bohm

Joined

• started 191 topics
• posted 7,847 times   see topics posted on
• send a message

Posts by bohm

• 
  280

  the flood, mammoths, elphants, and food.

  by Crazyguy in

  1. watchtower
  2. bible

  my question is since it looks as though mammoths were alive after the flood and we know elephants are then how much food was needed to feed just these four animals for the time they were on the ark.

  also was the ark, 500 feet long, big enough to hold the amount of food needed for just these 4 animals.. .

  .

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  bohm

  Cades: this textbook discuss the shell therem and say the gravitational field is zero At p 24.

  http://books.google.dk/books?id=BGYcivB1EtMC&printsec=frontcover#v=onepage&q&f=false

  you can find a discussionon the difference with newtons and laplaces interpretation in most book on the history of science, iirc it is in b russels history of western phil. Great stuff.

  Re. The terminal velocity, by the argument a few pages ago the magnitude of the acceleration fall linear By the shell theorem. Since we know the boundary conditions, 0 and g, the force F at r must scale as

  F = -g r/R where R is the radius of earth. This is just hookes law so the properties follow from there.

  the velociry at center is about 8000 m per s according to my pen an pencil addled computation. Sorry ipad version.
• 
  280

  the flood, mammoths, elphants, and food.

  by Crazyguy in

  1. watchtower
  2. bible

  my question is since it looks as though mammoths were alive after the flood and we know elephants are then how much food was needed to feed just these four animals for the time they were on the ark.

  also was the ark, 500 feet long, big enough to hold the amount of food needed for just these 4 animals.. .

  .

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  bohm

  Sir82: sexy but pointless and frustrating It seems. perhaps the comment about youporn was more salient than i first thought lol.
• 
  280

  the flood, mammoths, elphants, and food.

  by Crazyguy in

  1. watchtower
  2. bible

  my question is since it looks as though mammoths were alive after the flood and we know elephants are then how much food was needed to feed just these four animals for the time they were on the ark.

  also was the ark, 500 feet long, big enough to hold the amount of food needed for just these 4 animals.. .

  .

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  bohm

  Viv, i acknowledge that is your oppinion. Meanwhile i think i have said the same thing for three pages. We disagree and you think i should watch porn. Lol
• 
  280

  the flood, mammoths, elphants, and food.

  by Crazyguy in

  1. watchtower
  2. bible

  my question is since it looks as though mammoths were alive after the flood and we know elephants are then how much food was needed to feed just these four animals for the time they were on the ark.

  also was the ark, 500 feet long, big enough to hold the amount of food needed for just these 4 animals.. .

  .

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  bohm

  Viv: Visit youporn or something. ... I've instilled in them a respect for the elder generation

  i am sure you have. Do you tell them to visit youporn too when they disrespect you? Lol
• 
  280

  the flood, mammoths, elphants, and food.

  by Crazyguy in

  1. watchtower
  2. bible

  my question is since it looks as though mammoths were alive after the flood and we know elephants are then how much food was needed to feed just these four animals for the time they were on the ark.

  also was the ark, 500 feet long, big enough to hold the amount of food needed for just these 4 animals.. .

  .

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  bohm

  Viv, i send you a pm at a time where i thought we were talking about physics. you send me a pm last and i did not reply. Notice i dont misstate what was in it.

  I dont know if i agree with you or not by now because i dont know what you believe and dont care to find out anymore.

  You are free not to trust me on physics or in any other matter.

  if you mentor the kids the same way you are involved in this thread i feel very bad for them.
• 
  280

  the flood, mammoths, elphants, and food.

  by Crazyguy in

  1. watchtower
  2. bible

  my question is since it looks as though mammoths were alive after the flood and we know elephants are then how much food was needed to feed just these four animals for the time they were on the ark.

  also was the ark, 500 feet long, big enough to hold the amount of food needed for just these 4 animals.. .

  .

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  bohm

  I agree that is what you believe. Please do not send me more pms, dont post my pms and dont try to summarise them. I realise i cannot have a conversation with you and i regret not noticing this a few pages ago. Feel free to say you "won" or that i am giving up.

  i will still try to clear up misunderstanding on the physics and if there are some reading this thread who can tell me what your point was i would be happy to hear it, i really would.
• 
  280

  the flood, mammoths, elphants, and food.

  by Crazyguy in

  1. watchtower
  2. bible

  my question is since it looks as though mammoths were alive after the flood and we know elephants are then how much food was needed to feed just these four animals for the time they were on the ark.

  also was the ark, 500 feet long, big enough to hold the amount of food needed for just these 4 animals.. .

  .

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  bohm

  Viv, i really dont think you can tell the difference between what you want people to have said and what they say.
• 
  280

  the flood, mammoths, elphants, and food.

  by Crazyguy in

  1. watchtower
  2. bible

  my question is since it looks as though mammoths were alive after the flood and we know elephants are then how much food was needed to feed just these four animals for the time they were on the ark.

  also was the ark, 500 feet long, big enough to hold the amount of food needed for just these 4 animals.. .

  .

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  bohm

  Viv, i am happy to observe you do not violate the posting guidelines by posting pms, however i wish you had not done so by continuing to misrepresent and make things up. You are free to believe you are right and i am wrong and i agree this conversation properly wont change your mind. Happy weekend.
• 
  280

  the flood, mammoths, elphants, and food.

  by Crazyguy in

  1. watchtower
  2. bible

  my question is since it looks as though mammoths were alive after the flood and we know elephants are then how much food was needed to feed just these four animals for the time they were on the ark.

  also was the ark, 500 feet long, big enough to hold the amount of food needed for just these 4 animals.. .

  .

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  bohm

  Caedes: I do not insist you are wrong under all definitions of the word "gravity", but I think you are wrong under the simplest. It is at any rate completely accurate to say there is no gravitational field inside the sphere (it is zero).
• 
  280

  the flood, mammoths, elphants, and food.

  by Crazyguy in

  1. watchtower
  2. bible

  my question is since it looks as though mammoths were alive after the flood and we know elephants are then how much food was needed to feed just these four animals for the time they were on the ark.

  also was the ark, 500 feet long, big enough to hold the amount of food needed for just these 4 animals.. .

  .

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  bohm

  Caedes: No, you are correct to say there are two forces on the ping-pong ball. However when we are talking about the gravitational field we have to keep in mind what the gravitational field IS.

  To compare to the ping-poing ball, the "field" would be an "effective field" composed of the force of air and gravity. That field would be zero at the ball, hence no field.