Infant mortality rates - US versus other countries

by Bonnie_Clyde 5 Replies latest jw friends

  • Bonnie_Clyde
    Bonnie_Clyde

    Have you seen some of the figures that the US has a higher mortality rate than many other countries? Well, as we all know, figures don't lie, but liars figure. Here is a statement that I found on Wikipedia. I read something similar years ago. The statistics are comparing apples with oranges.

    [edit] Comparing infant mortality rates

    The infant mortality rate correlates very strongly with and is among the best predictors of state failure. [ 2 ] IMR is also a useful indicator of a country's level of health or development, and is a component of the physical quality of life index. Some claim that the method of calculating IMR may vary between countries based on the way they define a live birth. The World Health Organization (WHO) defines a live birth as any born human being who demonstrates independent signs of life, including breathing, voluntary muscle movement, or heartbeat.

    UNICEF uses a statistical methodology to account for reporting differences among countries. "UNICEF compiles infant mortality country estimates derived from all sources and methods of estimation obtained either from standard reports, direct estimation from micro data sets, or from UNICEF’s yearly exercise. In order to sort out differences between estimates produced from different sources, with different methods, UNICEF developed, in coordination with WHO, the WB and UNSD, an estimation methodology that minimizes the errors embodied in each estimate and harmonize trends along time. Since the estimates are not necessarily the exact values used as input for the model, they are often not recognized as the official IMR estimates used at the country level. However, as mentioned before, these estimates minimize errors and maximize the consistency of trends along time." [ 3 ]

    While the United States reports every case of infant mortality, it has been suggested that some other developed countries do not. A 2006 article in U.S. News & World Report claims that "First, it's shaky ground to compare U.S. infant mortality with reports from other countries. The United States counts all births as live if they show any sign of life, regardless of prematurity or size. This includes what many other countries report as stillbirths. In Austria and Germany, fetal weight must be at least 500 grams (1 pound) to count as a live birth; in other parts of Europe, such as Switzerland, the fetus must be at least 30 centimeters (12 inches) long. In Belgium and France, births at less than 26 weeks of pregnancy are registered as lifeless. [ 4 ] And some countries don't reliably register babies who die within the first 24 hours of birth. Thus, the United States is sure to report higher infant mortality rates. For this very reason, the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, which collects the European numbers, warns of head-to-head comparisons by country." [ 5 ] However, all of the countries named adopted the WHO definition in the late 1980s or early 1990s. [ 6 ]

    Historically, until the 1990s Russia and other countries of the former Soviet Union did not count as a live birth or as an infant death extremely premature infants (less than 1,000 g, less than 28 weeks gestational age, or less than 35 cm in length) that were born alive (breathed, had a heartbeat, or exhibited voluntary muscle movement) but failed to survive for at least 7 days. [ 7 ] Although such extremely premature infants typically accounted for only about 0.005 of all live-born children, their exclusion from both the numerator and the denominator in the reported IMR led to an estimated 22%-25% lower reported IMR. [ 8 ] In some cases, too, perhaps because hospitals or regional health departments were held accountable for lowering the IMR in their catchment area, infant deaths that occurred in the 12th month were "transferred" statistically to the 13th month (i.e., the second year of life), and thus no longer classified as an infant death. [ 9 ]

    Another challenge to comparability is the practice of counting frail or premature infants who die before the normal due date as miscarriages (spontaneous abortions) or those who die during or immediately after childbirth as stillborn. Therefore, the quality of a country's documentation of perinatal mortality can matter greatly to the accuracy of its infant mortality statistics. This point is reinforced by the demographer Ansley Coale, who finds dubiously high ratios of reported stillbirths to infant deaths in Hong Kong and Japan in the first 24 hours after birth, a pattern that is consistent with the high recorded sex ratios at birth in those countries and suggests not only that many female infants who die in the first 24 hours are misreported as stillbirths rather than infant deaths but also that those countries do not follow WHO recommendations for the reporting of live births and infant deaths. [ 10 ]

    Another seemingly paradoxical finding is that when countries with poor medical services introduce new medical centers and services, instead of declining the reported IMRs often increase for a time. The main cause of this is that improvement in access to medical care is often accompanied by improvement in the registration of births and deaths. Deaths that might have occurred in a remote or rural area and not been reported to the government might now be reported by the new medical personnel or facilities. Thus, even if the new health services reduce the actual IMR, the reported IMR may increase.

  • Bonnie_Clyde
    Bonnie_Clyde

    Sorry about the format - the main point I was trying to get across is the statement that "While the United States reports every case of infant mortality, it has been suggested that some other developed countries do not." Some countries don't even report an infant death unless it happens 24 hours or more after birth or if the baby is over a certain weight. I think this would skew the statistics, but the WT has a similar problem.

  • sammielee24
    sammielee24
    While the United States reports every case of infant mortality, it has been suggested that some other developed countries do not."

    But at the same time, it would disingenuous to believe that the USA doesn't skew it's figures contrary to the way other countries calculate their figures.

    For example, in the USA, unemployment stands reported currently at 8.2% across the country but they do not include any person not receiving unemployment benefits. There are in this economy, millions of people who have their hours cut back significantly and others who are working part time and who cannot find full time work. If those people ware also factored in, your unemployment would be more accurate at 15% of adults not working in full time jobs and thereby unable to sustain an acceptable standard of living. Ditto the poverty level - it's an absolute joke to set the poverty level at $10,000 for any person in this country but they do so by eliminating the very necessities of living such as food or electricity or medical care. Many countries use variable stats to set their own parameters and the reporting is done by a collective average to obtain the stats and that is where the infant mortality came in I believe. sammieswife.

  • Hittman
    Hittman

    For example, in the USA, unemployment stands reported currently at 8.2% across the country but they do not include any person not receiving unemployment benefits.
    Nor do they report people who are now working crappy minimum wage jobs in place of good paying jobs they've lost.

    But any numbers can be manipulated and lied about. And if it's coming from the UN, you can be absolutely certain there's a great deal of fiction mixed in with a smattering of fact.

  • BurnTheShips
    BurnTheShips

    What a smear! The UN always tells the truth.

    BTS

  • Hittman
    Hittman

    My apologies. I stand corrected.

    The UN always tells the truth
    The UN always tells the truth
    The UN always tells the truth
    The UN always tells the truth
    The UN always tells the truth

    I think I'm starting to believe that. . .

    Especially the WHO. They never lie. Nuh uh, not them, never ever.

    It's both sad and funny that so many people really believe this, and quote UN stats as if they have any relation to reality.

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit