A peek into the history of fanatical BLOOD DOCTRINE origins

by Terry 19 Replies latest watchtower beliefs

  • Terry
    Terry

    SECTION ONE

    Is Watchtower doctrine on BLOOD transfusions rooted in one or more of the following?:

    1. The Law of Moses binding only on Jews not Gentiles

    2. The Law of the Sons of Noah (Noachian Law) given to mankind after the flood.

    3. Arbitrary convictions stemming from crackpot Clayton J. Woodworth who influenced Judge Rutherford.*

    _________ _____________ ____________________

    Let us begin with #3. first. . .

    _________ _____________ ____________________

    Clayton J. Woodworth, co-author of the infamous seventh volume of Studies in the Scriptures, "The Finished Mystery" (1917). In 1919 he became editor of a magazine called "The Golden Age," which is now known as Awake!

    Woodworth was, to be as fair as possible, the king of all looney birds.

    The Golden Age became a forum for the most extravagant claims about science. And above all, Woodworth was a champion of his very special ideas about medicine and health. The Bible Students could enjoy a steady stream of health advice, each stranger than the next:

    "There is no food that is right food for the morning meal. At breakfast is no time to break a fast. Keep up the daily fast until the noon hour... Drink plenty of water two hours after each meal; drink none just before eating; and a small quantity if any at meal time. Good buttermilk is a health drink at meal times and in between. Do not take a bath until two hours after eating a meal, nor closer than one hour before eating. Drink a full glass of water both before and after the bath." (Golden Age, Sept. 9, 1925, pp. 784-785)

    "The earlier in the forenoon you take the sun bath, the greater will be the beneficial effect, because you get more of the ultra-violet rays, which are healing" (Golden Age, Sept. 13, 1933, p. 777)

    Doctors as agents of Satan

    "We do well to bear in mind that among the drugs, serums, vaccines, surgical operations, etc., of the medical profession, there is nothing of value save an occasional surgical procedure. . . . Readers of The Golden Age know the unpleasant truth about the clergy; they should also know the truth about the medical profession, which sprang from the same demon worshipping shamans (doctor priests) as did the doctors of divinity." (Golden Age, Aug. 5, 1931 pp. 727-728)

    _________ _____________ ____________________

    The magazine Golden Age (AWAKE!) took aim at vaccines and pulled the trigger! A mindless nincompoopery against

    germs, disease, aluminum cookware and such brought Jehovah's Witnesses into a dangerous zone of vulnerability and put a burden of belief

    on simple folk with not much education who believed such information was coming as a special warning from Jehovah.

    _________ _____________ ____________________

    "Thinking people would rather have smallpox than vaccination, because the latter sows seeds of syphilis, cancers, eczema, erysipelas, scrofula, consumption, even leprosy and many other loathsome affections. Hence the practice of vaccinations is a crime, an outrage, and a delusion" (Golden Age, Jan. 5,1929, p. 502)

    Yes, a vaccination was "a crime" and was sometimes likened to a rape (like JWs today say about blood transfusions). Moreover, like almost everything else it has been used as a "sign of the last days:"

    "Vaccination never prevented anything and never will, and is the most barbarous practice. . . . We are in the last days; and the devil is slowly losing his hold, making a strenuous effort meanwhile to do all the damage he can, and to his credit can such evils be placed. . . . Use your rights as American citizens to forever abolish the devilish practice of vaccinations." (Golden Age, Oct. 12, 1921, p. 17)

    _________ _____________ ____________________

    This sort of thing eventually emboldened the Society to stretch things even farther into the crazy zone. Blood transfusions were the next target.

    _________ _____________ ____________________

    Woodworths primary argument against vaccinations seems to have been that this was "animal filth" that would "pollute" humanity. According to The Golden Age, vaccinations not only caused all kind of dreadful diseases, including the Spanish Flu, it even retarded the intellect of men and caused moral bankruptcy:

    "..much looseness of our day along sexual lines may be traceable to the easy and continual violation of the divine commands to keep human and animal blood apart from each other. With cells of foreign blood racing through his veins a man is not normal, not himself, but lacks the poise and balance which makes for self control." (Golden Age, Febr. 4, 1931, p. 293)

    We will see exactly the same argument applied to organ transplants and blood transfusions later!

    Most interestingly, the WTS did, in the same magazine, give some "Biblical" arguments for refusing vaccinations:

    "Vaccination is a direct violation of the everlasting covenant that God made with Noah after the flood." (ibid.)

    Woodworths primary argument against vaccinations seems to have been that this was "animal filth" that would "pollute" humanity. According to The Golden Age, vaccinations not only caused all kind of dreadful diseases, including the Spanish Flu, it even retarded the intellect of men and caused moral bankruptcy:

    "..much looseness of our day along sexual lines may be traceable to the easy and continual violation of the divine commands to keep human and animal blood apart from each other. With cells of foreign blood racing through his veins a man is not normal, not himself, but lacks the poise and balance which makes for self control." (Golden Age, Febr. 4, 1931, p. 293)

    We will see exactly the same argument applied to organ transplants and blood transfusions later!

    *Notes:

    The information in this section and the following builds on Prof. M. James Penton's Apocalypse Delayed - The Story of Jehovah's Witnesses (University of Toronto Press, 1985), and on extensive quotations and comments published by Jan Haugland and Ken Raines.

  • Terry
    Terry

    SECTION TWO

    As of 1961, vaccinations were still "wrong," but not enough for the Society to risk legal responsibility. Vaccinations were called "contamination," but were not --and please take note of this point-- considered a nourishing process.

    The fact that taking vaccinations and serums is not the same as eating blood is a "comfort" and leaves the matter in the hands of the individual or so the Watchtower Society says.

    This is not the case, alas, with blood transfusions. To this day the blood prohibition is based on the Watchtower Society's claim that a blood transfusion is the same as eating blood:

    "A patient in the hospital may be fed through the mouth, through the nose, or through the veins. When sugar solutions are given intravenously, it is called intravenous feeding. So the hospital's own terminology recognizes as feeding the process of putting nutrition into one's system via the veins. Hence the attendant administering the transfusion is feeding the patient blood through the veins, and the patient receiving it is eating it through his veins." (The Watchtower, July 1, 1951, p. 415)

    Again we must keep in mind that the people making these claims are the same who years earlier had stated that "thinking people would rather have smallpox than vaccination," and argued that a tonsillectomy was worse than suicide with a case knife! Their medical expertise should be taken with a grain of salt, to put it mildly, and there is no evidence that their understanding of the Bible was any better. In one case The Golden Age discovered that the Hebrew expression for "one language" in Genesis 11:1 literally means "one lip", so, the magazine concluded: "Their lip must have been shaped in the same general manner..." (July 13, 1927, p. 663)

    _______________ _______________________ ______________________

    A person standing on quicksand begins to sink they more he struggles to escape.

    The same might be said of the mentally ill masterminds behind the medical policies of the Watchtower organization.

    Am I being too harsh in saying that? Or, should we consider their implausible and foolhardy published comments and admonitions as proof enough?

    As time went by, the Watchtower issued fiats and edicts like a Pope and College of Cardinals possessing infallibility!

    _______________ _______________________ ______________________

    The blood prohibition gradually became a JW institution. A long series of rules and regulations concerning blood has been issued over the years, of which these are examples:

    • JWs are obliged to check with their butcher if there is any chance that the meat sold comes from animals not properly bled. Further, they will have to find out which words are used for blood products in their local area, and check with the manufacturer if in doubt. (The Watchtower, Nov. 1, 1961, p. 669)
    • The JW must ensure that fish is properly bled (ibid.)
    • JWs cannot feed their pets with food that contains blood, neither can a pet receive a blood transfusion (The Watchtower, Febr. 15, 1964, p. 127)
    • JWs cannot allow a leech to feed on their own blood (The Watchtower, June 15, 1982, p. 31)
    • JWs cannot use fertiliser containing blood (The Watchtower, Oct. 15, 1981 p. 31)
    • A JW owning a store is not allowed to sell blood products (The Watchtower, July 15, 1982, p. 26)
    • JWs can not store their own blood before an operation (The Watchtower, March 1, 1989, p. 31)

