September 3, 1996: The crown drops the charges of uttering threats, as there is no evidence to pursue the accusations. This is also the day that court reconvenes, and the wife is further cross-examined by the husband’s lawyer. It is evident from the recorded proceedings that the wife had lied under oath about a number of issues and that the crown no longer had a case against the husband. The charge of assault was then stayed. As a result of the husbands financial situation he could no longer afford to continue with this legal matter, thus he agreed to a peace bond. He was under the impression that with this peace bond that there would be a speedy resolution to the custody issues. And that he would be allowed contact with his children. He was told that the family court councilor would quickly work out the details for having access to his children.
sf, it appears to be some type of legal agreement due to his lack of $ that has nothing to do with a restraining order. ????