Memorial 2014: Wrong date?

by AnnOMaly 53 Replies latest watchtower bible

  • TD
    What am I doing wrong?


  • AnnOMaly

    wizzstick, yes, you're doing nothing wrong. It'll be the converter. Passover this year begins sunset Monday April 14 which corresponds to Nisan 15.

    Check another page on the same site:

    "All holidays begin at sundown on the evening before the date specified in the tables below." Pesach (Passover) 2014 is listed as April 15-22. This means Pesach begins at sundown the evening before, i.e. April 14.

    This makes it clearer:

    "Passover begins on the 15th day of the month of Nisan in the Jewish calendar ... Mon, 14 April 2014 at sundown (15th of Nisan, 5774)."

  • cultBgone

    Saving this

  • TD
    What am I doing wrong?

    You understand that Jehovah's Witnesses believe that the daylight portion of Monday, April 14th, 2014 is actually Nisan 13 and that Nisan 14 does not begin until that evening, right?

  • Phizzy

    Post 16114 of 16118
    Since 9/1/2002

    Here is a very long 2011 post from Leo on this :

    "Tonight on the evening of April 18, 2011, observant Jews worldwide will celebrate Passover Seder, a night "different from all other nights". The Watchtower Society annually schedules the Memorial for Jehovah's Witnesses on a date that is supposed to coincide with the Jewish observance of Passover, as it would have been reckoned during Second Temple times (in particular, in the first century AD during the life of Jesus). This year the Memorial was observed last night, the evening of April 17. The two religious observances are thus a day out of sync, at least this year. There are a number of reasons for the dates to not coincide, such as the rationale used for determining the years intercalated with a second Adar. This post is not concerned with the reckoning of Nisan, intercalation, or related matters. This post is solely concerned with the reason why the two observances are on different days this year.

    The historical evidence undermines the claim that the JW reckoning is the same as that used in the first century to schedule Passover.

    The February 1, 2011 issue of the Watchtower has an article on the Memorial and its scheduling. On p. 22 we read in a footnote:

    This date may not coincide with that of the Passover kept by modern-day Jews. Why not? Most Jews today keep the Passover on Nisan 15, believing that the command at Exodus 12:6 points to that date. (See The Watchtower of February 15, 1990, page 14.) But Jesus celebrated it on Nisan 14 in harmony with what was started in the Mosaic Law. For more information on how to calculate this date, see The Watchtower of June 15, 1977, pages 383-384.

    Notice here the definitive claim that the Passover Jesus celebrated was indeed celebrated a day earlier than the day observed by "modern-day Jews". When we examine the referenced article from the 1990 Watchtower, we can see the arguments for the reckoning in further detail:

    *** w90 2/15 p. 14 pars. 21-22 From Seder to Salvation ***

    The Hebrew day ran from sunset (about six o’clock) to the next sunset. God commanded that the Passover lamb be killed on Nisan 14 “between the two evenings.” (Exodus 12:6) When would that be? Modern Jews cling to the rabbinical view that the lamb was to be slaughtered near the end of Nisan 14, between the time when the sun began to descend (about three o’clock) and the actual sunset. As a result, they hold their Seder after sundown, when Nisan 15 has begun.—Mark 1:32.

    We have good reason, however, to understand the expression differently. Deuteronomy 16:6 clearly told the Israelites to “slaughter the passover sacrifice, in the evening, at sundown.” (Jewish Tanakh version) This indicates that “between the two evenings” referred to the twilight period, from sunset (which begins Nisan 14) to actual darkness. The ancient Karaite Jews understood it this way, as do Samaritans down to today. Our accepting that the Passover lamb was sacrificed and eaten “at its appointed time” on Nisan 14, not on Nisan 15, is one reason why our Memorial date sometimes differs from the Jewish date.—Numbers 9:2-5.

    In addition to the exegetical arguments, the Society also claims ancient support from the attested practices of Karaite Jews and Samaritans. This shows that the reasoning that the Society adopts is not an idiosyncratic position but a line of interpretation that goes back to rabbinical times. The question that concerns us is whether this exegetical tradition makes the best sense of the cited scriptures and whether there is any historical evidence on when Passover was observed in the first century AD.

