Okay, here's one for those of you interested in consciousness and such, or maybe those who happen to find it interesting at the moment. If not of course you are free to click away and return to your regularly scheduled programming.
I was reading some Ken Wilber and was thinking of the point about different stages of development, that different consciousness can be a temporary state, an experience or basically a stable structure of consciousness. It occurred to me that perhaps what is more significant is not the specific stages that outlines how one functions like the formal operational stage of Piaget, but actually peace itself.
Of course peace in itself cannot be considered a structure per se, but rather it would exist in spite of all forms of structure. Certainly in everyday life most of us know some who are more knee-jerk reactionary as opposed to others who are not so disturbed by every little thing. But the important thing I want to point out here is if we have this peace that is in spite of structure, then that implies it is a peace that is not dependent on conditions, in other words not dependent on a certain state of affairs, things being a certain way. I think this is significant to point out because most of the time people do look for a certain condition, be it something immediate such as having a good job to feed yourself or good relationship(s) or whatever, which may be relevant to a certain homeostasis, but that is not what I am pointing to as peace itself. This also opens up that kind of chicken or the egg thing: Does peace come from the outside in (state dependent and conditional) or from the inside out? If it is an 'inner peace' as the cliche actually indicates, then what is that? What is it like?
No, this isn't anything new really - and actually that's exactly the point.