This site contains some very disturbing articles, video footage, and photographs regarding the 9/11 tragedy. Although it's very fascinating, if its' contents are to be believed, it's terribly unnerving.
What do you think?
Country Girl
by Country Girl 8 Replies latest social current
This site contains some very disturbing articles, video footage, and photographs regarding the 9/11 tragedy. Although it's very fascinating, if its' contents are to be believed, it's terribly unnerving.
What do you think?
Country Girl
Country Girl, is it very graphic? If so i can't look at it.
Looks like more conspiracy non-sense.
Actually, KL.. it's just footage slowed down of the planes hitting the towers, which we've all seen time and again. CNN footage, articles, things like that. Nothing you can't handle, I'm positive!
Country Girl
I am not sure what i think. There will always be speculation of one theory or another.
In the video, you can see a flash from the plane a second or two before it hits the tower. However, the 'pod' claim is hard to maintain. For instance, have a look at this picture http://www.airliners.net/open.file/436887/L/ But, i could be wrong on this.
The plane in it has what might be construed as 'pods' underneath. Considering that in the original plane picture w the claimed pod, the plane is tilting at an engle, it could highlight one of those bulges.
However, if i had a chance, i would watch the 'plane site' video, as there are many things, still unsatisfactorily explained about the wtc 9-11 tragedy.
S
Satanus:
I do see the bulge underneath there.. that's pretty interesting. I wonder what that flash could be before it hits the tower, if not a "pre" explosion. I'd be interested in seeing any other sites anyone might have regarding this video footage.
Country Girl
These conspiracy theorists employ a deceptively clever and oft-used tactic - they show the exact same footage we've all seen and simply declare them to show something suspicious. See that fuzzy area of the picture where they've stuck an arrow? That's a missile pod. The "artifacts" introduced by zooming in on a low-resolution digital image become "jet fuel spray" released before impact. The nose of the plane hitting the tower before the wings becomes a "missile launch 1/3 second before impact". Because the windows can't be seen in such a low-resolution picture, the plane "has no windows". And so on.
Not really worth bothering about, but good as an exercise in practical skepticism.
They act lik they've never seen light glent off an airplane before. Oh yeah! That's an "explosion" alright!