  • Incognito
    Incognito

    RO - How do your comments address Midnight's question posed in the original post?

  • Richard Oliver
    Richard Oliver

    I was referencing Iown Mylife, where they automatically called them criminals. It is disgusting thoughts but they don't become criminals till they put in motion a plan to abuse a child sexually.

  • Stealth
    Stealth
    " someone who has an attraction to a child (someone who has paedophiliac tendencies) does not necessarily mean that they have committed any crime."

    No, but they are still mentally ill.

    "There are plenty of productive members of society who are by definition sociopaths or psychopaths, and may have a tendency to harm others but don't act upon those desires."

    No, but they are still assholes.



  • midnight
    midnight

    No I mean in the way we are lectured against masturbation , porn etc

  • midnight
    midnight

    Surely warning against paedophiliac tendencies is far more important !!!!

  • waton
    waton

    "child" in some definition is pre-puberty age, the law against possible sex crimes though, covers, in many areas, all youth below 18 years of age. If you covered the faces of "perfect" specimen -(women), - in many pictures of the media, that image matches often the "sweet sixteen" body. It is now illegal to photoshop maturer faces to 12 year old bodies, as was the custom, in some jurisdiction. so:

    keep the the call for action, to where it counts, in the prepuberty range. after all,

    many sisters dream of having that 15 year old body again, with the wiles to used it, of a 150 old lady, -- and so do the males.

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit