Etude

Joined

• started 34 topics
• posted 604 times   see topics posted on
• send a message

Posts by Etude

• 
  61

  can spirituality replace religion?

  by make yourself in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  i was watching cnn, an d they asked this question and this one lady called in and claimed she wasn't raised in a religious household.

  but she remembered when she was in elementary school that this jw girl asked her if she was spritual she said no, then the jw told her she would go to hell.

  wow.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Etude

  Streets76:
  
  I guess you take “spirituality” to mean an affectation, like seeing ghosts or seeing auras around people’s heads. Since not everyone experiences that and spirituality falls in that realm, you really don't believe that there's is such a thing as spirituality in the first place. Well you are right and you are wrong. I'm not challenging your belief. But the thing is that, whether you're in one camp or the other depends on what your interpretation of spiritually is. In my case, spirituality appears to me to be a sensation that can give one a sense of wonder that fixates on things greater than everyday life. It could be as simple as the admiration I would have to see a small piece of nature, like the blazing colors of the bougainvilleas in my neighborhood or being overwhelmed with awe while attempting to conceive the vastness of space. So, I don’t think there’s anything mystical or super-terrestrial about spirituality. It’s just another function of the “flesh, bones and blood” you mentioned. So, you are right in a sense.
  
  Animals have the spark of life. But, there’s no indication that they have the peculiarity of not only self-awareness (with a few exceptions), but also of a “sense of other” that makes some want to reach to God. That’s the importance of the “G” Spot. A neurological pathology studied by Dr. Ramachandran involved a young man in his 20’s who experienced grand-mal seizures which disrupted the mechanisms which suppress or keep in check the “G” spot. The brain runs a delicate balance of chemicals. Consequently, for a period of time after the seizures the man felt he could walk on air and almost died when he tried to jump out of a window. In an overwhelming euphoria, he felt he understood everything and perceived all things at once. He felt as one with the universe. The man thought he was Jesus Christ or at times he was God himself, equipped with all the power and knowledge of everything. Under a cat scan, the “G” spot area lit up like a flare.
  
  
  It’s possible then to entertain the idea that people like Joan of Arc, Joseph Smith and yes maybe even the prophet Isaiah or the apostle John might have had similar conditions, since cannabis and LSD where not common in their time. I’m not trying to be sacrilegious and offend people who are still religious and can’t contemplate such possibilities. But the reality is that a good argument could be made for such visions as being the result of brain pathology for one reason or another. Bottom line is that we have a capacity that like any other bodily function (which includes the brain) may need some tending-to, perhaps some nurturing. And it also tells me that when it’s not working right you create groups like the JWs. When it’s cleverly manipulated, you end up with a bunch of “other sheep”.

  Etude.
• 
  61

  can spirituality replace religion?

  by make yourself in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  i was watching cnn, an d they asked this question and this one lady called in and claimed she wasn't raised in a religious household.

  but she remembered when she was in elementary school that this jw girl asked her if she was spritual she said no, then the jw told her she would go to hell.

  wow.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Etude

  Hey Terry:

  At the risk of repeating myself repeating myself, I was browsing through my old posts and found a thread I started on the subject of the "G" spot. You posted some interesting comments. Check it out (http://www.jehovahs-witness.net/jw/friends/95534/1/Do-you-stimulate-your-G-spot). Looking back, it all still makes sense to me. But damn, can I go on and on and on judging from the lengths of my posts. I had a verbal hemorrage and I'm bleedding to this day.

  Etude.
• 
  61

  can spirituality replace religion?

  by make yourself in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  i was watching cnn, an d they asked this question and this one lady called in and claimed she wasn't raised in a religious household.

  but she remembered when she was in elementary school that this jw girl asked her if she was spritual she said no, then the jw told her she would go to hell.

  wow.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Etude

  Terry:
  
  The point is not that we (as individuals) don't exist. The problem is that if we embark on a way or means to prove with any degree of certainty that we do, we have a serious problem. I believe I exist. I just can't formally prove it. That's what the philosopher (Rene Descartes) brought up a few centuries ago. In spite of that, I go on and (in order to continue the argument and accept that you exists as well even if I can't prove it), I continue to exchange ideas with people so that I don't end up in that padded cell (even if it's imaginary) like misocup suggested. That's why I acknowledge that we have a brain and that it has something that may be responsible for what we term "spiritual" feelings. I realize that for some this amounts to a bunch of esoteric bullshit, but that’s the way of the world if we dare to keep asking the really tough questions, even about the nature of our own existence.
  
  Etude.
• 
  61

  can spirituality replace religion?

  by make yourself in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  i was watching cnn, an d they asked this question and this one lady called in and claimed she wasn't raised in a religious household.

  but she remembered when she was in elementary school that this jw girl asked her if she was spritual she said no, then the jw told her she would go to hell.

  wow.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Etude

  It’s amazing to find people with the intellectual cojones to admit some tough conclusions, namely that we are physical beings and not the result of some shadow that lives inside of us. Did I get that right from you misocup and streets76? That was not easy for me to admit. Yes, I’m a monist as well. And I was not attempting to justify “spirituality” as something more significant than being left-handed. By mapping it to the brain, it simply means it’s another function (though a higher one in the sense that it involves thought) like feeling pain or wanting sex.
  
