Fred Franz Discredited a GB Part I

by RationalWitness 8 Replies latest jw friends

  • RationalWitness
    RationalWitness

    Today's history lesson …

    Fred Franz Discredited a "Governing Body"

    The last page of the February 1, 1976, Watchtower, was devoted to a notification entitled "Governing Body Adjustments." The article advised that the Governing Body had, as of January 1, 1976, formed six supervisory committees: Service Committee, Writing Committee, Publishing Committee, Teaching Committee, Personnel Committee, and Chairman's Committee. This was, of course, big news in the world of JWs. Prior to this time virtually all important policy- and procedure-making decisions depended ultimately upon the approval of one man--the Society's president, Nathan H. Knorr. The February 1 article did not elaborate, but it soon became clear within Brooklyn Bethel that these committees were now operating with a measure of authority that previously had been possessed only by Knorr. The president of the Society no longer wielded absolute, total control.

    A year later, in the January 1, 1977, Watchtower, the article "Serving With the Faithful Slave" said regarding these changes (in paragraph 16):

    To meet further demands of expansion, it was arranged in 1971 to increase the number of "older men" serving as the Governing Body of Jehovah's Witnesses from seven (the directors of the Watch Tower Society) to a total of eleven members. Further expansion, to eighteen members, took place late in 1974; of these, John Groh has since finished his earthly course. And it was during the next year, 1975, that one of the most significant organizational readjustments in the 100-year history of the modern-day witnesses of Jehovah came under consideration. After discussions that continued through most of that year, the reorganization was approved on December 4, 1975, by a unanimous vote of the seventeen members of the Governing Body. It became operative from January 1, 1976.

    This article then continued on (in paragraph 17) to outline how the recently formed committees operated:

    "Under this one Head [Jesus Christ], the anointed members of the Governing Body serve as equals, with a chairman rotating alphabetically each year. Administrative responsibilities are divided among the Chairman's Committee of three members (comprising the chairman for the current year, for the previous year and for the year to follow), and five permanent committees of from five to seven members, which oversee the activities of Jehovah's Witnesses world wide."
    The mention of "a unanimous vote" suggests that there was little or no disagreement about divesting President Knorr of complete control over operations of the Society and making all members of the Governing Body "equals". Why, then, did it require nearly a year's worth of discussion?

    While very few at the time realized it, just four months prior to this "empowerment" of the Governing Body, Society Vice President Fred Franz had revealed some clues about the discussions that were then still taking place. In his September 7, 1975, Gilead Graduation talk, Fred Franz revealed his personal feelings about what was then being debated and negotiated among the seventeen Governing Body members, and in so doing Scripturally disproved the existence of any Christian "Governing Body."

    To make his point that the graduating missionaries were being sent out by the Watch Tower Society--and NOT by any "Governing Body", he drew upon the example of those evangelizers sent out by the Antioch Congregation of the first century. Here are excerpts from a transcript of his talk [I have retained Franz's word whiskers and verbal gaffs, even though this at times interferes with the fluidity of reading; all caps have been used where he raised his voice for emphasis, and bolding has been used to identify key thoughts]:

    Well, you missionaries, you're being sent forth today, after your graduation as missionaries. The last, eh, telegram we heard was about two being sent to Bolivia. There were others who're being sent, maybe four or six or, or eight to a, a different country as assignment for work. Now don't you missionaries think because you are being sent forth two together, or maybe four or six or maybe eight, that you are being sent forth as a committee to take over the work in the land to which you're assigned. No such thing. You are being sent forth as individual missionaries to cooperate together, and to cooperate with the branch of the Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society which is operating and directing the work in the land to which you are assigned to act as an evangelizer. So don't get this committee idea into your head because you're being sent out in groups to a special land.

    Now, Jesus Christ finished his course as the greatest evangelizer of all. And then time moves on, and there is a man who comes on the scene, and he is the only one who is directly called an evangelizer; that's his personal title--we find it in Acts chapter 21, verse 8. And that is Philip of Caesarea. And when Paul visited him on his stopover there at Caesarea, why he was called "Philip the evangelizer." He's the only one! Paul told Timothy in his final letter, 2 Timothy 4:5, that he should "do the work of an evangelizer." But Philip is the one who is directly--and the only one--thus called personally "an evangelizer." But of course we know there were other evangelizers. Now how did this man come on the scene, and who made him an evangelizer or missionary? Now that's the point to observe. Well, we remember how the scripture in Ephesians four, verse eleven, tells us how the Lord Jesus Christ ascended on high and led a body of captive, and how he gave "gifts" in the form of men. Verse eleven says he gave some as apostles and some as prophets and some as evangelizers … and some as shepherds and teachers. The Lord Jesus Christ, the head of the Congregation … he gave not only apostles, not only prophets, but also evangelizers.

    [ … contents abbreviated … ]

    And then after that, what happened? Why, God's, Jehovah's angel talks to Philip and says, 'Now you go.' This is … the assignment for you, from Jehovah's angel. 'You go down to the road that leads south from Jerusalem to Gaza.' And he went down there on that assignment from Jehovah's angel. And then is when he had the encounter with the Ethiopian eunuch. And he baptized him, and after the baptism, why he was quickly caught away, or led away, by God's spirit. And he went down there to the Philistine people, then up the coast of Caesarea, where he settled down and he had four daughters, and he was there as an evangelist when the apostle Paul came on that boat trip back to the Holy Land. And so that's what happened with Philip, how he became an evangelizer. Now these are things to note, friends.

    Then something happened right after that. And, eh, the Lord Jesus Christ took action. And he took direct action without consulting any man or body of men on earth. And that's when He, the Head of the Congregation, met Saul of Tarsus, the persecutor there, on the road leading to Damascus. He stopped him! And he said , 'Now, this is a chosen vessel unto me. I'm choosing him as the Head of the Church, without consulting any people on earth.' And he chose Saul to be an evangelizer, to carry the message not only to the Jews but also to all the gentile nations.

    Well, what about Jerusalem and the body down there? Later on the account tells us that Barnabas took Paul, or Saul of Tarsus, down to Jerusalem. But they were all afraid of him! And Saul of Tarsus, or Paul, tells us that when he went up there to Jerusalem he saw none of the apostles except Peter, with whom he spent fifteen days, and also, uh, the apostle James. [Nota bene: this is an error, as Galatians 1:18, 19 indicates it was "James the brother of the Lord," not the apostle James.] Those are the only two. And then he went back to Tarsus, and, uh, he continued on his way. Later on, why, Barnabas was sent down there to Antioch, and he hunted up Saul, brought him there, and, uh, they talked in Antioch for quite a while. Paul became a member of the Antioch congregation. And he was one of the prophets there in that congregation, specially mentioned. And then, all of a sudden, as he was serving there, uh, in Antioch, in Syria … not in Israel, but in Syria … why, God's spirit spoke to that congregation there in Antioch and said, 'Now, of all things you set aside, you, this congregation in Antioch, YOU set aside these two men, namely, Barnabas and Saul, for the work for which I have commissioned them.' And so the Antioch congregation did that! And they laid their hands upon Paul, or Saul, and Barnabas and sent them forth as a number of translations read … 'sent them forth.' And then they went forth by the holy spirit operating through the Antioch congregation, and they went out on their first missionary assignment.

    So you see, the Lord Jesus Christ was acting as Head of the congregation and taking action directly, without consulting anybody here on earth what he could do or what he could NOT do. And he acted in that way with regard to, to Saul and Barnabas. And they were both apostles of the Antioch congregation. And so they went out on the work and had great success, and in course of time they completed their first missionary tour, and where did they go … where did they report? Well, there's a record, you read it for yourself in the closing verses of the fourteenth chapter of Acts: THEY WENT BACK TO ANTIOCH, TO THE CONGREGATION THERE, and the account says they related things in detail to them, to this congregation that had committed them to the undeserved kindness of God for the work that they had performed. So there's where they reported. So the record also says, now they stayed in Antioch not a little time.

    Well, now, what happened? All of a sudden something, eh, occurs, and, uh, Paul and Barnabas, they go up to Jerusalem. Well, what's the matter? What brings them up to Jerusalem? Well, is it, uh, the body of apostles and of other elders of the Jerusalem congregation that have summoned them up there and said, 'Looka here. We have heard that you two men have gone out on a missionary tour … and you finished it, and you haven't come up here to Jerusalem to report to us. DO YOU KNOW WHO WE ARE? We're the Counsel of Jerusalem! Do you two recognize the headship of the Lord Jesus Christ? If you don't come on up here in a hurry, we're going to take disciplinary action against you.' Is that what the account says? Well, if they had acted that way toward Paul and Barnabas, because they reported to the congregation, uh, by means of which the holy spirit had sent them out, then this Counsel of Jerusalem, of apostles and of other elders of the Jewish congregation would have put themselves ABOVE the headship of the Lord Jesus Christ.

    But that isn't what occurred. You know what happened, how Jews came down from Jerusalem and stirred up the matter of circumcision, and, eh, it troubled the congregation there in Antioch so much that the ANTIOCH congregation sent Paul and Barnabas UP TO JERUSALEM, to have the Counsel settle the issue. And, of course, being sent by the Couns … by the congregation at Antioch, they had to come back and report and advise the congregation of the settlement of the question, or the decision that was made by the Counsel there at Jerusalem. And THEN it was, when they were arguing in favor of Christians from the gentiles not having to be circumcised like Jews … it was THEN that Paul and Barnabas told what God had done by means of them in the gentile world. And THEN it was that the counsel got the report. Then they went back to Antico...och,, which had sent them forth to make known the decision, and the Jewish, then, eh, Counsel , why, sent along two men, Judas and Silas, with them. And so they delivered the report from the Counsel and, eh, there was great rejoicing among the gentile believers.