    The position the Society takes is clearly the more problematic one. First of all, the redacted narrative in Exodus 12 presents Yahweh as striking down the firstborn sons in Egypt "on the same night" that the Israelites eat the Passover meal (v. 12), specifically "at midnight" (v. 29), and it was "during the night" when the Egyptians discovered that their children had been struck down and mourned them (v. 30), and it was also "during the night" when Pharaoh told Moses and Aaron to take the Israelites and "hurry and leave the country" (v. 31-33), and so the Israelites promptly left Raameses (v. 37). The Israelites left so quickly they did not have time to prepare the bread (v. 39), for they "left Egypt in haste" (cf. Deuteronomy 16:3). There is no indication that they waited a whole day until the following night. But in Numbers 33:3 we read that "they departed Ramesses in the first month on the fifteenth day of the first month, on the morrow after Passover". If the Passover meal was held early on Nisan 14 (as the Society holds), then the Israelites would not have left right away (as it would have still been Nisan 14). As the Society itself states, if the Passover lambs were slaughtered prior to sunset, "the Passover meal itself would have been eaten in Egypt on Nisan 15 and the Israelites would not have left Egypt until that date" (Watchtower, 15 March 1973, p. 175). Yet that is in fact the date given in Numbers 33:3.

    Second, the meanings of "in the evening" (ba`ereb) and "at sundown" (bô' haššamesh) in Deuteronomy 16:6 are not necessarily what the Society assumes. With a day reckoned either from sunset to sunset or as a period of sunlight in contrast to night (as in Genesis 1), the "evening" was often presented as the close of the day (yôm). It is the time when the day's work ends (Genesis 30:16, Judges 19:16, Ruth 2:17, Psalm 104:23), when one may draw water for the night (Genesis 24:11), or set up camp for the night (2 Samuel 11:13, Zephaniah 2:7). Since work is forbidden on the Sabbath, the "evening" here would have to mark the end of the day. Sundown could either refer to the descent of the sun towards the horizon during the afternoon or the descent of the sun across the horizon itself (equivalent to what we refer to as "sunset"). But let's assume for the sake of argument that it refers to sunset. Would the slaughtering of the paschal lamb at sunset occur at the end of the day or at the start of a new day? The Society interprets the phrase as necessarily the latter. But this is not consistent with its usage elsewhere. So for example, we read in Deuteronomy 21:23 that one "must not leave the body hanging on a tree overnight; be sure to bury it that same day, because anyone who is hung on a pole is under God’s curse". The removal of bodies from trees at sundown in Joshua 8:29 and 10:27 reflects this provision in D (as does John 19:31). But in both passages we read that Joshua gave the command to remove the corpses "at sundown" (bô' haššamesh) and in 8:29 we further read that the corpses remained on the trees "until evening" (`ad `eth-`ereb). Since the action reflects the law commanding the removal of the bodies "on the same day", the phrase "at sundown" points to a time at the end of the day. In parallel to this, the paschal lambs in Deuteronomy 16:6 would be slaughtered towards the end of Nisan 14, not at the start of the day.

    The most difficult phrase is "between the evenings" (bên ha`arbayim) in Exodus 12:6, a wording that sounds particularly obscure in English (and it may also have been an idiom in Hebrew without this literal meaning). But here again usage points rather clearly to a time in the late afternoon at the end of the day. With regard to the Tamid sacrifice, we read in Numbers 28:3-4 that two lambs are to be sacrificed each day, "one lamb in the morning and the other between the evenings (bên ha`arbayim)". In Daniel 8:14, 26, the time of the latter sacrifice is simply "evening" (`ereb). Notice that in Numbers 28, the morning sacrifice is mentioned first followed by the one "between the evenings", and both occur in a single "day" (yôm). Unless the second lamb is killed before sunset, it could not be killed on the same day as the first. Josephus understood the text in the same way, he wrote that the law requires "a one-year-old lamb be killed every day at the beginning and at the ending of the day" (Antiquities, 3.237). Here he uses the Greek word hemeras "day" in its usual sense as the period of daylight from sunrise to sunset (as opposed to nux "night" as the period from sunset to sunrise). The morning sacrifice occurs at the "beginning of the day" and the evening sacrifice occurs "at the ending of the day". Elsewhere Josephus says that the second sacrifice was done in the ninth hour (Antiquitates 14.65), i.e. 3-4pm.

