What would I do? Everything.
We wouldn't get old or symptoms of old age either.
can anyone give me a valid reason for it?
growing old is a drag.
the witnesses idea of ever lasting life, that you will come back to your most youthful state is such a bs answer..
What would I do? Everything.
We wouldn't get old or symptoms of old age either.
at one time scientists believed that living things and non-living things were made of different material, accounting for the unique properties of living things.
this idea is called vitalism and is no longer popular.
what does remain popular (in fact is still the dominant view) is a similar idea that things that experience the world (humans, frogs, mice) are different from things that don't experience the world (potatoes, rocks, snowflakes).
I've not used my PC since circa 2012.
can anyone give me a valid reason for it?
growing old is a drag.
the witnesses idea of ever lasting life, that you will come back to your most youthful state is such a bs answer..
Not dying
at one time scientists believed that living things and non-living things were made of different material, accounting for the unique properties of living things.
this idea is called vitalism and is no longer popular.
what does remain popular (in fact is still the dominant view) is a similar idea that things that experience the world (humans, frogs, mice) are different from things that don't experience the world (potatoes, rocks, snowflakes).
Reminds me of the Dalai Lama who walked into a sandwich shop
The assistant asked what fillings he would like in his sandwich
The Dalai Lama said "make me one with everything"
(jp I can't get that site to work on my iPad)
in reverse order.
tuesday, november 21, 2017. .
bbc radio hereford and worcester - kathleen hallisey interviewed regarding jehovah's witness abuse cases.
Thank you, very useful. Eddie Mair is my favourite broadcaster so I listened PM one.
at one time scientists believed that living things and non-living things were made of different material, accounting for the unique properties of living things.
this idea is called vitalism and is no longer popular.
what does remain popular (in fact is still the dominant view) is a similar idea that things that experience the world (humans, frogs, mice) are different from things that don't experience the world (potatoes, rocks, snowflakes).
Because we view reality from the inside, and from low down, like and ant, it can be difficult to have perspective. I enjoyed the movie Koyaanisqatsi very much because it helps you have a broader perspective on the patterns of nafure, humans and machines, and their interaction with one another: the pulse of the traffic, the rhythm of the clouds, the splashes and swirls of people in their daily lives.
according to the watchtower:.
who received the ransom payment?.
why did the ransomer need to be paid?.
If there is a clear statement in the Watchtower that the ransom was paid to Jehovah I'd like to see it.
according to the watchtower:.
who received the ransom payment?.
why did the ransomer need to be paid?.
The problem with saying the ransom is paid to "divine justice" is that it makes God subject to a law greater than himself. He is not fully sovereign or almighty. But maybe the Christian God is not almighty. The JW view of God is certainly weaker than traditional Christianity in a number of respects: he is not omnipresent, he does not foresee or foreordain everything, there is (I think) even some question in JW theology about whether Jehovah created time or acts inside it.
at one time scientists believed that living things and non-living things were made of different material, accounting for the unique properties of living things.
this idea is called vitalism and is no longer popular.
what does remain popular (in fact is still the dominant view) is a similar idea that things that experience the world (humans, frogs, mice) are different from things that don't experience the world (potatoes, rocks, snowflakes).
Yes it's also possble that we don't perceive the world as it really is. I should have included this possibility, which is equally mind blowing when you think about it. It would mean there is no rational basis on which to dismiss the faith of mystics in a God beyond understanding. Because why assume that the human mind is capable of understanding the logic of arguments for or against God or other significant philosophical concerns? If we are the result of evolution from non-living matter, which in turn appeared from nothing at the Big Bang, and there is no God, then there is no reason to suppose that this process should enable humans, of all beings in the universe, to accurately perceive the world as it really is. In fact it seems rather unlikely. In which case it seems hopelessly optimistic to assume we can ask and answer questions that indicate accurate or truthful perception of reality.
according to the watchtower:.
who received the ransom payment?.
why did the ransomer need to be paid?.
Has the Watchtower ever given a straight answer to the question: who was the Ransom paid to? I think they've said it wasn't paid to the devil, but stopped short of saying it was paid to Jehovah.
If it was paid to Jehovah, didn't he pay his own ransom? How can that make sense? It's as bad as the mind-bending overlapping generation when you really think about it.
Makes me want to be Unitarian!