KateWild

Joined

• started 154 topics
• posted 6,385 times   see topics posted on
• send a message

Posts by KateWild

• 
  113

  Matthew Powner- Advanced research on the Origin of life. How credible is he?

  by KateWild in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  i have come to the conclusion that science cannot prove or disprove the existence of god.

  however the scientific evidence available is compelling enough for me to believe that a creator is responsible for life on earth.. i have read much about powner and understand the work he is doing.

  i am interested in your views as to his credibility.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  KateWild

  Grasping at straws.-cofty

  Lol!!! perhaps for you. Hence my conclusion. It's all a matter of perspective cofty. I listened to Krauss BTW, not bad. Kate xx
• 
  113

  Matthew Powner- Advanced research on the Origin of life. How credible is he?

  by KateWild in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  i have come to the conclusion that science cannot prove or disprove the existence of god.

  however the scientific evidence available is compelling enough for me to believe that a creator is responsible for life on earth.. i have read much about powner and understand the work he is doing.

  i am interested in your views as to his credibility.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  KateWild

  Would you please explain, what is a "creator" for you? Exactly what difference or how important this "creator" is?-MG

  The Creator is a deity responsible for the creation of the world, cosmos and universe. Important to me becase I like to know how things work and believing a creator is responsible fuels my enquirey that one day I might get some concrete proof either way of his existence. But for now I believe until I am proved otherwise.

  Kate xx
• 
  113

  Matthew Powner- Advanced research on the Origin of life. How credible is he?

  by KateWild in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  i have come to the conclusion that science cannot prove or disprove the existence of god.

  however the scientific evidence available is compelling enough for me to believe that a creator is responsible for life on earth.. i have read much about powner and understand the work he is doing.

  i am interested in your views as to his credibility.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  KateWild

  Great on sunday afternoons usually live music and london old fashioned charm.-galaxie

  Are you in London too, are you going to come for a meetup?

  Kate xx
• 
  113

  Matthew Powner- Advanced research on the Origin of life. How credible is he?

  by KateWild in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  i have come to the conclusion that science cannot prove or disprove the existence of god.

  however the scientific evidence available is compelling enough for me to believe that a creator is responsible for life on earth.. i have read much about powner and understand the work he is doing.

  i am interested in your views as to his credibility.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  KateWild

  Viv,

  In my opinion having a conclusion, is not making a claim, having a belief is not making a claim. I have expressed multiple times that the evidence is soley for me not proof to anyone else. But I can understand why you can't grasp any of what I am saying, you need concrete facts to satisfy your curiosity and you get irritated when you don't have any concrete proof.

  I on the other hand have the ability to make higher order abstractions and that's part of my thinking process. To understand this you have to think out of the box Viv. Hydrogen bonds should not be possible in nature, but they are there, hydrogen and oxygen do not bond like this in organic molecules. This is an example of a guided process to me, but perhaps not to another chemical analyst. I am satisfied this process is guided by God, other chemical analysts may not be. They may think it's a natural process.

  So in conclusion science in the case of hydrogen bonds proves nothing as reagrds to the existence of God

  Kate xx
• 
  27

  How did you teach your kids TTATT? How old were they?

  by KateWild in

  1. watchtower
  2. bible

  when i first started going on "other" jw websites my head was spinning so i didn't say anything to my kids about what i had read.

  steve hassan's material helped a lot it was when i read that, that i realised i need to free my kids.. i got a lot of advice from jwn too.. my daughter had moved cities and went to the hall we used to visit frequently.

  things changed when she became a member instead of just a visitor.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  KateWild

  KM,

  It's good that his dad is not harline about your son's associations. You might be surprised but hubby might actually be open to TTATT, just small things at first though. Maybe beards or somehting that he will benefit from if it wasn't a rule.

  As far as your son is concerned, l hope he gets to go to prom. Some JWs here in the UK went to theirs, one was even prom queen!!!!

  Kate xx
• 
  113

  Matthew Powner- Advanced research on the Origin of life. How credible is he?

  by KateWild in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  i have come to the conclusion that science cannot prove or disprove the existence of god.

  however the scientific evidence available is compelling enough for me to believe that a creator is responsible for life on earth.. i have read much about powner and understand the work he is doing.

  i am interested in your views as to his credibility.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  KateWild

  Viv, spamming again. I have answered your question already. I haven't actually made any claims. Are you entirely sure you have read all my posts on this thread? Is it possible you could have missed my explaination of my perspective?
• 
  113

  Matthew Powner- Advanced research on the Origin of life. How credible is he?

  by KateWild in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  i have come to the conclusion that science cannot prove or disprove the existence of god.

  however the scientific evidence available is compelling enough for me to believe that a creator is responsible for life on earth.. i have read much about powner and understand the work he is doing.

  i am interested in your views as to his credibility.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  KateWild

  Viv, just hang on. I have a PM. I'll be back in a sec xxxx
• 
  113

  Matthew Powner- Advanced research on the Origin of life. How credible is he?

  by KateWild in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  i have come to the conclusion that science cannot prove or disprove the existence of god.

  however the scientific evidence available is compelling enough for me to believe that a creator is responsible for life on earth.. i have read much about powner and understand the work he is doing.

  i am interested in your views as to his credibility.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  KateWild

  Viv, Priceless!!!!!! hahahahaha so now you're spamming the thread by posting the same thing multiple times. You've got ASD too mister I suggest you research it instead of spamming this thread.
• 
  113

  Matthew Powner- Advanced research on the Origin of life. How credible is he?

  by KateWild in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  i have come to the conclusion that science cannot prove or disprove the existence of god.

  however the scientific evidence available is compelling enough for me to believe that a creator is responsible for life on earth.. i have read much about powner and understand the work he is doing.

  i am interested in your views as to his credibility.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  KateWild

  Viv, nothing you say is relevant or sensible I have answered you. Stop being silly. You are just making a fool of yourself hahahhahahahaha! but I am having fun LOL
• 
  113

  Matthew Powner- Advanced research on the Origin of life. How credible is he?

  by KateWild in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  i have come to the conclusion that science cannot prove or disprove the existence of god.

  however the scientific evidence available is compelling enough for me to believe that a creator is responsible for life on earth.. i have read much about powner and understand the work he is doing.

  i am interested in your views as to his credibility.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  KateWild

  Getting back to topic and the OP Again

  I have come to the conclusion that science cannot prove or disprove the existence of God. However the scientific evidence available is compelling enough for me to believe that a Creator is responsible for life on earth. I have shown my scientific perspective in past posts.

  No one yet has shown me how my conclusion is wrong.

  Kate xx