    Now time passes, and Paul and Barnabas are at Antioch. And what occurs now? Well, did they receive an assignment from somewhere … on their next move? The account says that, eh, the two men, Paul and Barnabas, Paul says to him, he says, 'Of all things let us go and visit the congregations that we have established.' And, eh, they were agreed on, on this matter. And then, eh, the matter of, uh, accompaniment came up-who was gonna go with them? And, eh, Barnabas was in favor of Mark … John Mark. But, eh, Paul didn't want him, because he had left them in Pamphylia in Asia Minor and had not gone along with them to the finish of the first missionary tour. So Paul didn't have any confidence, eh, in Mark for the time being. And they had a great altercation, as you know. And it resulted in a split! And Barnabas took along Mark, and it proved to be a good choice, because afterwards Paul appreciated now the faithfulness of Mark and said, 'He's a useful servant even to me.'

    But what about Paul? Well, he chose Silas, or Silvanus, as his companion in his missionary tour. And here's one thing we must note again … now this happened up in Antioch. Toward the close of the fifteenth chapter of Acts it says that after Paul and Barnabas had been commended by the brothers of the Antioch congregation to the undeserved kindness of God, that they went forth on the second missionary tour of the apostle Paul. So again the Antioch congregation is being used to send out missionaries. …

    And so, as we examine this account of these two most outstanding among the missionaries, uh, recorded, in, uh, Bible history, we find that they were sent out especially by the Lord Jesus Christ, the Head of the Church … a fact which the Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society has upheld and accepted ever since the Society was formed. So we see how the Lord Jesus Christ as the Head of the Church has a right to act direct, without other organizations in view, no matter WHO we are. He's the Head of the Church, and we can't challenge what HE does.

    End of Part I

  • Moxy
    Moxy

    whats interesting about this is that the explanation here given for acts 15 makes a lot more sense than the current understanding, needed so desperately to support the GB arrangement.

    mox

  • Maximus
    Maximus

    Not surprisingly, however, it was the inimitable Frederick who laid out the theological groundwork for the change, in the Watchtower. (Recall that the term then was merely "governing body," without capitalization--says much.) He told this inquirer that it was his loyal duty to insure the organization's survival; he had attempted to stimulate it with the 1975 speculation, of course.

    We now have men not of the anointed but who have "taken the lead" in directing JW activity for a half century--as Don Adams and others, some of who are not directors of any of the corporations. What distinguishes current governing body members from corporate directors is not their organizational experience, depth of spirituality or particular wisdom. It's the fact they partake of the emblems yearly.

    With grey-headed ones dying off, and replacement by younger members who have not had the vast experience of these OS mentioned, there is a perception problem among observers. Do these men evidence the gravitas for such weighty decisions as come before the GB? One way to solve it is to say that the governing body is in fact that group of individuals at the top who are taking the lead, whether OS or A. Watch Fred's Gilead argumentation employed again one day.

    RW, I'm sure you know by now which of those original committees is still viable and functioning, despite smooth assurances that everything is just the same, with the GB focussing on the preaching work.

    I'm waiting for Part II.

    Warmly,
    Max

  • RationalWitness
    RationalWitness

    Maximus,

    Are you suggesting that before long, membership in these committees is what will define the constituency of the Governing Body, i.e., appointment to a committee will designate the one appointed (whether OS or A) as a member of the "Governing Body of Jehovah's Witnesses." This would, I think, be much closer to the way the Society used the term "governing body" (lowercase) throughout the eras prior to 1971.

    Warm regards,
    Rational

    P.S. Part II has already been posted; I have brought it to the top for your convenience.

  • voltaire
    voltaire

    Excellent post! More than anything else, I appreciate knowledge of the inner workings of the organization. I grew up with an almost superstitious view of the governing body and any annointed I happened to know. I'm looking forward to the second part.

  • willy_think
  • Dogpatch
    Dogpatch

    Oh my God!
    I remember being in the graduation class theatre (La Merc) and listening to these very words. How did you get the transcript?
    I could kick myself for not having taped that Franz talk that day.
    It was so obvious to me that Franz hated this development. I remember one week, as he sat at the table head sometime in 76 or 77 he wore a T-SHIRT to breakfast with the logo: "Where in the Hell is McCook, Nebraska?" the week after Sydlik announced that Bethelites (and especially table heads) should come to meals as if they were meetings (dressed up). Franz was flipping them the finger, and he did this many times.
    http://www.freeminds.org

  • outnfree
    outnfree

    Rational,

    It took me almost a week to get the time to read this, and I wanted to thank you for posting it. I remember reading excerpts from it in [i]In Search of Christian Freedom[/b], but it's nice to have the whole thing available.

    I, too, after reading the excerpts, felt like Maximus. With the older GB anointed members dying off, Freddy's understanding of the gb's role in the 1st century could certainly become "new light."

    I'm also happy that posting this reply brings this back to the top for others who might have missed it the first time.

    On to Part II!

    outnfree

  • MacHislopp
    MacHislopp

    Hello Rationalwitness,

    thanks for the excellent information.

    I've checked the bound volumes, and surprise...

    there is made a report of the Gilead Graduation day,

    with points from the various speakers...but NONE

    from br. FRANZ!

    I do agree on your statement about the -governing body -

    "...Fred Franz revealed his personal feelings about what was then being debated and negotiated among the seventeen Governing Body members, and in so doing Scripturally disproved the existence of any Christian "Governing Body."

    Greetings, J.C.MacHislopp

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit