News Article: Why American Muslim Converts Turn to Terrorism

by Elsewhere 7 Replies latest jw friends

  • Elsewhere
    Elsewhere

    http://www.humaneventsonline.com/article.php?id=4063

    Why American Muslim Converts Turn to Terrorism

    by Robert Spencer
    Posted Jun 3, 2004



    Just as they did in the cases of Gadahn's fellow Muslim converts (John Walker Lindh, Richard Reid, and others), Western analysts have ascribed Gadahn's involvement with Al Qaeda as a product of his alienation. Gadahn obligingly expresses this alienation in a written account of his conversion, revealing that he "had become obsessed with demonic Heavy Metal music" and even "eschewed personal cleanliness." Around that time he discovered Islam by cruising the Internet.

    Unfortunately, Gadahn's conversion story ends before he landed in the Al Qaeda camp. All the talk of disaffected youth that has filled the airwaves over the last few days doesn't even come close to explaining that. Gadahn could have just as easily become a Jehovah's Witness, or a Mormon, or a follower of Phish. None of those choices, made daily by other disaffected youth, would have landed him in a terrorist training camp and made him the new face of Al Qaeda. Why did his choice of Islam do so?

    Western converts must approach the Qur'an and other Islamic texts without the culturally ingrained ways of understanding them that Muslims pick up in Islamic societies. Thus they come to Islam more or less in a pure, abstract form. The force of any given passage of Qur'an or Hadith, not blunted by culture or familiarity, can be presented by whoever instructs the convert with any spin the teacher might favor. Gadahn and other Western converts were probably recruited by straightforward appeals to numerous passages in the Qur'an and Sunnah. Violent jihad is founded on numerous verses of the Qur'an -- most notably, one known as the "Verse of the Sword": "Slay the idolaters wherever ye find them . . . " (Sura 9:5).

    Such verses are not taken "out of context" to justify armed jihad by radical imams such as those who may have taught Gadahn; on the contrary, that's how they have been understood by Muslims from the beginning of Islam. One manual of Islamic law, which in 1991 gained the approval of Cairo's influential Al-Azhar University as conforming "to the practice and faith of the orthodox Sunni community," is quite specific about the meaning of jihad.

    It is, it says, "war against non-Muslims."

    This manual stipulates that the Muslim community "makes war upon Jews, Christians, and Zoroastrians . . . until they become Muslim or pay the non-Muslim poll tax." The requirement that non-Muslims first be "invited" to enter Islam and then warred against until they either convert or pay the jizya, a special tax on non-Muslims, is founded upon the Qur'an: "Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the religion of Truth, (even if they are) of the People of the Book, until they pay the Jizya with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued" (Sura 9:29).

    This is the explanation that radical Muslim spokesmen around the world have given for what they're doing: they are not terrorists, they are mujahedin, warriors of jihad. In this they are carrying on an illustrious tradition: violent jihad is a constant of Islamic history. Although after the Muslim siege of Vienna was broken in 1683 jihads became less common (at least in Europe), at no point did Islamic theology reject the doctrine of jihad. It can always be revived again where possible and necessary.

    Yet the simple fact that violent jihad remained and remains today a vital component of Islamic theology is today smothered under a fog of political correctness. This plays into the hands of Islamic radicals by making it unnecessary for self-proclaimed moderates to renounce these doctrines, or even to acknowledge their existence. But unless or until a large number of Muslims around the world do so, the call to violent jihad will continue to inspire young people like Gadahn.

    Thus whenever someone proclaims that Islam is a religion of peace that has been hijacked by a tiny minority of extremists (instead of a religion that contains a violent doctrine that sets it at odds with the rest of world and cries out for reform), they are helping to make sure that more and more disaffected youth like Adam Gadahn will end up in radical Muslim training camps -- and will eventually carry their struggle back to their infidel homeland.

  • Gadget
    Gadget

    Thanks for posting this. would it mean that the people who want to negotiate with terrorist would have about the same chance as if they were negotiating with a witness to show them how wrong the wbts is?

  • metatron
    metatron

    They turn to terrorism because they are taught a principle the Watchtower exploits:

    unmerited superiority!

    You are taught that You are Led By God. You are Favored by God - and that others are spiritually inferior beings, worthy

    of destruction. This religious egotism appeals to people with poor education and a low standard of living - with the fanatic

    often blinded to the fact that much of his disadvantaged position is because of his restrictive religion.

    This unmerited self-exaltation runs squarely into the prosperity of the "wicked" people. Muslims interviewed in the West

    often said they felt 'like nothing', or like 'nobodies' in a vast secular society of wealth.

    Voila! Kill a bunch of people in Allah's name - or hope for their deaths at Armageddon - and then they feel better

    metatron

  • ThiChi
    ThiChi

    One only has to look at the last 1900 years of Muslim History to understand what is taking place today.

    It took Western Europe hundreds of years to repel Muslim?s invasions and to challenge their conquests. For Spain, this effort was called the Reconquesta, where the Christian Kingdoms helped Spain to regain her lands from the Moors (Muslims).

  • Simon
    Simon

    Europe repel Muslim invaders?

    I think it was the other way round wasn't it ... Europe invading the "holy land" at the behest of the Pope.

  • ThiChi
    ThiChi

    Simon, History shows The Christian Kingdoms each time responded to a Muslim Invasion or Conquest.

    As an example, the Reconquista, or the invasion of the Moors (Muslims) in Spain. If the Christian Kingdoms did not respond to the Muslin Invasion of Spain, Spain would not exist as we know it today. The Crusades slowed and stopped/repelled in most cases, the Muslim onslaught in Western Europe.

    A good book is "A Concise History of the Crusades" by Thomas Madden

    Pope Urban III made the call after the Muslims invaded Palestine and repealed the existing Christians and Jews there by putting them to death. The Battle of Hadden was a good example of Muslim aggression.

    There can be little doubt that the Crusades slowed the advance of Islam. The presence of the Crusader states in the Near East for almost two centuries certainly destabilized Muslim power and therefore hindered unification into a single Islamic state.

    The Crusades bought western Europe some time. Judging by the number of occasions on which Europe narrowly escaped Turkish invasion in the 15 th and 16 th centuries, Europe had need of that time.

    Give credit where credit is due.

  • Crazy151drinker
    Crazy151drinker

    Simon Simon Simon, why do you always take the Muslim side of things. The crusades were a complete failure. If you want to complain about people killing muslims then direct your anger at the Mongols who almost completely whiped them out.

  • ThiChi
    ThiChi

    Well,

    The repel of the Muslim invasion in Spain was a success.

    The First Crusade was a Success.

    The Second was mixed,

    The Third Crusade, lead by Richard the LionHeart was a success in the liberation of Cypress and he opened the sea ports of Acre and Antioch, and he won the right of Christians and Jews to visit the Holy Land unmolested. And he slowed the aggression of Islam on Constantinople.

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit