How much energy have religious 'nuts' (see what I did there?) wasted on getting all worked up about circumcision?
The foreskin is a normal part of the body but somehow has a bad reputation because it is associated with uncleanness.
If your parents thought it was a good idea to have your foreskin hacked off, I have some very sad news for you that you probably already know.
The most sexually sensitive part of the penis is on the foreskin, on the underside of the penis.
Like any other part of the body, if its functioning normally, why remove it?
Was the original idea behind circumcision really a health concern, as zealots continue to say, or was the real reason to deaden sexual sensitivity?