    Such an understanding can be found in the LXX translation of the Pentateuch (mid-third century BC); the phrase "between the evenings" (bên ha`arbayim) is rendered "in the afternoon" (to deilinon) in Exodus 29:39-41 LXX. Moreover the earliest explicit commentary on the timing of Passover can be found in Jubilees (mid-second century BC), an early Essene work. There we read that "the children of Israel will be the ones who come and observe Passover on its appointed day on the fourteenth of the first month between the evenings from the third part of the day until the third part of the night because two parts of the day are given for light and one third for evening" and "they shall sacrifice the Passover at evening when the sun is setting on the third part of the day" (49:10, 19). This utilizes an Essene division of the day into three segments (6am-10am, 10am-2pm, 2pm-6pm), the third of which is set aside for "evening", and the night similarly divides into three parts (6pm-10pm, 10pm-2am, 2am-6am). This passage clearly states that the Passover begins "from the third part of the day", with the sacrifice occurring "at evening when the sun is setting on the third part of the day". This puts the sacrifice towards the end of the day between 2pm and 6pm, probably close to sunset "at evening" when the work for the day is done. Passover is thus observed from then until 2am on Nisan 15.

    Of course, the Essenes were not in charge of the Temple, and neither were the Pharisees (the forebears of the rabbis authoritative to modern Judaism) nor the Samaritans. The Karaites did not even exist yet. Now it is true that the Samaritans and the Karaites may preserve older exegetical interpretations and practices, such as the reckoning of Shavuot (Pentecost), which disagrees with the view in rabbinical Judaism but agrees with the ancient reckoning of the Essenes. Here the Essene view in Jubilees disagrees with that of the Karaites and Samaritans. It does however agree with what Josephus wrote about the actual reckoning of Passover in the first century AD. He wrote that the high priests, "upon the coming of their feast which is called Passover, slay their sacrifices from the ninth hour till the eleventh" (Bellum Judaicum, 6.423). The "ninth hour" begins at 3pm (cf. Matthew 27:45, Mark 15:33-34, Luke 23:44) and the "eleventh hour" begins at 5pm. This shows that when Passover was observed at the Temple in the first century AD, the paschal lambs were indeed slaughtered in the afternoon at the end of Nisan 14, between 3pm and 5pm, and not early on Nisan 14 just after sundown as claimed by the Society. This testimony shows that the interpretation favoured by the Society does not likely represent the actual reckoning of Passover in Jerusalem in the first century AD.

    thetrueone....Yes, that passage is simple and clear. Now if we look at the chart in the February 1, 2011 Watchtower, we can see that the events of Mark 14:12 are dated to Nisan 13. Yet that passage dates the Passover preparations to "the first day of unfermented cakes, when they customarily sacrificed the passover [lambs]". And the article on the "Passover" in the Insight book (Vol. 2, p. 581-583) tries to argue rather confusingly that the day before Passover could be the date in question by claiming that "on the first day of unfermented cakes" really means "on the day before unfermented cakes" (but why should this be Nisan 13 instead of Nisan 14, the actual day before the traditional first day of the festival of unfermented bread), yet they acknowledge that it was Nisan 14 on which the passover lamb was slain (Vol. 1, p. 592), which pretty much rules out Nisan 13 if it was the same day.

    jwfacts....The dates may coincide, I think, because the Society uses a different method of determining the date of the full moon. "

  • 88JM

    For a cult that is so date-oriented, you think they would at least try to get it right when it comes to these things!

  • Phizzy

    I do think they kind of try, but being totally inept, and totally ignorant as to how to read the Bible, the poor saps keep making a cock-up of it.

    The more you look at their arguments/doctrines you realise that they really do not do their homework. I think this comes from the toxic mix of ignorance and arrogance.

    None of the GB for sure, and probably all of the Writing Committee, have not had a formal education in Bible Study, in any of the fields therof, in other words Ignorance.

    To go along with this they believe somehow (with no proof that stands up) that they are chosen by God, and so they feel that their "insights" are special, and no matter how those insights conflict with the views of experienced scholars in the field, they are right. In other words, Arrogance.

  • Quarterback

    Wow, you really can't win this argument. This comes up every year around this time and someone dissagrees with the WT calculation. Last year, the argument started because the WT didn't match the Jewish date for Passover. Now, this year the Jews and the WT agree. Even when they agree, they are wrong.

  • AnnOMaly

    Thanks for posting Leo's comments, Phizzy :-)

    Surely, Jesus as the ultimate sacrificial Lamb would be killed when other lambs were being slaughtered, otherwise the biblical parallel doesn't fit so well. Jesus would be sitting down to a Passover meal before "Christ our Passover lamb" (1 Cor. 5:7 RNWT) was slaughtered. This would suggest that the final meal Jesus shared with all the apostles was a last supper rather than a Passover.

  • TD
    Now, this year the Jews and the WT agree.

