http://www.islamicweb.com/history/chronology.htm
according to a pro-islam website... islam?s history is filled with conquest and violence.
i was intrigued by another posters post about how the crusades were in response to the muslims invading the western world... so i had to do my own research to see if this was actually true.. as it turns out, the muslims have a habit of trying to take over the world.
To answer your two questions:
The bigger question is would the Muslims use Nukes on us if they could?
Islamist extremists may but the Muslims in my apartment building are all opposed to terrorism. Which one qualifies as a Muslim?
Would the Muslims destroy us by any means, if they could?
Some would want to, some wouldn't. A bit like there are some Christians would want to destry Islam, and some wouldn't.
http://www.islamicweb.com/history/chronology.htm
according to a pro-islam website... islam?s history is filled with conquest and violence.
i was intrigued by another posters post about how the crusades were in response to the muslims invading the western world... so i had to do my own research to see if this was actually true.. as it turns out, the muslims have a habit of trying to take over the world.
My question was whether or not you agreed with Crazy. Do you?
http://www.islamicweb.com/history/chronology.htm
according to a pro-islam website... islam?s history is filled with conquest and violence.
i was intrigued by another posters post about how the crusades were in response to the muslims invading the western world... so i had to do my own research to see if this was actually true.. as it turns out, the muslims have a habit of trying to take over the world.
Thi Chi
I'm unclear as to what your answer to my question was. Is the annhilation of Muslim nations something you are in favour of?
i have been in a relationship for about 2-1/2 years now, and it seems that every time we have an argument or disagreement, it usually turns out to be my fault according to the other person, and my upbringing as a jw is always brought into the light, and also my depressive moods, this person knowing background of my exit from the org.
and the feelings it has caused me.
it feels as though they are using this as a "scapegoat", because even if that person comes home in a bad mood, or has to do something that they don't like, and an argument insues, i automatically am made the "bad guy", even though i was previously in a good mood before things started, and am reminded by this person how i must not be taking my antidepressants, or am thinking too much about my past, etc.
Ditto what Ray says.
The dubs didn't eat me with guilt, and I won't let any partner either. I'd rather be alone.
Good luck.
moscow upholds ban on jehovah's witnesses
by maria danilova.
associated press writer leader of russian jehovah's witnesses, vasily kalin, right, jehovah's witnesses' canadian lawyer john burns, center, and spokesman for the jehovah's witnesses christian presber, stand in front of the moscow city court, wednesday, june 16, 2004. a moscow court upheld a ban on the city's jehovah's witnesses, ending a six-year case that reflected growing pressure to stifle minority religious groups in russia, where orthodox christianity is predominant.
As I suspected, in discussing this with dubya family members, it reconfirms their faith. There have already been verbal reports of witnesses in Moscow being fired from their jobs. I would suggest it's worth looking at other freedoms that have been lost in Russia recently, specifically within the media. If you think this ban is bcause of enlightened thinking by the Russian courts, I would disagree.
On the bright side I was able to compare the treatment of JWs and homosexuals in Russia, much to my family's irritation.
http://www.islamicweb.com/history/chronology.htm
according to a pro-islam website... islam?s history is filled with conquest and violence.
i was intrigued by another posters post about how the crusades were in response to the muslims invading the western world... so i had to do my own research to see if this was actually true.. as it turns out, the muslims have a habit of trying to take over the world.
Hi Avishai
I didn't include you because you hadn't argued for the destruction of Islam. I'm happy to wait for their replies. I don't have a nice neat answer for solving the problem of the Middle East, but dialogue is preferable to nuking.
Hopefully Thi Chi will reply without copying and pasting Richard Csaplar, friend of Pat Robertson.
http://www.islamicweb.com/history/chronology.htm
according to a pro-islam website... islam?s history is filled with conquest and violence.
i was intrigued by another posters post about how the crusades were in response to the muslims invading the western world... so i had to do my own research to see if this was actually true.. as it turns out, the muslims have a habit of trying to take over the world.
Thi chi and Mary
Your lack of comment on Crazy's call for the nuking of the Middle East on religious grounds indicates you agree... could you be accused of item 2 in the posting guidlines? How disappointing.
http://www.islamicweb.com/history/chronology.htm
according to a pro-islam website... islam?s history is filled with conquest and violence.
i was intrigued by another posters post about how the crusades were in response to the muslims invading the western world... so i had to do my own research to see if this was actually true.. as it turns out, the muslims have a habit of trying to take over the world.
Crazy
And what of the opressed 50% of the Muslim population, the women - are they just a necessary sacrifice?
Thi Chi, I'm hoping you don't agree with this guy...
http://www.islamicweb.com/history/chronology.htm
according to a pro-islam website... islam?s history is filled with conquest and violence.
i was intrigued by another posters post about how the crusades were in response to the muslims invading the western world... so i had to do my own research to see if this was actually true.. as it turns out, the muslims have a habit of trying to take over the world.
Thi Chi
I haven't stated that Islam is a delight (nor has Abaddon for that matter) but you're approach to would seem to be to destroy it. Unless, with your comparison to communism, you think it will fail structurally from within. I'm left with the impression that you would be content if all Islamic nations were nuked. Am I wrong and you'd prefer mass conversion to your Christian faith?
Maybe I'm wrong in recalling that you believe in the return of the Messiah, is it by his own means or with the military aid of a Christian army?
edited to add: it was flippant, not smug. I apologise.
http://www.islamicweb.com/history/chronology.htm
according to a pro-islam website... islam?s history is filled with conquest and violence.
i was intrigued by another posters post about how the crusades were in response to the muslims invading the western world... so i had to do my own research to see if this was actually true.. as it turns out, the muslims have a habit of trying to take over the world.
Actually, latest historical research indicates that the Inquisition wasn't as bad as we've been lead to believe. Keep up!
