i have two honest questions for everyone here.
i understand that most here want retribution from the courts against watchtower for child abuse allegations.
but let us take away the instances where someone was accused of child abuse and then later put back into a position of authority, such as an elder or an ms. let us just take the cases where a regular publisher or even an appointed person, with no previous accusation of child abuse has come up against that person.
You're calling me a strawman so like I asked. Please point out a factual thing that I have said that is wrong. Not a spelling or a grammar issue, a factual statement that I made that is wrong. And please present your argument with facts and not your opinion or supposition.....RO
No..I have not called you a strawman..
I said you present Strawman Arguments..
Obviously you still don`t know what that means..
Please point out a factual thing that I have said that is wrong.
Read my comment above..
i have two honest questions for everyone here.
i understand that most here want retribution from the courts against watchtower for child abuse allegations.
but let us take away the instances where someone was accused of child abuse and then later put back into a position of authority, such as an elder or an ms. let us just take the cases where a regular publisher or even an appointed person, with no previous accusation of child abuse has come up against that person.
Outlaw. I am sorry that I misspelled toe to toe.....RO
Don`t be sorry..Get spell check..Grammarly is good too..
Plus..
Learn to use an online dictionary so you understand what words mean..
i have two honest questions for everyone here.
i understand that most here want retribution from the courts against watchtower for child abuse allegations.
but let us take away the instances where someone was accused of child abuse and then later put back into a position of authority, such as an elder or an ms. let us just take the cases where a regular publisher or even an appointed person, with no previous accusation of child abuse has come up against that person.
I am not an apologist.....RO
Yes you are..
I am very educated.
No your not..
just because you go straight to emotion for your argument
That never happened......Another Stawman Argument..
You want to go tow to tow on intelligence on this matter, I will take you on.
You`ve already lost on the intelligence part....It`s "Toe to Toe"..
Tow means to pull something..
Just out of curiosity,what are you planning to pull?
I will go up against you any time you want.
You`re beating yourself up pretty good,without my help.....LOL!!..
i have two honest questions for everyone here.
i understand that most here want retribution from the courts against watchtower for child abuse allegations.
but let us take away the instances where someone was accused of child abuse and then later put back into a position of authority, such as an elder or an ms. let us just take the cases where a regular publisher or even an appointed person, with no previous accusation of child abuse has come up against that person.
Just because you don't agree with me doesn't mean that I am a straw man.
Just because I don't cow-tow to some of you who feel that Watchtower and/or all religion should be sacked that I am a straw man.....RO
You`re not a Strawman
You`re an ill-educated Watchtower/JW Apologist,presenting Strawman Arguments..
And..
You`re not smart enough to understand what a Strawman Argument is,even though I cut and pasted the definition for you..
Your "WatchTower Education" is showing..
i have two honest questions for everyone here.
i understand that most here want retribution from the courts against watchtower for child abuse allegations.
but let us take away the instances where someone was accused of child abuse and then later put back into a position of authority, such as an elder or an ms. let us just take the cases where a regular publisher or even an appointed person, with no previous accusation of child abuse has come up against that person.
Let's say that someone in Austria,
So let's say I am the parent
Now lets say that the elders tell everyone.....RO
A strawman argument.
From Wikipedia
A straw man is a common form of argument and is an informal fallacy based on giving the impression of refuting an opponent's argument, while actually refuting an argument that was not advanced by that opponent.[1] One who engages in this fallacy is said to be "attacking a straw man".
The typical straw man argument creates the illusion of having completely refuted or defeated an opponent's proposition through the covert replacement of it with a different proposition (i.e. "stand up a straw man") and the subsequent refutation of that false argument ("knock down a straw man") instead of the opponent's actual proposition.[2][3]
i have two honest questions for everyone here.
i understand that most here want retribution from the courts against watchtower for child abuse allegations.
but let us take away the instances where someone was accused of child abuse and then later put back into a position of authority, such as an elder or an ms. let us just take the cases where a regular publisher or even an appointed person, with no previous accusation of child abuse has come up against that person.
I don't agree with the idea that Watchtower should be sued to oblivion.....RO
That pretty much sums up the purpose of this thread..
Don`t hold the WatchTower accountable for any Crimes they Commit..
..........................
Good thread..
It shows the lengths the Watchtower and JW`s will go to to protect JW Pedophiles..
No wonder the WBT$/JW`s are called a Pedophiles Paradise..
i have two honest questions for everyone here.
i understand that most here want retribution from the courts against watchtower for child abuse allegations.
but let us take away the instances where someone was accused of child abuse and then later put back into a position of authority, such as an elder or an ms. let us just take the cases where a regular publisher or even an appointed person, with no previous accusation of child abuse has come up against that person.
I am honestly trying to understand better.
No..
You`re defending an obscure WBT$/JW Cult Organization you pretend not to know much about..
Do you really think you're the first JW who most likely won`t admit they`re a JW, to write a thread like this?..
The good thing about threads like this is..
Readers can see just how Corrupt & Criminal the Watchtower and it`s followers are..
.
what do you think about using pre-teens to work religious propaganda phonebank?.
Am I the only one who feels nauseated at the sight of the chairs and microphones?? ( Shudder......😦).....DD
It brings back nightmares..
JW adults have no idea what they`re talking about,up on that stage..
As a JW Kid..I was lost trying to explain that shit..
All I could do was parrot the script that had been written for me..
It`s all a farce..
i have two honest questions for everyone here.
i understand that most here want retribution from the courts against watchtower for child abuse allegations.
but let us take away the instances where someone was accused of child abuse and then later put back into a position of authority, such as an elder or an ms. let us just take the cases where a regular publisher or even an appointed person, with no previous accusation of child abuse has come up against that person.
Why do you feel that Watchtower is responsible for that person's actions against the
child?
what do you want Watchtower to do in countries that either have a low age of consent or have a very lax or non-existent law enforcement and judicial branch.
during the watchtower study today, i browsed genesis and looked for evidence of noah ever preaching to anyone.
from what i could glean from the scriptures, it was a foregone conclusion that noah's family would be it on the ark.
(unless they towed some rafts behind) my wife says that building the ark could be considered a witness of his faith to the wicked world, but that seems kind of lame to me.. so, should i just assume that god decided not to give anyone else a chance for redemption?