    Add to this the fact that over the years a number of specialised rules have been issued specifying which blood components are illegal and which are a "matter of conscience," and which medical procedures involving blood are illegal and which are a "matter of conscience." You can see why this is a complicated field for a JW who wishes to remain loyal to the WTS.

    And loyal they must be. If a JW decides to save his, his spouse's or his children's lives contrary to Watchtower rules, he would be disfellowshipped from the congregation, which would force his friends and family to shun him.

    " In view of the seriousness of taking blood into the human system by a transfusion, would violation of the Holy Scriptures in this regard subject the dedicated, baptized receiver of blood transfusion to being disfellowshiped from the Christian congregation?

    The inspired Holy Scriptures answer yes." (The Watchtower, Jan. 15, 1961, p. 63)

    The blood prohibition gradually became a JW institution. A long series of rules and regulations concerning blood has been issued over the years, of which these are examples:

    • JWs are obliged to check with their butcher if there is any chance that the meat sold comes from animals not properly bled. Further, they will have to find out which words are used for blood products in their local area, and check with the manufacturer if in doubt. (The Watchtower, Nov. 1, 1961, p. 669)
    • The JW must ensure that fish is properly bled (ibid.)
    • JWs cannot feed their pets with food that contains blood, neither can a pet receive a blood transfusion (The Watchtower, Febr. 15, 1964, p. 127)
    • JWs cannot allow a leech to feed on their own blood (The Watchtower, June 15, 1982, p. 31)
    • JWs cannot use fertiliser containing blood (The Watchtower, Oct. 15, 1981 p. 31)
    • A JW owning a store is not allowed to sell blood products (The Watchtower, July 15, 1982, p. 26)
    • JWs can not store their own blood before an operation (The Watchtower, March 1, 1989, p. 31)

    Add to this the fact that over the years a number of specialised rules have been issued specifying which blood components are illegal and which are a "matter of conscience," and which medical procedures involving blood are illegal and which are a "matter of conscience." You can see why this is a complicated field for a JW who wishes to remain loyal to the WTS.

    And loyal they must be. If a JW decides to save his, his spouse's or his children's lives contrary to Watchtower rules, he would be disfellowshipped from the congregation, which would force his friends and family to shun him.

    " In view of the seriousness of taking blood into the human system by a transfusion, would violation of the Holy Scriptures in this regard subject the dedicated, baptized receiver of blood transfusion to being disfellowshiped from the Christian congregation?

    The inspired Holy Scriptures answer yes." (The Watchtower, Jan. 15, 1961, p. 63)

    In case someone might consider breaking this rule in secret, he can be sure God will not let him get away with it. The WTS intimated that God would punish parents for a blood transfusion by letting their child be stillborn! And if the child should live, they would all eventually die at Armageddon:

    "Lifesaving efforts by unscriptural means can never produce results of lasting good. How foolish it is to think that one can save life by violating the laws of the Life-giver! While it may produce seemingly beneficial results at the moment, it may ultimately take its toll in disease and stillborn children as a direct result of such an ill-advised course. Even if no physical harm results to the patient or to ones offspring, violation of the law of God seriously jeopardizes one's opportunity to gain eternal life in God's new world." (The Watchtower, Sept. 15, 1961, p. 565)

    ___________________- _______________________ ________________________________

    And, like some crazed Energizer Bunny of quackery, the Society kept making things up which made things worse and worse and worse.

    Heart and organ transplants became the equivalent of CANNIBALISM!

    Notes:

    The information in this section and the following builds on Prof. M. James Penton's Apocalypse Delayed - The Story of Jehovah's Witnesses (University of Toronto Press, 1985), and on extensive quotations and comments published by Jan Haugland and Ken Raines.

