The (k)GB already knew this was going to happen, which is why in the July broadcast Lett said it was all apostate driven lies. It was said preemptively to attack the integrity of the royal commission hearing. I hope they use Lett's soundbite in the hearings next week.
Sure they knew this was happening. I am not convinced they had any idea the Commission would make all the witnesses so far look like such a bunch of utterly clueless and spineless chumps.
The real kicker is that not that much materially has changed. Sure the turd has been polished over the years but there is a hell of a lot that remains:
- accused facing the accuser
- male only questionings with no supporter or advocate for the victim
- two witnesses before any JC action can be taken
- no positive, pro-active support for, let alone unilateral mandatory, reporting
- possibility of abusers being appointed to positions of privilege possibility of an abuser being in a congregation with no or limited knowledge by members of the congregation
- possibility of a victim being, even unintentionally, influenced not to go to the authorities or being concerned about slander should they speak out
- elders being unable to act on conscience but rather having to defer to Bethel at all stages
So much of what contributed to piss poor handling of cases 20, 30, 40 years ago has not really changed. The usual course of action would be to ride it out but I have a suspicion that there will be some people giving the GB advice to the effect of doing some things voluntarily asap rather than having it forced on them.
The GB does not need precedents for legal action and costly payouts but it also needs to nip this in the bud and prevent other countries grabbing them by the balls. Too much of this and the next question to be asked will be about tax status, charitable status and community good.
In the meantime I bet they are moving funds around legal entities like there's no tomorrow in an effort to plead poverty just in case the litigation balloon goes up.