It was a Portrait of a Man ... Falling
PORTRAIT of a MAN FALLING
(A short story by Terry Edwin Walstrom)
“Get out of here—this is my father’s funeral; you don’t belong here; you are a liar!”
The woman’s face reflected terrible pain—the worst pain possible, to the point of breakdown. A thousand unanswered questions had been washed from her eyes by the flow of many tears. She was bent forward slightly—not from physical infirmity—but the burden of suffering; a suffering shared by her family.
A stranger was speaking to her and in his trembling hand, she caught sight of the photograph. There was pleading in his voice, a quiet voice, and something in his eyes meant her no harm . . . so she had dropped her gaze . . . and immediately collapsed.
The Editor and his staff listened quietly and a nodded hesitatingly.
“I don’t know who this is, but it’s pretty clear he was somebody.”
Faces simply stared back at him, wanted to listen, wanting to be convinced. Yet, at the same time, they didn’t want to do the wrong thing in the wrong way at this—the worst of all possible wrong times.
“A carpenter reaches for his hammer without thinking. I’m a photographer—I reached for my camera and started taking pictures . . . that’s all it was . . . that’s all.”
Outside the office, a bustle of activity bespoke controlled chaos. Like an anthill stomped upon, a flurry of busy randomness had seized everyone in an invisible panic.
“I’d like to know. But—it’s not my call. I don’t know what I’m asking, but maybe you all do.”
The clear morning sky gave bright promise to the optimism of a perfect day. It was the kind of day even the most jaded urban sophisticate could glance at sideways and give up a begrudging smile of approval.
Traffic zipped, clotted, zoomed, or stalled to the dancing red, yellow or green of the bedeviling signal lights along the avenues. Horns honked, shoe leather patted concrete sidewalks in a pattern of big city syncopation. Commuters and panhandlers went through the motions of survival at both ends of the spectrum in a Darwinian paradise of tall, tall buildings and crisp fall air.
It was 9:41.
The photographer had snatched his camera up and took off at a brisk jog exactly to the spot where he suddenly froze. The carpenter reached for his hammer without thinking about it, Richard Drew would later say to the others, just as he pointed his camera upward toward the object which had caught his professional eye in the viewfinder, and he began snapping instinctively. There was no right or wrong about it—he snapped and his lens followed as it covered almost fifteen hundred feet of vertical space, top to bottom in blink, snap- blink, snap-blink of an eye.
The theologian was asked to comment and he reluctantly agreed.
The photograph laid out in front of him seemed to be all stripes of black, gray and white with a random speck near the top. Doctor Thompson adjusted his glasses and drew in a slow, deep breath as if bracing himself for the worst. It took a few moments, like a strong drink swallowed too fast, burning on the way down until. . .he removed his glasses again and pinched the top of his nose with his eyes tightly squinted. The newspapers reprinted his comment.
"Perhaps the most powerful image of despair at the beginning of the twenty-first century is not found in art, or literature, or even popular music. It is found in a single photograph."
Next day, on page 7 of the New York Times, the world stared at the photograph. Reaction came immediately like the image in Edvard Munch’s painting, The Scream—an excruciating wail of anger, pain, and denial swept back upon the monsters who would publish such an image!
Official quote from the New York Medical Examiner’s office:
"A 'jumper' is somebody who goes to the office in the morning knowing that they will commit suicide. These people were forced out by the smoke and flames or blown out."
Only one man seemed driven to ask the questions nobody else dared to ask. In his curiosity and determination, he questioned the wrong people—showing them the terrible photograph. After all, he was guessing—and guessing means getting it wrong as easily as getting it right. If the unknown was too great a burden for him to bear, so too was it an unthinkable abomination—a blasphemy for the Hernandez family at their father’s funeral. It was a sin to commit suicide and it would send their beloved Norberto to the fires of hell! The daughter lashed out with her bitter words and sent reporter Peter Cheney back out into the street, stunned at the damage his questions had wrought.
The quest went forward. Another possibility arose: Jonathan Briley, as the falling object in the cursed picture, forever suspended upside down in mid-air, one improbable knee bent, as the slim healthy man plummeted at maximum velocity toward infinity below. Briley’s brother, Timothy identified him by his clothes and shoes, as well as a ridiculous orange undershirt barely visible as the white shirt ballooned out in the updraft of the awful fall—he remembered his brother wearing it that morning.
His grief-stricken sister told the reporter, "When I first looked at the picture ... and I saw it was a man—tall, slim—I said, 'If I didn't know any better, that could be Jonathan.”’
Approximately 200 people fell or jumped that day. None was deemed a “jumper,” but a victim of blunt force trauma in a murderous attack on the World Trade Center.
The Hernandez family was again contacted and their minds put at ease—not a minute too soon. Norberto’s daughters had been torn apart by embittered consciences stricken by devout Catholic teaching. At last, they could accept he had simply been one victim—a martyr to be sure—among the 2,996 which perished.
Of all the unspeakable horror of that day of infamy, the photograph—a portrait of a man falling—became the focal point of unacceptable remembrance.
None could or would accept the small measure of “choice” implied in this man’s demise. The only possible way the human mind could categorize the event was in terms of murder—not elective suicide.
Few persons could wrap their mind around the idea of “postponement” of the inevitable, in those few incredible minutes out in the open air—free of smoke and terrible flames—the illogical logic of not wanting to be incinerated in choking blackness and screams. . . Yet—it is so remarkably beautiful to come away with a powerful sense of defiance and freedom in that last act—refusal to accept a death chosen for them by brutal sadists on a feckless and twisted Jihad.
To jump and sail free in an impossible escape on the wings of God’s angels—or the simple purchase of five seconds more of precious life—who are we to judge this man or the 200 others and affix blame or assign moral verdicts?
In that moment of 9:41 a.m. September 11, 2001—there is an eternal portrait of a man falling. He who may have greater courage than any human has ever shown. 1,500 feet of flight on a most beautiful day with its morning sun bright and clear, and a casual breeze softly caressing his flight in a transcendent prayer of human dignity.
FREEDOM at any cost.
I have never understood the desire American's seem to have to label every person killed 'a hero'.
It's hard to imagine a more tragic situation than to be forced to jump to your death rather than be burned. But "greater courage than any human has ever shown" seems like a stretch.
He was a victim of a horrible crime, to try to make him a hero I believe lessons the role of the truly heroic - those who had a choice to stand back or to rush to the aid of others and while doing so, to lose their lives.
It makes an otherwise dead loss into an uplift--the American version of legend making.
Remember the end of The Man Who Shot Liberty Valence?
You're not going to use the story, Mr. Scott?
This is the west, sir. When the legend becomes fact, print the legend.
Is it a short story by Terry, or is it plagiarism of a documentary?
If I were charging money for it, you might have a point.
I have no reputation as a writer--so it can't be ruined very much :)
"If I were charging money for it, you might have a point."
That has nothing to do with it. You attributed it as a short story by you, when you took someone else's ideas and did not cite your source.
When an "injured party" shows up to complain, I'll discuss it with them.
"I have no reputation as a writer--so it can't be ruined very much" - TerryWalstrom
"The book is written in a clever and seasoned manner......." - Michael Bechard
"he gives us a concise narrative that is easy to read and understand....." - Classicgold
"Terry is a great writer....He writes in a very readable style..." - Ten Years After
"he writes with penetrating insight....." - Auntbee
"He writes in the tradition of Jack London........" - A. Ostling
Quotes all taken from the reviews of your book, I Wept by the Rivers of Babylon as posted on the Amazon.com website.
Apparently, you do have SOME reputation as a writer, whether you recognize it or not.