  Misocup: You’re right about not crossing into the philosophical line of whether we exist or not. It kinda leads nowhere. But like the man said: “Cogito ergo sum”. That’s hard to argue with even if we can’t prove that anything else exists. So, I was presenting the idea that there’s a consistent commonality within our delusions of life, that poking around in the supposed part of the brain will consistently yield a common delusion. I had to make some basic assumptions. Otherwise, I would never have contributed to this thread and suggest that religion is one thing and spirituality (whatever it means and with all that it encompasses) is another. While I can’t say for sure that any of you exist or that I’m even writing this tidbit and not dreaming it, I must continue to continue to pretend.
  
  Etude.
• 
  61

  can spirituality replace religion?

  by make yourself in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  i was watching cnn, an d they asked this question and this one lady called in and claimed she wasn't raised in a religious household.

  but she remembered when she was in elementary school that this jw girl asked her if she was spritual she said no, then the jw told her she would go to hell.

  wow.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Etude

  Let's not forget that if one can say that “belief is in the mind” that a good argument can be made for feelings and everything else to also be in our mind. In fact, unless one is dualist, all that we are is in our brain/body, including spirituality. I know of someone back in the 70's in New York who believed she could fly out of a 3-story window while under the influence of LSD. That was not a universal experience linked to LSD. But, the “G” spot appears to be universal even if we can't yet determine all that it does and what purpose it serves other than cause or channel those feelings that we associate with “otherness” and a sense of awe at the grandness of the universe. On a more personal level, one of my JW room mates ended up committing two suicide attempts because he was seeing monsters and hearing voices. Aside from his mind being compromised, I know the JW really screw up his head to the point that he could no longer stand the guilt and tried to off himself. It's that very pathology of the brain that has led to discoveries like the so-called “G” Spot and how alternate pathways in the brain can be created to replace lost functions.
  
  The helmet I referred to in my previous post has been used to duplicate the same or similar sensations in many an individual. Really, it's a poor man's version of what has been done in the lab many times with more sophisticated equipment. So, I believe we all have the same thing in common to one degree or another. Personally, I don't wonder if there are invisible beings. That definition, by its very nature makes it impossible for one to know if the proof is a sighting. But for me, the existence of receptors and generators in the brain like the “G” spot explain why some people insist that there are aliens out there experimenting on cattle and taking people to their ships in order to create some sort of hybrid babies. That also explains out-of-body experiences, etc, etc. This suggests to me that not only there may be a specific “seat” for “spirituality” in the brain but also for the source of mysticism and a general tendency to want to explain the unexplainable in terms of something extraterrestrial or even heavenly. I'm basing my comments on the work of Vilayanur S. Ramachandran, a behavioral neurologist that made several important discoveries while at U.C. San Diego.

  Etude.
• 
  56

  Is the Jehovah’s Witnesses organization really a cult?

  by Etude in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  im sure the question has been brought up before on this board and i imagine that for many of us the answer is patent.

  however, i recently saw a documentary on pbs regarding the mormons and it stated categorically that the church of jesus christ of latter day saints is not a cult.

  given that it has its own set of strangeness and history of revision as has the wtbts, could it also (the jw) be considered a main stream, although minor religion?.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Etude

  onTheWayOut:

  but watch out for its danger.

  Your are absolutely right. All I need is my own personal experience to realize how dangerous and insidious the WTBTS is. I don't want to call them a “mainstream” religion. I want to call them a cult. The problem is that other opinions that count don't do it for several persuasive reasons. While that may appear to simply be arguing over terms, the classification has its implications out there in the world and it adds legitimacy to these heinous groups. I'd call them every name in the book that would convey the danger and damage they create, plus a few other choice words. That doesn't advance my desire to change minds if I hear in the media that the WTBTS is a mainstream religion. I guess it's time for me to stick a fork in this conversation.
  
  Thanks everybody for you input.
  
  Etude.
• 
  56

  Is the Jehovah’s Witnesses organization really a cult?

  by Etude in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  im sure the question has been brought up before on this board and i imagine that for many of us the answer is patent.

  however, i recently saw a documentary on pbs regarding the mormons and it stated categorically that the church of jesus christ of latter day saints is not a cult.

  given that it has its own set of strangeness and history of revision as has the wtbts, could it also (the jw) be considered a main stream, although minor religion?.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Etude

  Flipper:

  I understand. But Steve Hassan is not the only and finalauthority on the subject. If you recall, the reason I started the thread was because I heard this on a program which I respect very much. The comment was about Mormons not being a cult but a world-wide mainstream religion. So, I'm not debating or even contradicting what a cult is or that the JW are a cult. The issue is that other significant individuals disagree with you and me about that. This adds to the legitimacy of the WTBTS. I wondered if there's a better way to fight that perception, not whether it is true or not. Capice?

  For example: Read the following opinion:

  The LDS meets three definitions of the term "cult:"

  "Cult" is derived from the French word "culte" which came from Latin noun "cultus." The latter is related to the Latin verb "colere" which means "to worship or give reverence to a deity."

  Theological use: Oxford English Dictionary defined "cult" as: "worship; reverential homage rendered to a divine being or beings." "a particular form or system of religious worship; especially in reference to its external rites and ceremonies." "devotion or homage to a particular person or thing."

  Thus, in its original theological meaning, the term "cult" can be applied to any group of religious believers, whether they be Mormons, Southern Baptists, Methodists, Jehovah's Witnesses, Catholics, Hindus, Muslims, Wiccans, etc.

  And....

  The LDS once met a neutral definition of the term "cult" -- but no longer:

  Sociological usages: A small religious group that exists in a state of tension with the predominant religion. A small, recently created, religious organization which is often headed by a single charismatic leader and is viewed as an spiritually innovative group. The primitive Christian movements, including Jewish Christianity, Pauline Christianity and Gnostic Christianity, would have qualified for these meanings of "cult" back in the first century CE. The LDS Church would have qualified as a "cult" in the 1830s shortly after Joseph Smith founded the Church of Christ. However, the LDS Church has been established for almost two centuries, and has in excess of 13 million adherents around the world. The sociological definition definitely does not fit. Under this definition, the LDS Church is not a cult. [The emphasis is mine]

  http://www.religioustolerance.org/ldscult.htm

  Even though a cursory google of the topic will have many, many articles supporting what you and I know to be the case, there are others with some influencial opinion that would argue differently. You and I may disagree with them, but the perception and justification for the contrary is out there and it adds legitimacy to those groups.

  Etude.
• 
  56

  Is the Jehovah’s Witnesses organization really a cult?

  by Etude in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  im sure the question has been brought up before on this board and i imagine that for many of us the answer is patent.

  however, i recently saw a documentary on pbs regarding the mormons and it stated categorically that the church of jesus christ of latter day saints is not a cult.

  given that it has its own set of strangeness and history of revision as has the wtbts, could it also (the jw) be considered a main stream, although minor religion?.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Etude

  Flipper:

  I feel the same way. But, that's not the point. And, I'm not debating what characteristics constitute a cult. Why do people that can make significant contributions to opinion (i.e. the media and some scholars) don't agree with you and me? That's the perception I want to get to the root of, which may affect my own definitions (no the way I feel about cults, especially the JW). I don't want to just care about what I opine. I want to consider what other people think that differ with my opinion in order to respond appropriately. That's all.

  Etude.
• 
  61

  can spirituality replace religion?

  by make yourself in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  i was watching cnn, an d they asked this question and this one lady called in and claimed she wasn't raised in a religious household.

  but she remembered when she was in elementary school that this jw girl asked her if she was spritual she said no, then the jw told her she would go to hell.

  wow.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Etude

  Think it's not innate? I thought someone would have picked up on the "G" Spot thing I wrote about earlier. Well, no big deal. But, check this out.

  The Neurology of the Spiritual Experience

  and click on the picture.

  Etude.
• 
  74

  Most people who are not JW's live with out moral restrain! All who have left the "Truth" regret it. June 15th WT

  by life is to short in

  1. watchtower
  2. scandals

  in the june 15th wt it says on page 9 i will just write it out as it is to hard and unbelievable to preface this.

  so here it is.. "many who today are members of the christian congregation can tell you that before learning of and adopting jehovah's righteous standards, they lived without moral restrain.

  yet, they were unsatisfied and unhappy.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Etude

  dgp, you make a great point. Although I read Dawkins, it didn't take his observations in order for me to realize that morality does not stem from religion or even from a belief in God. I noticed that early on from the scandals I witnessed at Bethel and from the good life the friends of my unbelieving father led. It didn't take long for me to realize that people will be whatever they will be no matter if they are religious or not.
  
  I'm very curious about the mind process that a JW goes through to convince him or herself that leaving the faith leads to perdition. In my own case, I had fears and apprehensions that I now recognize were aggravated by my familial conditioning and by the threat of eternal death the JW hung upon my head. I envied some people who grew up in a nurturing and secure environment who absolutely refused to drink the Kool-Aid. Having a bit of a discernment, I eventually could not ignore that little voice in the back of my mind actually asking if what I was hearing was true. Alas, I did a lot of ignoring and glossing over some of the obvious incongruities in the religion. I can picture many members of my family taking that Watchtower blue pill right now, with perhaps one exception: my older sister. She's a puzzle. She actually admitted to me that she doesn't agree with the Society that there's anything wrong with celebrating a birthday. Yet, she and her husband are faithful followers. So much so that I can't really argue with them about JW issues. It's not that she can't reason (she's quite intelligent). It's that in this respect, she will refuse even to consider anything negative about the Organization because she certain that they're right, in spite of those little troubling issues. It drives me friggin' insane.
  
  Etude.