    Not really.

    The coincidence of the date this year is accidental and the only reason it happens once in awhile is that JW's approach each year independent of every other year.

  • Quarterback

    Even if it is's still matches the Jews calculation, and both are found to agree, this time.

    Stay tuned for the argument in 2015.

  • AnnOMaly

    JWs may have arrived at the same date in the Gregorian calendar but they think it corresponds to Nisan 14, whereas the Jews think it corresponds to Nisan 15. Both think it corresponds to the date of the Passover.

    As far as Jewish practice goes, JWs are associating Passover with the wrong date (the 14th rather than 15th) and they have miscalculated the sighting of the new crescent to start the month (should be March 31 rather than April 1). So it's not really an agreement in calculations but a coincidence that JWs and Jews have arrived at the same Gregorian date this year.

  • Phizzy

    Have the WT ever tried to reconcile the contradictions between the Synoptics and John's Gospel on this ?

    There is a considerable difference in the timing of events between them. One account makes Jesus' use of the bread and wine apparently post Passover meal, the other account makes it happen before Passover day.

    I have seen some really complicated and convoluted arguments on-line by Bible Inerrantists to try to reconcile the two versions, but I simply wondered what the WT says on this disparity , if anything.

    If the problem is left unresolved by the WT, surely they cannot be dogmatic about when to "celebrate" ?

  • Quarterback

    This date is disputed by various religions aside from the WT society. I do not know exactly who is right, and why they agree some occasions with the Jews. But as soon as I finish my work on establishing world peace, I'll concentrate my efforts to this matter.

  • TD


    Jehovah's Witnesses (And kindred groups) have a theological "Need" for Jesus to be executed on the exact same calendar date as the passover lamb. (Nisan 14)

    The problem here is that an undetermined length of time elapsed between Jesus' arrest and his execution. He was questioned by Jewish religious leaders; he got sent to Pilate; he got sent to Herod; he got sent back to Pilate. Finally he was condemned and sent out to be executed.

    How long did that take? Personally I think it probably took several days. Pilate and Herod were important men who likely didn't drop everything everytime a criminal case needed to be heard.

    But even if you take the JW (And kindred groups) idea that it only took several hours, you still have to cram all the details of the passover celebration into an insanely short length of time right after the 14th has technically begun. And the reason this has to happen is because the next daylight period following the passover, when Jesus ostensibly goes before Pilate and Herod must still be the 14th. (Instead of the 15th as Numbers 33:3 plainly states.)

    In some ways this bears a passing resemblance to the 607 debate except that the calendar is only being rolled back one day instead of 19/20 years.

  • Phizzy

    The disparity between the Gospels, which you can count in hours, but amounts to a different calendar day, is surely no small thing to a nit-picking group like the W.T.

    I still wonder if they just ignore it, or have made some lame attempt to explain it ?

  • dozy

    It is just the WTBTS being pedantic and deliberately trying to be different , like they are in a lot of other areas. They are like a rebellious gothic teenager trying to annoy their parents and express their own individuality , but end up looking pretty silly.

    Cults like the JWs who regard themselves as the only true religion and all others to be Satanic have got to try to form some semblance of difference between themselves & other religions. USPs , as it were. So they define themselves as "having the truth" because they don't celebrate birthdays , throw confetti , or allow people with beards to become elders.

    What the society have done is decided in a lot of little petty Pharisaical ways that all other religions are wrong. Even when it becomes pretty obvious to everyone that they have got it wrong ( eg 607 ) , they have no choice but to grimly defend it.

  • Nathan Natas
    Nathan Natas

    So they've picked the wrong day for their meaningless ritual of rejection. ...again.

    Who's gonna be upset by that: the Universal Sovreign Yod-He-Vah-He, or The Flying Spaghetti Monster, Yod-He-Haw-He-Haw?

    The destiny of our immortal souls is at stake!

    The WORLD MIGHT END without you - and THEN what would you do? huh?


  • Quarterback

    TD, I appreciate what you are saying about the timing of all the events. i.e being tried by Pilatte, and Herod. Recently I read in a WT study article that there was pressure on both parties to conclude this matter before the next day. I don't remember specifically what the rationale was. I'll look into it for tomorrow.

  • Make Lemonade
    Make Lemonade

    Just wanted to thank you your contributions to this forum. I would say I cannot understand half of what you are talking about, but really it might be a much larger percentage than that. LOL

    Point is you have opened up to me a world of information that I previously had no idea existed.


Share this topic

Related Topics