  • Terry
    Terry

    We have to take pause to reflect on early efforts by former JW's such as Jan Haugland who did incredible research into things not previously made public about the dishonesty of the Watchtower.

    Material such as above and many other insights and expose's have come at a bitter cost to ex-JW's in the early days.

    WikiLeaks reported the following:

    Watchtower Takes Legal Action Against Ex-Members
    EX-JWS SUMMONED TO POLICE STATION
    In a bold move aimed at suppressing dissident Jehovah’s Witnesses, the Watchtower Society’s New York headquarters has filed charges with the police against ex-members Kent Steinhaug and Jan Haugland of Norway. Steinhaug reported for questioning this morning (March 4, 1997) to the police station in Skein, his home town.
    Both men are accused of violating copyright laws by posting copies of a secret elder’s manual on the Internet. The manual "Pay Attention to Yourselves and to All the Flock" tells local elders how to conduct closed-door trials and other actions controlling the personal lives of Jehovah’s Witnesses.
    Among the rules enforced through the manual are forced shunning of family members who leave the sect and the requirement that Witnesses refuse blood transfusions regardless of the consequences in loss of life.
    The charges filed against Steinhaug and Haugland allege that they have made the secret manual available to rank-and-file members and to the general public, in violation of a copyright held by the Watchtower Bible and Tract Society. Only Witness elders are allowed to read the book, and an elder must surrender his personal copy if he loses his position in the organization.
  • Band on the Run
    Band on the Run

    I had no idea! Of course, I recall when we had to check that the family fish in the aquarium had not been eating blood. There were a lot of ingredients in dime store fish food. My father had a crazy hatred of aluminum. I was only vaccined b/c his permission was not sought. My mom must have forged his signature.

    If something was not newi in my time, I never questioned how it came to be. The Witnesses had theri crazies from the get go. I wonder how many people refused vaccines. My father refused the polio oral vaccine the Sabin. The entire neighborhood went to the local school to get it one night. I was so happy that I did not get an injection. I touched the sugar cube, however, and worried that I would give my father polio.

    I also notice that if something happens in ancient days in the Holy Land I do give it more credence than an angel of the Lord showing Joseph Smith the golden tablets in Westchester, NY (north of NYC). The Witnesses have a problem b/c the religion is so relatively recent and documented. I am very grateful to Penton and other academics who devoted their efforts to fact checking and analyzing the WTBTS. So few Witnesses question anything about the Society. I doubt most know the names on the Governing Body.

    Why can't limit their statements the way courts do. Determine something on very narrow grounds. Retain flexibility. If more people knew of this history, how many would still turn down a blood transufsion? I do know many.

  • dropoffyourkeylee
    dropoffyourkeylee

    Forgive me for coming late to the discussion, but has anyone ever addressed any connection of the WT blood preoccupation with the 1931 Dracula movie with Bela Lugosi? The later genre of vampire literature doesn't feature blood tranfusions much, nor did the original Bram Stoker novel that I recall, but the 1931 movie had a very memorable scene in which the heroine received a blood transfusion which was spoken of as 'feeding'. The entire movie was based on the idea of 'feeding on blood', which in turn was based on the Victorian sensiblilities of the 1890's, which now is seen as as a substitute for 'fluids', ie. it's all a sexual metaphor. After I saw the original movie, I have wondered if the early WT leader, whoever it was, that came up with this insane doctrine, had seen the movie and was influenced by it.

    Just a thought. Has anyone else commented on this before?

  • Vanderhoven7
    Vanderhoven7

    Excellent work Terry

  • clarity
  • carla
    carla

    marking

  • donny
    donny

    Thanks for the great post Terry!!!

  • designs
    designs

    Woodworth should have been sued along with the Wt. for discouraging vaccinations. We had parents in our KH well into the 1980s who kept vaccinations from their children based on this old Wt. crap.

    Practicing medicine without a license.

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit