i have not meet all atheists, and it would be foolish for me to assume that all atheists, share the same prototypical view points.
i am inclined to feel that this classifies the views of a large percentage of atheists.
"atheism is, in a broad sense, the rejection of belief in the existence of deities.
Do you think that dogs, foetuses, corpses and plants are agnostic?
IMO you need to be able to know, to not know. So no.
They are atheists in the sense that they all are without belief in God.
The atheist community rapidly grew
I guess, if you believe rocks and the earth are Atheists. Babies would be on the list to :P
i have not meet all atheists, and it would be foolish for me to assume that all atheists, share the same prototypical view points.
i am inclined to feel that this classifies the views of a large percentage of atheists.
"atheism is, in a broad sense, the rejection of belief in the existence of deities.
I am not sure if babies can "know", if they can't. they would not be considered Agnostics either.
I think they might but I am not sure.
i have not meet all atheists, and it would be foolish for me to assume that all atheists, share the same prototypical view points.
i am inclined to feel that this classifies the views of a large percentage of atheists.
"atheism is, in a broad sense, the rejection of belief in the existence of deities.
By the way, you can conclude something doesn't exist based on lack of evidence usingmodus tollens.
Thank you, interesting!
Am I understanding correctly that the premises have to be true for it to be logical reasoning? And considered usingmodus tollens?
i have not meet all atheists, and it would be foolish for me to assume that all atheists, share the same prototypical view points.
i am inclined to feel that this classifies the views of a large percentage of atheists.
"atheism is, in a broad sense, the rejection of belief in the existence of deities.
lacking belief in them even before you heard of it
Like not being able to comprehend the idea? Like a baby?
Do you also think that dogs are atheists, fetuses and corpses? What about plants?
i have not meet all atheists, and it would be foolish for me to assume that all atheists, share the same prototypical view points.
i am inclined to feel that this classifies the views of a large percentage of atheists.
"atheism is, in a broad sense, the rejection of belief in the existence of deities.
i have not meet all atheists, and it would be foolish for me to assume that all atheists, share the same prototypical view points.
i am inclined to feel that this classifies the views of a large percentage of atheists.
"atheism is, in a broad sense, the rejection of belief in the existence of deities.
And as babies aren't born with a ready-made belief in god, they're not theists/deists.
I guess that just leaves atheism!
No, I still affirm that to lack belief in something you need to know what that something is..
i have not meet all atheists, and it would be foolish for me to assume that all atheists, share the same prototypical view points.
i am inclined to feel that this classifies the views of a large percentage of atheists.
"atheism is, in a broad sense, the rejection of belief in the existence of deities.
Agnosticism means you are thinking about what you know. Babies don't do that. All they know is that the big thing has bags of food they like to suck on.
No, it means that you don't know/are not certain. If 100% is certainty than 0% "I don't know". Since baby's don't know, they are Agnostic.
i have not meet all atheists, and it would be foolish for me to assume that all atheists, share the same prototypical view points.
i am inclined to feel that this classifies the views of a large percentage of atheists.
"atheism is, in a broad sense, the rejection of belief in the existence of deities.
Getting people to understand basic logic, science and critical thinking takes a lot of pages.
Cocky aren't we?
i have not meet all atheists, and it would be foolish for me to assume that all atheists, share the same prototypical view points.
i am inclined to feel that this classifies the views of a large percentage of atheists.
"atheism is, in a broad sense, the rejection of belief in the existence of deities.
It was 1948 predicted mathematically in 1948, actually, so there was evidence for BEFORE it was detectable. You're also assuming that, when I said "undectable" I mean "with out current tools". I did not. I simply said "undetectable". If there is no way to detect God, ever, in any sense, then it can in no conceivable way interact with the universe.
I just showed you a way science dealt with fairies. What else are you after?
I never said you should. Why do ask questions about things I never wrote?
meaning lacking belief in them even before you heard of it, babies are similarly atheists.
I am simply pointing out that, in much the same way you are a-magical unicorn in my dog's butt, meaning lacking belief in them even before you heard of it, babies are similarly atheists.
No i did not have neither
i have not meet all atheists, and it would be foolish for me to assume that all atheists, share the same prototypical view points.
i am inclined to feel that this classifies the views of a large percentage of atheists.
"atheism is, in a broad sense, the rejection of belief in the existence of deities.
Before you were aware of the magical unicorns made of meteorite teapots living in my dog's butt, did you have or lack a belief in them?
No i did not have neither, as said before; I don't think I can believe that unless I am first made aware of the idea.
Why do you think I should?
