Americans need to stop buying things.
Don't tell me only Dems want to control the masses' private lives.
Actually, I quite agree on the savings part.
the prescient stock broker, and austrian school econ guru that called this current economics crisis well ahead of time.
i remember him in 2004/2005 like a voice in the wilderness.. http://www.newhavenindependent.org/archives/2009/02/netroots_promot.php#013623.
web-savvy libertarians in california have launched a nationwide movement to draft a new haven-born celebrity pundit to take on connecticut u.s. sen. chris dodd.
Americans need to stop buying things.
Don't tell me only Dems want to control the masses' private lives.
Actually, I quite agree on the savings part.
an atheist friend (never a jw) sent me a link to this fun test:.
http://www.beliefnet.com/entertainment/quizzes/beliefomatic.aspx.
turns out i am 100% secular humanist, but unfortunately i am still 5% jw!.
1. | Secular Humanism(100%) |
2. | Unitarian Universalism(92%) |
3. | Nontheist(75%) |
4. | Liberal Quakers(74%) |
5. | Theravada Buddhism(72%) |
6. | Neo-Pagan(63%) |
7. | Mainline to Liberal Christian Protestants(57%) |
8. | New Age(46%) |
9. | Taoism(45%) |
10. | Orthodox Quaker(38%) |
11. | Reform Judaism(38%) |
12. | Mahayana Buddhism(37%) |
13. | Baha'i Faith(27%) |
14. | Sikhism(27%) |
15. | Scientology(26%) |
16. | Jainism(26%) |
17. | New Thought(24%) |
18. | Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints (Mormons)(22%) |
19. | Christian Science (Church of Christ, Scientist)(19%) |
20. | Seventh Day Adventist(17%) |
21. | Hinduism(16%) |
22. | Mainline to Conservative Christian/Protestant(16%) |
23. | Eastern Orthodox(14%) |
24. | Islam(14%) |
25. | Orthodox Judaism(14%) |
26. | Roman Catholic(14%) |
27. | Jehovah's Witness(11%) |
with the latest surge of anti-european comments and threads from us anti-progressives on this board, a little bit american self-criticism may be appropriate.. since the eighties, income inequality has been on the rise in american society.
most economists, however, agree that redistributing wealth is a legitimate role for any modern enlightened government.
and even alan greenspan labelled us income inequality a "disturbing tend" which could lead to societal instability.
the riddle is easily misinterpreted.
I notice you haven't elaborated on your riddle.
just google alfie patten and you'll get the story.. sylvia.
Nice opportunity to pimp my own thread on this subject
http://www.jehovahs-witness.net/social/current/171645/1/UKs-future
with the latest surge of anti-european comments and threads from us anti-progressives on this board, a little bit american self-criticism may be appropriate.. since the eighties, income inequality has been on the rise in american society.
most economists, however, agree that redistributing wealth is a legitimate role for any modern enlightened government.
and even alan greenspan labelled us income inequality a "disturbing tend" which could lead to societal instability.
Insofar as 'all men being created equal', this is a nice dream, thought, or fantasy
So the ideas behind your constitution are just a few loose words, a dream, no reality?
with the latest surge of anti-european comments and threads from us anti-progressives on this board, a little bit american self-criticism may be appropriate.. since the eighties, income inequality has been on the rise in american society.
most economists, however, agree that redistributing wealth is a legitimate role for any modern enlightened government.
and even alan greenspan labelled us income inequality a "disturbing tend" which could lead to societal instability.
Christians tend to bestow moral authority on their spiritual leaders. That's no real liberation to me.
with the latest surge of anti-european comments and threads from us anti-progressives on this board, a little bit american self-criticism may be appropriate.. since the eighties, income inequality has been on the rise in american society.
most economists, however, agree that redistributing wealth is a legitimate role for any modern enlightened government.
and even alan greenspan labelled us income inequality a "disturbing tend" which could lead to societal instability.
America was founded on the tacit principle that only the landed gentry should govern or have a say in how government is administered.
We the People of the United States ... promote the general Welfare.
I don't believe a concentration of power and wealth in a political or economic elite class is the underpinning of all things American. The US Constitution was way more progressive.
with the latest surge of anti-european comments and threads from us anti-progressives on this board, a little bit american self-criticism may be appropriate.. since the eighties, income inequality has been on the rise in american society.
most economists, however, agree that redistributing wealth is a legitimate role for any modern enlightened government.
and even alan greenspan labelled us income inequality a "disturbing tend" which could lead to societal instability.
its made up of people in the community.
That's how it should be and that's why governments all over Europe are trembling as angry people take to the streets demanding social policies and a sustainable economy.
with the latest surge of anti-european comments and threads from us anti-progressives on this board, a little bit american self-criticism may be appropriate.. since the eighties, income inequality has been on the rise in american society.
most economists, however, agree that redistributing wealth is a legitimate role for any modern enlightened government.
and even alan greenspan labelled us income inequality a "disturbing tend" which could lead to societal instability.
Sorry Im so unprogressive.
No problem Ippy. Indeed, a redistributive state is more progressive than a status quo state, that's obvious. A libertarian 'leave me alone' attitude embraces the 'more of the same' ideology even more.
http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/economics/article5733723.ece.
this is not a joke or some nutcase blog.
it's serious business.
But, but,...but.... their corporate tax rate is so low..... how could this be happening????? Impossible!
And they renounced statutory union recognition. Strange indeed!