Alexander Hislop's The Two Babylons online

by VM44 2 Replies latest jw friends

  • VM44
    VM44

    The Watchtower used to quote from Alexander Hislop's book, The Two Babylons, to show the pagan origin of the Cross, Christmass trees, holidays and so on.

    The full title of the book is:

    "The Two Babylons or The Papal Worship: Proved to be the Worship of Nimrod and his Wife"

    and you can see just from the title where the bad influence on religion is attributed.

    I believe the book at one time was even available to order at the Kingdom Hall literature counter!

    An online PDF version including the illustrations is available at:

    http://www.eaec.org/bookstore/The%20Two%20Babylons%20-%20Alexander%20Hislop.pdf

    Ralph Woodrow has written a book, THE BABYLON CONNECTION?, exposing the bad scholarship contained in Hislop.

    http://www.ralphwoodrow.org/books/babylon.htm

    A good review of The Two Bablyons is at:

    http://www.geocities.com/jayce8565/babylon.html

    The reviewer writes,

    "It is rather unnerving to realize that a "classic" reference work could be accepted for so long, for the most part unquestioned, without many of it's short comings being previously exposed to public view, but to a large extent that seems to be exactly what has happened."

    --VM44

  • imallgrowedup
    imallgrowedup

    Thanks, VM!

    This should prove to be interesting reading. In the meantime, I have found myself pondering how the WT can point their fingers at "Christendom" and say it's many beliefs and practices are based on paganism, when their own religion was originally based on pyramidology, astrology, and phrenology. How can they say that celebrating Christmas (which us "pagans" celebrate one day out of the year) is bad because it is based on paganism, when using the logic they use, their entire religion is based on paganism and they live it 24/7/365? Makes no sense to me.......

    growedup

  • Panda
    Panda

    I bought mine at the KH years ago. I think it was maybe $2 or $4 ??? I agree that some of the summations are flawed but there is still plenty of interesting stuff... especially the appendices.

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit