Fraz,
I never said "all humans are equally vulnerable to cults". I recognize every dimension of personality as being variable by degrees.
Especially in the area of the softer sciences - psychology, economics, sociology, anthropology you will see professors, therapists etc. peddling some serious woo. And I don't mean "working hypothesis". I mean they have a solid belief in methods that are really unproven. Just start a critical discussion about Carl Jung and you will get a pretty good gauge of how smart people can be vulnerable. Even the renowned scientist Wolfgang Pauli got sucked into Jung's vortex. Alcoholic geniuses will believe in God so they can get cured of their habit through Alcoholics Anonymous. Look up Rupert Sheldrake and his morphogenic fields theory. Do you ever watch how often Wayne Dyer gets a chance to sell his crap on educational television?
I admit that when I was younger I read Dianetics (early 1970's) and rejected it. I toyed with biorhythms for a couple months. Transcendental Meditation has never done anything for me - probably because I am already too transcendental! I even became addicted to Skinnerian behaviorism and read all of skinners books and his autobiography. None of these ideas have been robust enough to hold me. But there are millions of people who are highly educated but fall under the spell of a charismatic lecturer. Watch a few Ted lectures if you aren't convinced. If that isn't enough walk into your local Apple "Genius" bar and observe these people who are willing to pay the estate of Steve Jobs for the privilege of belonging to the church of "stolen innovation".
All humans are not equally vulnerable to cults but education doesn't seem to be a panacea. And why should we even want people to NOT be vulnerable to cults. What people become interested in is associated with their need for novelty. And out of novelty comes discovery. So maybe we have to put up with all the dead ends of novelty to get a better understanding of our universe. Neil Degrasse Tyson gives an excellent lecture addressing the belief that education makes the difference. Look it up on YouTube it's called "The Perimeter of Ignorance". Basically he points out that of the top scientists of the academy 15% profess a belief in God compared to 90% of the public. He asks why isn't it 0% of the top scientists.
So, your critique of my "working hypothesis" is mostly an emotional reaction. Senator Proxmire of Wisconsin used to hand out the Golden Fleece award to what he considered the most ridiculous research the government funded. One year it involved studying the sexual behavior of cock-roaches. Ha Ha Ha!. But if you want to control an infestation of cock-roaches don't you think it might be helpful to understand something about their sex life? So what's so objectionable about exploring religious books for some kind of evidence of alien communication. Do you believe that there is a greater or lesser likelihood that there are other more advanced civilizations in this universe? Or do you think that humans are the unique creation of an all-knowing, all-powerful god everlasting God? To be creative you need to have a capacity to withstand ridicule. Being able to withstand ridicule is not going to guarantee the production of some great idea but without that ability it is likely you will never have a great idea.
The way most people react to the Bible when they become informed enough to understand that there is no god is to discard the Bible. This is naturalistic thinking not creative-possibility thinking. Dismissing God doesn't eliminate the possibility of other sentient beings that might have an interest in human success on earth. And just because there has been no voice from heaven or on a worldwide TV hook-up doesn't limit the possibility. And just because there is the possibility that the Bible contains messages from an advanced civilization doesn't mean everyone is obligated to investigate that possibility. There are an infinite number of areas that scientists could investigate that an individual might not be interested. It doesn't rock everyone's boat. My personal obsession is without a doubt prompted by being raised a JW.
What if Israel and Palestinians don't reach an accord? There is nothing in the Bible that says they will. I have merely presented it as a possible candidate for the type of peace agreement that could be considered a major accomplishment if it actually happened. Is it likely that it will happen? Judging by news events it doesn't seem possible. But it has gotten the worlds attention. It has been a festering problem to most of the civilized world because it spawns terrorism and wastes resources in wars and weapons. It is such a tiny area but the effect is to justify tyrants who have kept over a billion people in the Mideast from joining the modern world. Even though Americans don't care much about this it is worth paying attention to even if you don't feel it has any prophetic meaning.
If it doesn't happen it is simply the null hypothesis. That is the difference between a scientific investigation and religious dogma.