MemberPostViewed: times
WingCommander  So is there a new stance on B-days or what? Someone please explain........


Greetings All!!

I have heard rumors on here and other places that JW's are now allowing birthdays to be observed/celebrated.  Is this true?  I hope so.  I never saw anything wrong with them, and missed that day more than anything else growing up as a JW.  I celebrated my first b-day this past summer.  I am 25.  I am going to allow b-days and Thanksgiving to be observed by my son.  I never missed other secular holidays at all to be honest.....just alot of BS "holiday cheer" that ended the day after, and the unnecessary spending of money.  I give gifts through the year.  Even my wife (a non-JW) envies me for that, and is quite honestly fed up with every month being another holiday.  (it's all BS made up to con people) 

So someone give me the full story, are B-days now allowed?  Considered ok?  Or just a "matter of conscience" for each to decide upon? 

Thanks in advance,

Wing Commander 
IP: 4fEr88FuiH9rFPd0
blondieRe: So is there a new stance on B-days or what? Someone please explain........

Officially, BDs are not okay according to the WTS.  I understand it is officially not a DFing offense but that doesn't stop some elders.  Of course, that doesn't stop some JWs from having a "special day" where a cake is made and gifts given but it is usually 6 months away from the "real" day.

Blondie
IP: zl5EysSoEqU0mKf9
Happy Guy :)Re: So is there a new stance on B-days or what? Someone please explain........

So someone give me the full story, are B-days now allowed? Considered ok? Or just a "matter of conscience" for each to decide upon?

Birthdays allowed? Hold on a second while I clean myself (laughed so hard I pissed my pants).

Celebrating a birthday would cause a JW to be bannished from eternal paradise and struck down without mercy by God at Armageddon. While they wait for that to happen they would be disfellowshipped and shunned. Now you tell me that the policy has changed from what has been occuring for the last hundred years? ....sorry....laughing again.

I don't know the answer to your question. Someone else here might. I guess anything is possible with the JWs and their leadership at the Watchtower. I mean, if they can tell you JWs for decades that the generation who were alive and witnessed the events of 1914 will also witness Armageddon, and, now that this generation has passed without Armageddon occuring, can tell you JWs that Armageddon really happened but it's just invisible.......well I guess they can change anything they want, any time they want, and do whatever they want regardless of how inconsistant it is. The donations will just keep rolling in.

BTW I just love decorating my Christmas tree and getting the house all lit up and pretty with the white snow as backdrop at Christmas time.  It only happens once a year.  Such a beautiful time of the year for family and friends for those who enjoy it.
IP: 1Ig6puBXCcTkSb5P by Happy Guy :): Correct formatting
by Happy Guy :): Correct formatting
BillygoatRe: So is there a new stance on B-days or what? Someone please explain........

I've wondered the same thing.  A couple years ago I was talking to my mother on the phone.  She was telling me how her and dad were taking my twin brothers out for a drink on their 21st birthday.  I said, "You're celebrating birthdays now?"  I was truly shocked.  She said, "No, no, no!  Of course not.  We just want to take them out for their first drink in a controlled environment."    Yeah right.  I said, "Come on mom.  Everybody drinks before they turn 21.  All of us did it.  Do you honestly think this will be their first drink ever?"  Paused silence.  "Well, I should think so.  They aren't legal until this Friday."  I imagine her covering her ears with her hands, closing her eyes, and going "Lalalalalalalalala".

*sigh*

As much as I love my step-mom, she has her head so far into the sand, it's just not even funny.
IP: yQoTHBXlGR//MOwa
gumbyRe: So is there a new stance on B-days or what? Someone please explain........

 There was an article not too long back about how christians need not worry about the origin of something that has no relevence today.....I don't remember where it was. Many took this as a green light that birthdays were  ok, but it seems the article hinted that those celebrations "directly" mentioned in the bible were not ok.

Imagine the confusion to school teachers if birthdays were allowed......"little Tommy couldn't stay in the classroom and eat cake with the kids last year.....but this year he can"

Birthdays are not allowed as far as I know.....you just do it quietly.

Gumby
IP: hmwkr7FvGiFrzLtR
Midget-SasquatchRe: So is there a new stance on B-days or what? Someone please explain........

Whenever the WTS tries to be (IMHO feigns to be) undogmatic in their publications, its just a tactic to counter the criticisms they receive. Be it a court, or a government agency, whatever.....one can point to the ambiguous writings in the literature and argue that the WTS isn't such a controlling/oppressive cult etc....Meanwhile, all the unwritten content, and the social controls still stand and go by whatever the current view is...which as far as I know is still viewed as a no-no...I wouldn't be surprised though if a dub parent who's in a tough custody battle would be overlooked by an elder body and not reproved if she gave her children birthday parties that year.

IP: Qx3Adlzhd0SIhvPO by Midget-Sasquatch: Correct formatting
Happy Guy :)Re: So is there a new stance on B-days or what? Someone please explain........

