I know that technically speaking, the WTBS has left voting as a "matter of conscience" in certain articles, but growing up JW, in practice, voting was always strictly forbidden.
With our referendum elections going on in Texas, I got to wondering whether they just avoided political elections? Or are all sorts of political voting forbidden, such as on propositions? For instance, should certain types of taxes be allowed to increase for disabled people? Should the government limit medical damage awards or let a jury decide? ... those sorts of things.
Suppose there were a referendum on ballot that would somehow hurt the JWs? Let's say they were going to be taxed on their Kingdom Halls, or not allowed to go door-to-door without an expensive permit. I know they've spent time and effort to fight such laws in court. Would they send their followers to the polls to vote against such laws if the situation arose? If they could strike down such a proposal through voting, they could save a lot of money on court battles fighting it or in costs if the law stays in effect.
If it's still an issue of staying neutral and not going to the polls, then why not stay neutral? Why fight these things in legal battles later? Why not pay Ceasars things to Ceasar?