page 15 states: "Valentina married and moved with her husband to ingelheim, germany, in 1993. they have three children, who are all baptized witnesses of Jehovah."
does anyone find this statement a little strange? even if they had their first kid right after being wed, he/she would still only be 11. and THEY ARE ALL BAPTIZED... there is a picture of the family... there are no triplets in the picture, and they are all young... so the sentence means how it reads. ALL BAPTIZED. i thought the watchtower at some point in space/time stated that they do not allow or at least do not encourage minors to get baptized... wasnt there a watchtower -written no doubt by one of the lawyers- talking about how it is not a practise among Jehovah's Witnesses to allow children to be baptized? the youngest member of this family could be no more than 9 years old. might as well have baptized her when she was an infant.
actually the whole article is pretty stupid... take the time to read it and get the full gist of it. and then get as mad as i did