Imagine the confusion to school teachers if birthdays were allowed......"little Tommy couldn't stay in the classroom and eat cake with the kids last year.....but this year he can"

Imagine the confusion for little Tommy.

and Sasquatch: Good post your dead on including the last comment...I personally experienced the scenerio you painted when I went through that a little over a decade ago. It was done to act as a "we are normal and celebrate b-days to" measure in court and it was sanctioned by the HQ lawyers in Canada who represented her just because it would be a good legal counter-point.
IP: 1Ig6puBXCcTkSb5P by Happy Guy :): Correct formatting
by Happy Guy :): Correct formatting
XQsThaiPoesRe: Re: So is there a new stance on B-days or what? Someone please explain........

Ill tell you the truth.

Yes and No.

Yes they said (this july) that birthdays and x-mas and other holidays were okay if they did not have pagan rituals connected with them in your neck of the woods (I guess that depends on your view of pagan). That noted JWs in my area have did memorial day, 4th of july (going to fire works shows), thanks giving, and B-days sans fan fair and decorations for a while. Graduations oddly are celebrated like birthdays and can get quite wild.  Baptisms were celebrated in simular fashion until the CO threw the book are us. I guess it is the decorations that must be pagan. In an odd twist worldly people are abandoning holloween.

Officially I believe it is for the jw's concience to decide as long as it does not stumble anyone in the area (including wordly people). Since stumbling people can get you DFed it is more about does anyone know about it or object to it where you live.

Thats the real truth people celebrate what they can get away with. Usually with out decoratioons so they don't have to destroy incriminating evidence. Reminds me of the stories of bookstudys in banned lands. Where they would put up decorations so if they got caught they would say it was a birthday.
IP: AyfudgwDwu6qeJpb
amacRe: So is there a new stance on B-days or what? Someone please explain........

I don't think there is a new stance...as someone mentioned a few months back there was an article that basically said if something no longer had pagan connections it is OK. It's main example was the use of Pinatas and how that is OK nowadays. The article then went on to specifically mention B-Days as things to avoid, so as usual it was quite contradictory.

We were "reported" for letting our kids go to a b-day party, the funny thing is, when the elders met with us, they barely mentioned it. They were more interested in our service time and meeting attendance.
IP: g/Y2ACuvJF+ODlz+
XQsThaiPoesRe: Re: So is there a new stance on B-days or what? Someone please explain........
Amac there was a QFR that said it was a conscience issue if there is no modern pagan connections. The thing is the QFR fromover 10 years ago was different and totally ruled out any personal choice. So there has been a change. How much of a change in the day to day lives of JW is hard to gauge.
IP: AyfudgwDwu6qeJpb by XQsThaiPoes: Correct formatting
by XQsThaiPoes: Correct formatting
DogpatchRe: So is there a new stance on B-days or what? Someone please explain........

Can anyone scan that article from July? Or send one to me? I haven't seen it.

thanks,

Randy Watters

Net Soup! http://www.freeminds.org

 
IP: 1tNIVEitlfhqFG+M
blondieRe: So is there a new stance on B-days or what? Someone please explain........

I don't think this article addressed birthdays but rather luaus (or another one addressed pinatas).  The prinicples they seemed to cite could be applied to birthdays by ex-JWs.  But remember how hypocritcal the WTS is.  I can check but I think those are the topics to look under, luaus and pinatas not birthdays.

No, birthdays are forbidden to JWs and any who try to apply the info from these articles will find themselves being interrogated by 2 elders although I have been old that BDs are not necessarily grounds for DFing.

Blondie
IP: zl5EysSoEqU0mKf9
catchthisRe: So is there a new stance on B-days or what? Someone please explain........
 

*** g03 9/22 pp. 23-24 The Piñata?An Ancient Tradition ***

The
Piñata Today

Later, the piñata became part of the festivities of the posadas during the Christmas season and continues as such to this day. (A star-shaped piñata is used to represent the star that guided the astrologers to Bethlehem.) Breaking the piñata is also considered indispensable at birthday parties. Indeed, piñatas have become so traditionally Mexican that Mexico even exports them to other countries.

We found that for many people in Mexico, the piñata has lost its religious significance and is considered by most to be just harmless fun. In fact, piñatas are used in Mexico on many festive occasions, not just for the posadas or for birthdays. And piñatas can be purchased in many forms other than the traditional star shape. They are sometimes made to resemble animals, flowers, clowns.

When considering whether to include a piñata at a social gathering, Christians should be sensitive to the consciences of others. (1 Corinthians 10:31-33) A main concern is, not what the practice meant hundreds of years ago, but how it is viewed today in your area. Understandably, opinions may vary from one place to another. Hence, it is wise to avoid turning such matters into big issues. The Bible says: "Let each one keep seeking, not his own advantage, but that of the other person."?1 Corinthians 10:24.

 

The large bolded phrase above is the most interesting statement ever made by the Society regarding "pagan" or "religious" customs.  The article explained the origination of piñatas and how they are very much tied to Christmas and birthday celebrations, particularly Christmas.  BUT, as the phrase mentions above, it doesn't matter how the piñata was tied to Christmas hundreds of years ago.  It is how it is viewed today by the general population of Mexicans.  It is just a fun thing to have and do.

