i know there was a leak a few weeks back, but this really does seem to have come out of the blue.. the anomaly was the original decision.
it clearly had no basis in law or the constitution, and was a flimsy, ridiculous ruling.
plus the whole thing was based on a fraudulent case in the first place.. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-61928898.
I couldn't help but laugh. It confirms that it's not really about the edge cases - you know, rape, incest, forced prostitution, medical reasons - this is about using abortion as contraceptive.
And to that - the response has always been : well, you could be responsible and not fuck around so much. Roe is overturned and just like that women start to think about consequences again. Hmmmmmmmmm.
i know there was a leak a few weeks back, but this really does seem to have come out of the blue.. the anomaly was the original decision.
it clearly had no basis in law or the constitution, and was a flimsy, ridiculous ruling.
plus the whole thing was based on a fraudulent case in the first place.. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-61928898.
Don't know if this is really gaining traction... but LOL!
i know there was a leak a few weeks back, but this really does seem to have come out of the blue.. the anomaly was the original decision.
it clearly had no basis in law or the constitution, and was a flimsy, ridiculous ruling.
plus the whole thing was based on a fraudulent case in the first place.. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-61928898.
From Twitter:
Notice the framing. They keep saying it's not about life, it's about control. And of course Stpehen King hyperbolically welcomes everyone to the Handmaid's tale. The disconnect is incredible.
i know there was a leak a few weeks back, but this really does seem to have come out of the blue.. the anomaly was the original decision.
it clearly had no basis in law or the constitution, and was a flimsy, ridiculous ruling.
plus the whole thing was based on a fraudulent case in the first place.. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-61928898.
Woe. I had no idea the meltdown on Twitter was so intense. Blue checkmarks are losing their minds - but it's all the same talking point...
They really don't get the legal issue or the moral one.
i know there was a leak a few weeks back, but this really does seem to have come out of the blue.. the anomaly was the original decision.
it clearly had no basis in law or the constitution, and was a flimsy, ridiculous ruling.
plus the whole thing was based on a fraudulent case in the first place.. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-61928898.
I can't wait until the riots start. Ironically, but not surprisingly, since the issue fell back to the states, and since most blue states will keep it legal, and since most rioters live in blue states, the left will burn down their own towns and cities in protest.
The real special ones will then look around and marvel at the institutional racism keeping them poor.
i know there was a leak a few weeks back, but this really does seem to have come out of the blue.. the anomaly was the original decision.
it clearly had no basis in law or the constitution, and was a flimsy, ridiculous ruling.
plus the whole thing was based on a fraudulent case in the first place.. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-61928898.
Democrats haven't been this angry since the republicans freed their slaves!
Ouch.
original reddit post (removed).
Aw, looks like I missed the action.
i saw a statistic the other day that something like 25% of all the debt that the us has incurred since 1776 was created in the last 12 months.
that's because they have printed so much currency and instead of letting that stop them, they are going to continue printing more to go on a spending spree on crazy green-new-deal schemes and union handouts.. does anyone think that this can be anything other than inflationary?
they are effectively stealing the wealth of everyone to then hand money out to people.
Also, the train is on fire.
They would need to raise interest rates above the inflation rate to get ahead of it. The 8.6% is understated. Do you think a hike to 10/15/20% is possible? No. If the interest rate were raised to 10%, the US couldn't service its debt (by taking out new debt). So it would mean default, and the start of the "Greater Than the Great Depression". Of course that wouldn't be allowed to happen, so they would start minting those trillion dollar coins... and that would mark the beginning of the "Greater than the Greater than the Great Depression".
i saw a statistic the other day that something like 25% of all the debt that the us has incurred since 1776 was created in the last 12 months.
that's because they have printed so much currency and instead of letting that stop them, they are going to continue printing more to go on a spending spree on crazy green-new-deal schemes and union handouts.. does anyone think that this can be anything other than inflationary?
they are effectively stealing the wealth of everyone to then hand money out to people.
hearings are on the schedule for abc, bbc, cbs, cnn, msnbc and nbc.
not on fox "news".. will you be watching?
or maybe .
