Just saw an old 538BC thread by AlanF. Jeffro shamelessly copied and pasted it word for word. Just how his interpretations happen to be word for word out of Carl Jonnson's. book.
Posts by Ethos
-
529Analysis of anti-607 BCE Rebuttals
by Ethos ini agreed yesterday to engage in the '607' topic.
i've read numerous threads and am well aware that this topic has been addressed and dissected quite thoroughly.
therefore, if you are uninterested in participating, that's fine.
-
-
-
54
Fact Jews Returned In 538 BC Kills Off Watchtower Chronology
by AlanF inthe watchtower society's 1914 chronology hinges on a dicey chain of claims.
if any of these claims is wrong, then the chain is broken and watchtower chronology collapses.
along with it goes the entire belief structure built on it, including most importantly the claim of the leaders of jehovah's witnesses to have been specially appointed in 1919 by god over "all christ's belongings" on earth.
-
-
Ethos
Oh yeah, AlanF maintained that no website supports 537. In my thread, I even found Bible dictionaries and secular Jewish sites that said 537. OOPS.
-
54
Fact Jews Returned In 538 BC Kills Off Watchtower Chronology
by AlanF inthe watchtower society's 1914 chronology hinges on a dicey chain of claims.
if any of these claims is wrong, then the chain is broken and watchtower chronology collapses.
along with it goes the entire belief structure built on it, including most importantly the claim of the leaders of jehovah's witnesses to have been specially appointed in 1919 by god over "all christ's belongings" on earth.
-
-
Ethos
Yup. Jeffro just regurgitating Carl Jonnson and AlanF. He quoted AlanF almost word for word. Hilarious.
-
13
Curiosity may have made 'historic' discovery on Mars
by wolfman85 inafter reading this news on the link below i wonder, what do you think could have found curiosity on mars?.
http://www.dnaindia.com/scitech/report_curiosity-may-have-made-historic-discovery-on-mars_1767511 .
curiosity may have made 'historic' discovery on mars published: wednesday, nov 21, 2012, 13:54 ist .
-
-
-
13
Curiosity may have made 'historic' discovery on Mars
by wolfman85 inafter reading this news on the link below i wonder, what do you think could have found curiosity on mars?.
http://www.dnaindia.com/scitech/report_curiosity-may-have-made-historic-discovery-on-mars_1767511 .
curiosity may have made 'historic' discovery on mars published: wednesday, nov 21, 2012, 13:54 ist .
-
-
-
529
Analysis of anti-607 BCE Rebuttals
by Ethos ini agreed yesterday to engage in the '607' topic.
i've read numerous threads and am well aware that this topic has been addressed and dissected quite thoroughly.
therefore, if you are uninterested in participating, that's fine.
-
-
Ethos
Who's really looking stupid? The reference to the bible dictionary was for the 70 year exile, NOT 607. Please, someone get Outlaw off the stage. How do you say someone else looks dumb, when you cant even follow the argument.
Now Outlaw please exit stage left. Your routine is stale, your jokes are staler, and this conversation is far too intellectually above your dismal IQ.
-
529
Analysis of anti-607 BCE Rebuttals
by Ethos ini agreed yesterday to engage in the '607' topic.
i've read numerous threads and am well aware that this topic has been addressed and dissected quite thoroughly.
therefore, if you are uninterested in participating, that's fine.
-
-
Ethos
Yeah Ive been getting my ass kicked. And you didnt understand something as basic as a Bible dictionary LOL
So while I'm addressing Jeffro's last post of nonsense maybe they can address this fallacy:
AnnoMaly: Jerusalem was desolated from 609 to 539
2 Chronicles 36:21 "all the days of lying DESOLATED it kept SABBATH."
Jeffro and AnnoMaly: The land kept sabbath for 49 years.
We eagerly await more red herrings, stale humor, and of course more cut and pastes.
-
529
Analysis of anti-607 BCE Rebuttals
by Ethos ini agreed yesterday to engage in the '607' topic.
i've read numerous threads and am well aware that this topic has been addressed and dissected quite thoroughly.
therefore, if you are uninterested in participating, that's fine.
-
-
Ethos
Bible dictionaries SHERLOCK.
You might wanna go look at what the International Standard Bible DICTIONARY said about the sabbaths and the exile.
After reading AnnoMaly and Jeffro's ridiculous argument I'd be trying to find a little humor to detract from their embarrassement as well.
Pterist is reduced to cut and pastes. AnnoMaly and Jeffro are reduced to contradicting their own chronology and their own secular sources. They are reduced to quibbling over when the 70 year exile is said to begin instead of acknowledging many sources INDEED connect the servitude with the 70 year exile regardless of when it started. They've been reduced to ignoring all reliable secular sources that allow for a possible 537 return. It is indeed quite hilarious.
-
529
Analysis of anti-607 BCE Rebuttals
by Ethos ini agreed yesterday to engage in the '607' topic.
i've read numerous threads and am well aware that this topic has been addressed and dissected quite thoroughly.
therefore, if you are uninterested in participating, that's fine.
-
-
Ethos
Ridiculous. Who cares about when they believe the 70 year exile began. The point is they associate the 70 year servitude with the 70 year exile, with the 70 year paying off of sabbaths, which the 70 year desolation of Jerusalem. I've shown that to you from various bible commentaries and translations of 2 Chronicles 36:21. They're all the same and you tenaciously attempt to separate each one of them with ridiculous eisegetical elucidations.
Oh yeah....here's some real humor for you:
AnnoMaly says: "Jerusalem was desolated from 609 to 539" (70 years)
2 Chronicles 36:21 "ALL the days of lying desolated it KEPT SABBATH."
AnnoMaly and Jeffro say the land kept sabbath for only 49 years. This is getting embarassing.
-
529
Analysis of anti-607 BCE Rebuttals
by Ethos ini agreed yesterday to engage in the '607' topic.
i've read numerous threads and am well aware that this topic has been addressed and dissected quite thoroughly.
therefore, if you are uninterested in participating, that's fine.
-
-
Ethos
I've been bored. You say I havent brought forth any evidence but the only basis you have for 538 is Josephus writings and pure speculation. No matter what secular source I put forth you want to try to discredit on the silliest of claims because you dont want to accept that there is basis for the JW interpretation. Even the early Church Fathers believed there was a 70 year exile and Jeffro has unwittingly taken the bait and shown himself to be nothing more than a picky quoter, who only wants to use secular sourcrs when it fits his conjured chronology. Its really you and Jeffro who are not good at this.Scholar after scholar, historian after historian, dictionary after dictionary, they have all shown that it was believed to be a 70 year exile.
Denial is a really unhealthy thing.