Similarly, you can easily apply this phrase to just about ANY other worldly celebration that witnesses do not participate in.  Birthdays included.  What did the practice of birthday celebrations mean hundreds of years ago?  How are they viewed in your area today?  It is not how they are viewed by witnesses in your area today, it means the general population of the area in which you live.

Personally, I think they allowed piñatas because the Mexican contingient of brothers and sisters is one of the fastest growing segments of the organization.  Any converts which come from Mexico are most likely Catholic and they tend to want to keep some of their traditions that have been part of their families for generations.  Christmas is HUGE in Mexico.  Piñatas are HUGE during Christmas.  Christmas just isn't Christmas without them.  Even at witness get-togethers, piñatas were banned.  The reason for the ban was because of their Christmas background.  Now it is OK?  Go figure.
IP: DTTOa2qLsng22NLU
RunningManRe: So is there a new stance on B-days or what? Someone please explain........

Although birthdays are still considered sinful, I have noticed a bit of softening among individuals.

For instance, a couple of years ago, an elder in my cong and his wife turned 50.  They mentioned they had received cards from a ministerial servant in our cong.  The cards were scrupulously non-birthday cards, but they did recognize the milestone of passing a significant date, which just happened to be a birthdate.  The elder and his wife had sent similar cards to the MS and his wife, previously.  I got the impression that they all thought the birthday ban was pretty stupid, but didn't quite have the nerve to buck anything.
IP: 5cpBuqxqNhLQsNyC
RunningManRe: So is there a new stance on B-days or what? Someone please explain........
Imagine the confusion to school teachers if birthdays were allowed......
My kids were quite good at confusing teachers.  For example, when Harry Potter was being read to the class, a JW boy in my daughter's school had to sit in the hallway, whereas we allowed our daughter to stay.  I told to her explain that they were orthodox JWs and we were reformed.
IP: 5cpBuqxqNhLQsNyC
booker-tRe: So is there a new stance on B-days or what? Someone please explain........
I have always wondered about this myself.  When I was growing up Birthdays, Halloween,  Christmas, Thanksgiving, 4th fo July etc; were all forbidden.  I don't know if they were disfellowshipping acts but I did hear of a sister that was put on "public reproof" for having christmas lights in her house.  I think holidays has always been frowned upon just like R-rated movies but I don't think a JW would be Df'd for going to a R-rated movie.  He will probably be removed as an elder or MS not allowed to give talks etc;  I think the same thing with Holidays and BDs.  My mom has always said "Happy BD" on my birthdays.
IP: yHbNW1usiiQEpgnC
XQsThaiPoesRe: Re: So is there a new stance on B-days or what? Someone please explain........
someone post the july 04 QFR it addresses B-days directly.
IP: AyfudgwDwu6qeJpb
blondieRe: So is there a new stance on B-days or what? Someone please explain........

Notice how the WTS avoids answering this reader's question:  How are they different from other celebrations that have pagan origins (translation:  BDs and/or Xmas) but simply have been adopted by modern cultures to be a family fun gathering?

***
g03 4/8 p. 30 From Our Readers ***

Luaus
I read with interest your article "Let?s Have a Hawaiian Luau." (June 8, 2002) Several years ago I attended a luau in Hawaii. I felt there were strong religious and spiritistic overtones. Even if luaus today do not involve religious or spiritistic aspects, how are they different from other celebrations that have pagan origins but simply have been adopted by modern cultures to be a family fun gathering?

L. F., United States

"Awake!"
responds: As noted there in our footnote on page 24, while the luau may at one time have had a connection with false religious practices, the word now has simply come to refer to a Hawaiian banquet. A specific gathering to which the word "luau" is applied may or may not be appropriate for a Christian to attend. As in all aspects of life, Christians should make decisions that will leave them with a clear conscience before Jehovah God.?1 Timothy 1:5, 19; see also the January 8, 2000, issue of "Awake!" pages 26-7.

***
g02 6/8 Let?s Have a Hawaiian Luau ***

[Footnote]

Although the luau may originally have had some connection with false religious practices, the word has simply come to refer to a Hawaiian banquet. Many Christians may therefore conscientiously feel that they can participate.

 
IP: w4dCPI+x3yjHjrD5
CorvinRe: So is there a new stance on B-days or what? Someone please explain........

If a Jehovah's Witnesses are aloud to celebrate their wedding anniversaries because marriage is "God's institution", then I can celebrate the anniversary of my children's birth because child birth is also "God's institution".

Corvin
IP: WU+pfTLho7FSjZBt
blondieRe: So is there a new stance on B-days or what? Someone please explain........

There is no July 4 WT, only July 1 and July 15, 2004.

July 1 QFR::  At 2 Corinthians 6:14, to whom is Paul referring when he uses the term "unbelievers"?

July 15 QFR:  What is foreshadowed by the arrangement of the Jubilee year mentioned in the 25th chapter of Leviticus?

There is no QFR in the Awakes dated July 8 and 22.

????????

 
IP: w4dCPI+x3yjHjrD5