Senator's last rites to church tax breaks

by defender of truth 4 Replies latest social current

  • defender of truth
    defender of truth
    Senator's last rites to church tax breaks
    Getting rid of tax breaks for churches and axing the school chaplaincy program could save the federal budget $250 million a year.

    Liberal Democrats senator David Leyonhjelm says the government should consider the move, which he has had costed by the Parliamentary Budget Office, in this year's budget.

    "This Easter, the Liberal Democrats propose a $250 million annual boost to the budget by abolishing taxpayer support for religion," Senator Leyonhjelm told AAP on Thursday.

    The Christian church had made a "significant contribution to liberal democratic values" and had a right to impose religious tests for membership and employment, the senator said.

    "However, we do not consider it appropriate for taxpayers to pick up the tab for what is fundamentally a private matter."

    www.theaustralian.com.au/news/latest-news/senators-last-rites-to-church-tax-breaks/news-story/67c63a6a60761e52137452a2cfca94e5

    Here is some info about him:

    David Leyonhjelm Senator for New South Wales

    Running for the Australian Senate in New South Wales at the 2013 federal election, Leyonhjelm was elected to the fifth of six vacancies.

    In the first sitting week, he successfully moved to have the government's Clean Energy (Income Tax Rates and Other Amendments) Bill considered by itself, instead of being grouped with other legislation.

    In November 2014, Leyonhjelm introduced as a private member's bill a Freedom to Marry Bill, which would allow same-sex and other forms of non-heterosexual marriage.

    In August 2015 Leyonhjelm negotiated a deal to include a 12 month sunset clause on the temporary ban on importing the Adler lever action shotgun. The Government imposed the ban in July, while it reviewed the technical specifications of weapons in the wake of the Martin Place Siege.

    Along with seventeen other crossbenchers (including 10 Greens, independents and representatives from four other parties), the Liberal Democrats share the balance of power in the Senate.

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Leyonhjelm

    Even if this attempt at removing tax exemption doesn't go anywhere, there seems to be another attempt in the pipeline, and indications that many Australian citizens would be all for it:

    www.jehovahs-witness.com/topic/6313596845817856/loss-tax-exemption-australian-religious-organizations

    Any thoughts?

  • joe134cd
    joe134cd
    Persecution and the turning against religion in the time of the end
  • defender of truth
    defender of truth

    Deluded people can think it is persecution if they like.

    How likely is this to happen, politically speaking?

    The Australian budget is on May 3rd.

  • defender of truth
    defender of truth
    Strange, I would've thought some people would have found this interesting.
    Ah well, I will just leave you with these points:
    Religion is a part of people’s private lives, so why does the government allow tax breaks for it?

    ...we remain a largely secular country that at the same time is blessed with a multitude of different religious beliefs, or total indifference.

    What does confound a lot of people though, regardless of their subscription to any particular brand of God, is the legislated privilege and preference accorded to organised religion in this country.

    Religion is a part of people’s private lives that is totally optional, yet we enshrine it at a budgetary level...in tax breaks bestowed on everyone from the Catholics to the Jehovah’s Witnesses to the Church of Scientology, your local mosque and the multimillion-dollar money machines in the happy-clapper sector such as Hillsong.

    Churches don’t pay income or company tax as the rest of this country does. In most cases they are also exempt from state taxes and charges such as stamp duty, and exempt from local government rates.

    In effect, the revenues of the temples of the faithful are subsidised by everybody else on the basis that, according to government guidelines, the “advancement of religion” is deemed philanthropic as it is supposedly beneficial to the community.

    But seriously, in 21st century Australia, do we really need to be foregoing untold revenue to effectively subsidise evangelising and growing what in some cases are billion-dollar property and investment empires?
    www.couriermail.com.au/news/opinion/religion-in-australia-continues-to-benefit-from-tax-subsidies-despite-preaching-doctrines-that-contradict-modern-societal-norms/news-story/472a57734a806644f4e7292005ed3cdc

  • Vidiot
    Vidiot

    * gasp! *

    The Wild Beast is finally turning on Babylon the Great!

    And the churches who've been covering up child abuse are gonna get smacked fir...

    x

    ...oh.

    ( :wink: )

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit