disposable hero of hypocrisy - Sorry for the big paste, but this is from Wikipedia...
disposable - Thanks for the Wiki link. I would imagine it is a safe bet that none of these organizations would have policies that come anywhere near the JW's in relation to the handling of child molestation within their group, let alone the "two witness" rule.
cofty - What is an "atheist organisation"?
cofty - The OP was something that I was asked recently. My guess was that an "atheist organisation" would have at least be registered under a law as a legal entity and at the least have an Articles of Association.
ruby456 - thanks for the UN cover up link. I have just gone through the Wikileaks documents.
CalebInFloroda - children generally do not join atheist organizations
CalebInFloroda - good point.
nicolaou - I myself have found the question challenging the more I go into it which is why I included by "atheist" and "irreligious" in the title and op. Of course child abuse would not stop if there was no religion but the vast majority occurs within religion, with the abuser claiming religious affiliation. All points aside, it's not the abuser that was the subject but rather the propensity of the organization to cover up.