vienne,
I read the first volume of Russell's studies years ago. I think in order for a teaching to be scriptural, it has to be expressed in scripture. It seems to me we have verses that support universalism as an outcome, whereas second chance theology is argued from verses that speak of universal resurrection and judgment, the verses used to argue universalism is also used but interpreted to mean a temporary version, God's prophetic blessings especially to israel and then a strong appeal to freewill belief and "it would be unfair if". Anyway thanks for the link to the Storr's writing, I will look through it .