Well, This about takes the cake. This was posted about me on a politics newsgroup. (Stephanus substituted for my real name) And you thought there were trolls on THIS board! LOL
What is going on here people? You all sound like you have
just been let out of a 30 years solitary confinement?This group needs some livening up. Stephanus what are
you up to? I have a piece for your nz.politics page.My thoughts about Mr. Stephanus
On behalf of several members of the community, I would like to express my
shock and disappointment at some of Mr. Stephanus's allegations.With this letter, I hope to protect our peace, privacy, and safety.
But first, I would like to make the following introductory remark:
The reason Stephanus wants to procure explosive devices, gasoline, and detonators
for use in an upcoming campaign of terror is that he's completely squalid.If you believe you have another explanation for his cynical, conniving behavior,
then please write and tell me about it. In order to convince us that obscurity,
evasiveness, incomprehensibility, indirectness, and ambiguity are marks of
depth and brilliance, Stephanus often turns to the old propagandist trick of comparing
results brought about by entirely dissimilar causes.If the mass news media were actually in the business of covering news rather
than molding public attitudes to replace the search for truth with a situationist
relativism based on fatuous faddism, they would unequivocally report that
this is the very source of the careerism of which I accuse him -- justly,
as is now more clear than ever. If you don't believe me, see for yourself.Stephanus is dead set on defending his position against what I have to say, regardless
of what I have to say. I'm not going to say why; we all know the reason.I have a dream, a mission, a set path that I would like to travel down.
Specifically, my goal is to protect innocent, people on nz.pols' from ungrateful,
disorderly prima donnas like him.Of course, he has managed to convince a bunch of offensive, yellow-bellied
mafia dons to help him practice human sacrifice on a grand scale in some
sort of predatory, combative death cult. What was the quid pro quo there?
If I'm not mistaken, there's a painfully simple answer. It regards the way
that if you've read this far, then you probably either agree with me or are
on the way to agreeing with me.Judging by the generally domineering nature of Stephanus's representatives, I
can see that I find that I am embarrassed. Embarrassed that some people just
don't realize that I want to thank Stephanus for his deeds. They give me an excellent
opportunity to illustrate just how laudable Stephanus can be.He will probably respond to this letter just like he responds to all criticism.
He will put me down as "crazy" or "noxious". That's his standard answer to
everyone who says or writes anything about him except the most fawning praise.Stephanus's faculty for deception is so far above anyone else's, it really must
be considered different in kind as well as in degree.Stephanus's surrogates perpetrate all kinds of atrocities while alleging that
they are simply not capable of such activities and that therefore, the atrocities
must be the product of my and your feverish and overworked imaginations.The communicative efficacy of Stephanus's connection with officious, meddlesome
busybodies will cause sullen lunkheads to palliate and excuse the atrocities
of Stephanus's confreres sometime soon.Here, too, the exception proves the rule: Stephanus disguises his iron fist with
a velvet glove. To pretend otherwise is nothing but hypocrisy and unwillingness
to face the more unpleasant realities of life.Faith is harder to shake than knowledge, love succumbs less to change than
respect, hate is more enduring than aversion, and his arrogance will lead
him to subvert existing lines of power and information in a matter of days.Well, that's getting away from my main topic, which is that I want to speak
up and speak out against Stephanus. I want to do this not because I need to tack
another line onto my résumé, but because Stephanus has been known to say that
a richly evocative description of a problem automatically implies the correct
solution to that problem. That notion is so self-deceiving, I hardly know
where to begin refuting it.No group has done so much to overthrow all concepts of beauty and sublimity,
of the noble and the good, and instead drag people down into the sphere of
Stephanus's own base nature as Stephanus's vicegerents on nz.politics. The reason is
simple: If we contradict Stephanus, we are labelled lecherous heavy metal fans.
If we capitulate, however, we forfeit our freedoms.His harangues are just a rhetorical ploy to get away from the obvious fact
that extremism has never been successful in the long run. And I can say that
with a clear conscience, because he is trying to deflect attention from his
tendentious ideals.You may have detected a hint of sarcasm in the way I phrased that last statement,
but I assure you that I am not exaggerating the situation. I apologize if
what I'm saying sounds painfully obvious, painfully self-evident. However,
it is so extremely important that I must sincerely say it. If Stephanus has spurred
us to shape nz.politics with dignity and harmony, a forum of justice, solidarity,
liberty, and prosperity, then Stephanus may have accomplished a useful thing.He has never gotten ahead because of his hard work or innovative ideas.
Rather, all of his successes are due to kickbacks, bribes, black market double-dealing,
outright thuggery, and unsavory political intrigue. And that's it. I have
had to restrain myself from rebuking Mr. Stephanus more vehemently.Come on people move out of this rut. Go and read the news on
mai.flora.org and become international experts.