Puts an entirely different spin on things, doesn't it?
It does. Where the heck did they learn blacksmithing skills and mine the metal for a till and learn animal husbandry?
EntirelyPossible
JoinedPosts by EntirelyPossible
-
-
-
-
149
Exactly how many different views of Jesus are there on the Board and doesn't that kind of tell Believers the obvious problem...
by designs in -
-
EntirelyPossible
He should be a metalhead golfer, tammy.
-
136
Life after death
by truthseeker ineveryone has different views about life after death and whether or not it is a possibility.. as jehovah's witnesses, we were always taught that there is no life after death, that this is the only life we have now and that the wages of sin is death.. .
what are your views on life after death?.
.
-
-
EntirelyPossible
EP not ALL scientists are evolutionists. Many are creationists or at least doubt that evolution is feasable.
Of course not. Many are cosmologists, geologists, chemists, etc. Of course, the term "many" is misleading and hard to quantify. In 2009, a Pew Research Center Poll found that 87% of scientists in ALL fields of science believe in evolution. From other studies, when narrowed down to scientists related to biology and life sciences, the gap closes to 0.5% of scientists doubting or disbeleiving evolution.
So exactly how many is "many"? How relevant is their training? What field do they work in? Is their work peer reviewed? Is it testable, repeatable?
Your list is indeed inpressive in how utterly useless it is. The most RECENT scientist you list DIED almost 100 years ago. I am sure none of them believed in quantum mechanics or the internet or black holes or nuclear weapons either, but since those scientifict advances came before their time, it's not at all relevant.
And, finally, with regard to the plance ticket, I could buy or use some of the hundreds of thousands of airline points I have, but, presuming I did that and you could somehow introduce me to Hugh Laurie, you still would only be proving that Hugh Laurie is real, at best, not that House isn't real.
Can you prove a negative?
-
149
Exactly how many different views of Jesus are there on the Board and doesn't that kind of tell Believers the obvious problem...
by designs in -
-
EntirelyPossible
No, the authenticity and inspiration was not settled. Even if the books, error riddled as they are, were inspired, with all the different versions floating around out there, how do you know if you have the inspired version or the "not quite, try again" version? And the OT "canon" was not canon until it was made so at the same time as the NT.
You really don't know anything about this, do you?
-
149
Exactly how many different views of Jesus are there on the Board and doesn't that kind of tell Believers the obvious problem...
by designs in -
-
EntirelyPossible
Apocrypha is spurious, not canonical.
Neither was the canon until around 400 years AFTER Jesus someone decided they needed a canon.
-
20
May 21st, 2011, Judgement Day?
by FrankWTower inwhile on the subject of some wacko making yet another prediction, i found this info on time.com.. .
the onset of world war i freaked a lot of people out.
but it was especially trippy for the zion's watch tower tract society, a group that's now called jehovah's witnesses.
-
-
EntirelyPossible
So, OBVES, it's the 21st and all is well. On to your backup date?
-
136
Life after death
by truthseeker ineveryone has different views about life after death and whether or not it is a possibility.. as jehovah's witnesses, we were always taught that there is no life after death, that this is the only life we have now and that the wages of sin is death.. .
what are your views on life after death?.
.
-
-
EntirelyPossible
Evolutionists are the ones who have a problem with people not believing their silly theory.
You would have a serious problem with it if you were cut off from the advances in medicine and healthcare that come from evolution. And by problem, I mean "death".
Short of buying a plane ticket and taking you to meet him personally.
So you are giving up and admitting you CAN't prove that House isn't real?
I answered your question a lot more than you answered mine.
I never claimed I couldn't prove that Jesus didn't live. To do so would be a logical impossibility. Why would I accept a a challenge that is impossible? Besides which, YOU claimed you could do something, not me.
Yeah Nick....thought I'd say it before you did.....thats generally how evolutionsts talk about people who don't agree with them. Said it in a language you would understand
It's generally how people that get science talk about people that refuse to believe, accept or make any attempt at understanding science all while denying it yet at the same time reaping the benefits of it.
-
149
Exactly how many different views of Jesus are there on the Board and doesn't that kind of tell Believers the obvious problem...
by designs in -
-
EntirelyPossible
Paragraphs, Shelby. Paragraphs :)
-
149
Exactly how many different views of Jesus are there on the Board and doesn't that kind of tell Believers the obvious problem...
by designs in -
-
EntirelyPossible
Oh, what a dear you are
It seemed more age appropriate that their other awesome song (out of many) called "Stoned and Drunk". And yes, I knew that song off the top of my head. I've seem black label in concert twice and have all of their albumns. How it seemed more age appropriate... I have no idea, but stoned and drunk seemed like the wrong message to send to kids.
They could always listen to Tom Waits, "Jesus Gonna Be Here"
I just saw motorhead and missed sepultura because I was out of town.
-
149
Exactly how many different views of Jesus are there on the Board and doesn't that kind of tell Believers the obvious problem...
by designs in -
-
EntirelyPossible
As for 43 seconds in, I don't handle abuse well either :)
Yes you do.
Wait, did you want the five minute argument or the full half hour?