VERY IMPORTANT INFO ABOUT VIRUSES!!!!!

by little witch 9 Replies latest jw friends

  • little witch
    little witch

    As we all know, microsoft has been patching left and right, without actually stopping the entry altogether of viruses.

    I want to share this information with you all. I just did this, and the vulnerablility is fixed, permanantly.

    Firstly, this info came from Leo, on tech tv, and he highly recommends doing this asap, there is a new worm released yesterday.

    Here is the website to download a tiny program to fix this big headache. It will explain EVERYTHING about the vulnerability, and close its port of entry.

    http://grc.com/dcom/

    Or type in DCOMbobulator on your search engine.

    It is a very simple program, very small. It only takes seconds to download and use.

  • ballistic
    ballistic

    I am very skeptical about this advice. The web site states that "no one" uses DCOM and it can therefore be shut down. But Norton Antivirus uses the DCOM for a start!!! I wouldn't interfere with the functionality of Norton Antivirus to even try it.

  • drwtsn32
    drwtsn32

    Interesting, but don't let this give you a false sense of security. This will not make you immune to all viruses.

    Disabling unnecessary services (such as DCOM) will make you invulnerable to attacks that utilize flaws in those services.

    The reason Microsoft doesn't do the same thing (disable DCOM) is because it's not truly a fix. The real fix involves fixing the flaws in the DCOM service.

    I still recommend that people either use a hardware router or a software based firewall. It would have protected them from exploits such as this.

  • drwtsn32
    drwtsn32

    ballistic: You are wise to question the advice. I find Steve Gibson (grc.com) makes sweeping generalizations at times. Personally I would not disable DCOM; I'd protect myself with some sort of firewall.

  • little witch
    little witch

    You are right, Ballistic.

    It mentions some programs need to use port 135, but that can be left open.

    The program does two things. It can shut that port, and/or shut down dcom.

    I didnt have to shut down my port since I am both behind a firewall, and my isp has fixed the port.

  • ballistic
    ballistic

    Bill Gates says

    Warning If you disable DCOM, may you may lose operating system functionality. After you disable support for DCOM, the following may result:

    • Any COM objects that can be activated remotely may not function correctly.
    • The local COM+ snap-in will not be able to connect to remote servers to enumerate their COM+ catalog.
    • Certificate auto-enrollment may not function correctly.
    • Windows Management Instrumentation (WMI) queries against remote servers may not function correctly.

    @ http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?kbid=825750

    It is interesting to note however that the deactivation of DCOM does indeed resolve many worm exploits.

  • little witch
    little witch

    As a caveat,

    Please read up about DCOM, using as many sources as you can find, such as the link Ballistic provided.

    Make sure this is a good thing for your situation.

    I dont think you should do this to your work computers,etc. But if you dont have a firewall, or do not

    need remote services, this may be an option.

    If anyone has any more info, or links, feel free to post. Thanks

  • drwtsn32
    drwtsn32
    It is interesting to note however that the deactivation of DCOM does indeed resolve many worm exploits.

    Actually it's not surprising. To protect against any vulnerability you could simply turn off the defective service. The problem is if you lose necessary functionality by turning off that service....

  • Simon
    Simon

    I'd be very wary of downloading any little apps off the net to fix anything.

    Stick to official patches and programs from reputable companies like Symantec, Trend etc...

    There is an app built into windows (DCOMCNFG) which allows you to enable and disable it (inc. remote DCOM) as well as set who can access which components etc...

  • little witch
    little witch

    That sounds like a better idea, Thanks Simon

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit