NEW LIGHT

by Jang 2 Replies latest jw friends

  • Jang
    Jang

    (Completely fiction, but shows how anything can be manipulated into WTBST
    reasoning)

    By Dave

    Many conscientious ones among Jehovah's people today have wondered if
    Christians should own cats. The issue is of life-or-death importance since to
    stumble a brother that Christ died for is tantamount to "putting a millstone
    around the neck and being thrown into the sea". Clearly our eternal
    salvation is involved. First let us consider what most scholars agree is the
    original Greek for the English word cat. felos domesticus meaning literally
    "a contemporary housecat with all of its beastly identifying characteristics
    and behavior." Clearly the Bible by using this kind of Original Greek shows
    beyond a doubt that the basic nature of cats is evil or "beastlike" much
    like Satan the "Original Serpent" and "the Great Dragon". There are numerous
    reasons why a Loyal Dedicated Servant of God should use their Bible-trained
    conscience to arrive at a proper understanding of why Cats are not for
    Christians. Consider the following facts with an open mind:

    1) It was a common practice in ancient Egypt to worship cats as gods. As
    Christians we are to "guard ourselves from idols" and "worship no other
    gods". Such feline influence could lead to idolatry and thereby "grieve
    Jehovah's spirit" with tragic consequences.

    2) Cats were most likely present at Herod's birthday party when John the
    Baptist was beheaded. Clearly then, as loyal Christians, why would we even
    want to associate with animals that are without a doubt of such bad
    influence remembering "bad associations spoil useful habits"? To invite cats
    in our house may result in the same grave consequences as suffered by
    John the Baptist. Clearly, God disapproved of this party. Should we not
    then disapprove of cats the way God does? Surely!

    3) Throughout history, particularly in the middle ages and reaching its
    climax in the Salem Witch Trials of the 1600's, cats were recognized as
    carriers if not direct incarnates of demons. Since cats were associated with
    the devil could we as loyal and dedicated servants of God therefore associate
    with cats and thereby associate with Satan himself the "God of this system of
    things"? Would we want to be subject to such vile influence and possible
    demonic attacks? Surely not!

    4) Nowhere in the Bible are any type of cats spoken of in favorable terms.
    In fact was it not lions of the first century who the Devil used to devour
    faithful Christians? God himself "Stopped up the mouths of lions" in Daniel's
    day. True, the small housecats of today are not lions, but being of the same
    cursed animal family used by the Devil on numerous occasions throughout
    history, would it be wise or appropriate to own one? In addition, by owning
    any type of cat, would we not give an appearance of condoning their evil
    deeds throughout recorded Bible and secular history. The Bible makes clear
    that God's people are "no part of the world" and that we are "not to share
    in the sins of others".

    5) The scriptures clearly indicate that neither Abraham, Isaac,Jacob, Job,
    the Apostles , or Jesus himself owned a cat. This was most likely because they
    didn't want to be like the Pagan contemporaries of their day who showed no
    regard for how God feels about owning cats. In harmony with the pattern
    set by the faithful prophets of old, surely it would not be fitting for a
    Christian today to own a cat.

    6) Finally, cats are unclean animals. Some unclean practices indulged in by
    cats include coughing up furballs,licking inappropriate body areas,urinating
    on the floor, eating dead animals with their blood, sexual misconduct without
    the benefit of marriage, abuse of catnip, and stealing food from the table,
    just to name a few. Uncleanness is one of the "works of the flesh"
    condemned by the apostle Paul. The Bible clearly shows that "neither
    fornicators ..........or thieves will not inherit the Kingdom". In addition
    Paul admonishes us to "quit mixing in company" with such unclean ones.
    Although the Apostle Paul was speaking primarily about Christians who fell
    into sin, there is no reason to conclude that this Inspired Biblical
    principle can not be applied to association with cats. Uncleanness is
    condemned by Jehovah and the fact that the Apostle Paul made no distinction
    when it came to associating with housecats proves beyond a doubt that Loyal
    Christians must avoid all association with such animals.

    Are we not grateful for this new light coming from God's organization?
    Sister Catless tells us that since getting rid of her cat she has not had to
    be preoccupied with cleaning the litterbox and now has alot more time to go
    pioneering. Brother Bobcat puts it this way, "I'm so grateful that God
    freed me of the burden of owning a cat. I hope all of the brothers will
    realize how the devil uses cats to corrupt us and distract from the preaching
    work."(Matt 24:14) What fine examples of faithfulness! As loyal followers
    of Christ's thinking on this matter, we can rejoice in the fact that in the
    new system God will reward all of our efforts to maintain integrity by loyally
    submitting to the leading of his spirit through the "Faithful and discreet
    slave".

    JanG
    CAIC Website: http://caic.org.au/zjws.htm
    Personal Webpage: http://uq.net.au/~zzjgroen/

  • patio34
    patio34

    LOL Jan!!

    And the WT reasoning was so clear! Why didn't we see it before??

    Pat

  • blondie
    blondie

    The Society has always had a negative view of pets...no pets at Bethel...

    "Whereas at first a person might think that it would be pleasant to have a pet around the home, without reasonableness being manifested he could get to the point of spending inordinate amounts of money, time and attention on the pet."

    *** g80 3/22 15 Pets and People ***
    Having a Balanced Viewpoint
    For many people, caring for a pet is a precious part of their lives. The pet’s affection and loyalty, individual traits and ability to react to its owner bring much pleasure.

    Others find that their circumstances, desires or way of life restrict the time or facilities that they could provide, and so they decide against obtaining or keeping a pet.

    Yes, pets can certainly bring much joy to man. But it is good to keep a balanced viewpoint of them, because pets can never replace or equal good relationships with other people.

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit