Dearest Aguest,
You say:
Dear one, I have also given you this "truth" - that if we draw close to the Father, He... will draw close to us... by drawing us TO the Christ. I have not disputed this "truth" one bit.
Also, John 6:44 No one can come to me unless the Father who sent me draws him.
Again, I absolutely agree: draw close to God... and He... will draw close to YOU... by means of drawing YOU... to Christ. I have spoken such truth to you. But it is WE... who must "draw close"... first.
You keep twisting the drawing to the father, on one hand you disagree with scripture, thus:
, I have also given you this "truth, that if we draw close to the Father
I have never said or implied -------- "that if we draw close to the father"
By you saying "I have also given you this truth" you are stating that I in fact said this to you, again I have never said to you "that if we draw close to the father"
Why do you keep saying I said it in this way:
Again, I absolutely agree: draw close to God... and He... will draw close to YOU...
What are you agreeing with? I never said that!
I show you scriptures that expound the fact of the Father drawing us to Jesus, and you say you agree with it, and then state the exact opposite:
But it is WE... who must "draw close"... first. "I have not disputed this "truth" one bit."
Why is it you cannot let go and stay out of the drawing that scripture is showing you?
You continue in your thinking by trying to have a hand in the drawing.
You say
But the word of my Lord is that you have NOT looked up what I have quoted to you… nor have you responded to anything that I have brought up to support what I have shared with you.
Aguest,
You gave about four verses that in no way show choice, a few pages ago. I refuted your example of the christians that were baptised in repentance, but not saved. But Appolo did not know of the the ressurection of Christ. So how could he teach it or give it. But you claim the christians were drawing themselves to God. I rebutted your positioin due to the fact that the didnt even know about a salvation to begin with. I continued to ask you what were they praying for? And you couldnt answer.
The problem you seem to be avoiding is the inablitity of yourself to refute what I have showed you the bible teaches.
Furthermore, why wont you develope your position from what the bible teaches, as I have asked for your help in doing so, that I can better understand your position.
I give you scripture on election, then you say "I absolutely agree with the example given" with that statement of concurance. then you reply with opposite statement.Im confused by your reasoning.
Dearest Aguest,
I feel like I'm in a round room with you, and I'm trying to show you what the bible teaches and that its in the corner of the room.
Its ironic you mention this:
A couple of years ago I heard someone filled with holy spirit speak in this tongue, literally. I had never heard it spoken out loud... and she did not know what the translation was. As she spoke, however, it was if my ears were "opened"... and I understood everything she said. I was shocked; she was not. Not only had I never translated a tongue...
A women sitting behind me in church(visiting I assume) Sunday told me this same thing, that "she was at a church and heard someone speaking a Aramaic tongue a recongnized it" and she knew right away something was different about it, she began to tell me how she cured her son of "autism" and that night she was going to an exorcism in North New Jersey. Well all this set me back alittle because I was very un familiar with this sorta of thing.
Ive never heard someone "speak in tongues" or the interpretation of that tongue that was spoken.
Was it prophesy this woman was speaking to you? Did this" speaking in tongue" up build a church or a non-believer, If there was not an interpreter did she keep quiet? Where you in church at the time?
Do presently " speak in tongue"
and is it prophesy, does it up build your church,. Do you feel that speaking in tongues is a sign of salvation?
Thankyou in advance
ellderwho