J.W. Receives Poly Heme

by Kenneson 7 Replies latest watchtower medical

  • Kenneson
    Kenneson

    The San Bernardino Sun has three related articles, written by Annette Wells, on a "blood substitute" called Poly Heme that was administered to a J.W. After reading this article, look to the right of the page and click on to the other two stories: "Church let's faithful opt for Poly Heme" and "For Witness faithful it's all in the blood."

    After reading the stories, it seems to me that Poly Heme is really recycled blood and I fail to see how it is a blood substitute.

    http://www.sbsun.com/Stories/0,1413,208%257E12588%257E1230929.00.html

  • Kenneson
    Kenneson

    Just open the home page.

    http://www.sbsun.com

  • Trauma_Hound
  • RunningMan
    RunningMan

    "The understanding is that each person stands before God and is judged according to his own conscience,' he said. "The other Witnesses would not criticize any decisions he makes.'"

    What bullshit.

  • UnDisfellowshipped
    UnDisfellowshipped

    http://www.sbsun.com/Stories/0,1413,208~12588~1230815,00.html

    Article Last Updated: Saturday, March 08, 2003 - 9:25:38 PM PST

    Church lets faithful opt for PolyHeme Blood substitute's use an individual's choice By ANNETTE WELLS, Staff Writer

    Webster's defines faith as a belief in the traditional doctrines of a religion.

    The rules of the Watch Tower which guides Jehovah's Witnesses forbid members to consume their own or others' blood.

    This religious conviction, based on three passages from the Bible, applies to whole blood, packed red blood cells, white blood cells, plasma and platelets, said L.C. Cotton, associate director of Jehovah's Witnesses hospital information services.

    "We feel that the Bible clearly indicates that blood is sacred and it is not to be used for human consumption,' he said. "Though it doesn't discuss it in medical terms, Jehovah's Witnesses feel that would preclude the acceptance of it in a blood transfusion.'

    Violation could lead to loss of eternal life, the Watch Tower suggests.

    "We're not anti-life,' said Jose Urbina of Pasadena, whose father, a Rialto resident also named Jose, and other family members have undergone surgery without the use of blood.

    "As Jehovah's Witnesses, we love life, the former San Bernardino resident said. "But the issue of blood is a major thing that we have to adhere to.'

    The younger Urbina continued, "We don't want to violate Jehovah.'

    However, in January, Urbina's father became one of two patients in Orange County who have received the chemically modified hemoglobin, PolyHeme.

    Though it is not whole blood, it is derived from it.

    The question now is it still blood?

    Cotton could not answer that question but said individuals must decide whether to accept the product.

    "When blood is fractionated beyond those primary components and other blood derivatives, we feel that it is an individual decision,' he said. "If an individual's conscience will allow him to accept the product, then that would be up to that individual. That is between himself and his God.'

    As far as other Jehovah's Witnesses possibly ostracizing those who do accept hemoglobin substitutes, Cotton said it would never happen.

    "The understanding is that each person stands before God and is judged according to his own conscience,' he said. "The other Witnesses would not criticize any decisions he makes.'

    _____________________________________________________________

    http://www.sbsun.com/Stories/0,1413,208~12588~1230929,00.html

    Article Last Updated: Saturday, March 08, 2003 - 9:48:41 PM PST

    Blood substitute is surgical solution for church member Doctors use alternative on Rialto Jehovah's Witness By ANNETTE WELLS, Staff Writer

    Steven Lewis
    Jose Luis Urbina listens to his daughter Ruth from a hospital bed on Friday in Santa Ana. Urbina, a Jehovah’s Witness, was bleeding internaly and near death recently but his faith prevented him from accepting a blood transfusion. His family located a hospital in Orange County where a bloodless surgery was performed.

    RIALTO - Blood is sacred.

    Blood should not be eaten, and if removed from the body should be disposed of, not reused or given to someone else.

    That's the belief of Jose Urbina and other Jehovah's Witnesses.

    In January, the 56-year-old Rialto man's beliefs were tested as he nearly died because of gastrointestinal bleeding. The man's hemoglobin had dropped below critical levels, doctors said.

    Surgery to locate and treat the bleeding likely would have required a blood transfusion.

    Unable to breathe on his own, Urbina was at a crossroads.

    To his right, religion. Faith. A wife and three children.

    To his left, Urbina's physician at Community Hospital of San Bernardino. His life.

    "I told them no blood,' he said, speaking Spanish through a translator at Fountain Valley Regional Medical Center, where was transferred for a special procdure. "They knew why.'

    As a result, Urbina became one of two patients in Orange County to receive the chemically modified hemoglobin, PolyHeme.

    PolyHeme, developed by Evanston, Ill.-based Northfield Laboratories Inc., is basically recycled blood.

    Though used on a case-by-case basis depending on emergency need, PolyHeme has not been approved by the federal Food and Drug Administration, said Jason Shane, manager of Fountain Valley Regional Medical Center's Bloodless Medicine and Surgery Program.

    The program was started about 20 years ago as an alternative approach to treating patients who refused blood products. Most of the program's patients are Jehovah's Witnesses, Shane said. The others fear blood transfusions because of the potential risk of acquiring a disease from a donor.

    "The FDA knows about PolyHeme. It is currently in Phase III, the final phase, of testing,' Shane said. "But it is being used all over the country and world.'

    Dr. Vinod Melhotra, medical director of bloodless medical programs at Fountain Valley Regional Medical Center, said that before Urbina came to the Fountain Valley hospital, he was given NovoSeven, a new drug with the capability of stopping internal bleeding.

    "We needed to get the bleeding to stop or his hemoglobin levels would have dropped till he died,' Melhotra said. "Without a blood transfusion and no ability to make it, your brain cannot function.'

    Hemoglobin is the oxygen-carrying component of red blood cells.

    When Urbina got to Fountain Valley on Jan. 14, his hemoglobin level had dropped below 3. A level of 14 is considered normal, Melhotra said.

    "That's near fatal,' Shane said. "By this time, it is so low, you can't do surgery. And because he (was) anemic, he was not getting enough oxygen and had to be placed on a breathing machine.'

    Melhotra said, "We did not think he was going to make it.'

    PolyHeme was the only solution.

    What is PolyHeme?

    Northfield Laboratories began developing the product in 1985, said Dr. Steven Gould, the company's chief executive officer.

    To produce PolyHeme, researchers separate, filter and chemically modify blood purchased from the American Red Cross and Blood Centers of America.

    First, hemoglobin is separated from red blood cells and is filtered to remove impurities. The purified hemoglobin is then chemically modified using a multi-step process to create a polymerized form of hemoglobin.

    The modified hemoglobin is mixed into a solution and given to the patient as it would be done during a blood transfusion.

    "It looks like blood,' Melhotra said. "It comes in a plastic bag and is pre-mixed. It doesn't have any cells, and because the body doesn't react to it, it can be given to all blood types.'

    One unit of PolyHeme contains 50 grams of modified hemoglobin or the same amount of hemoglobin delivered by one unit of transfused blood.

    "We are in late-stage product development now,' Gould said. "We have data most of it has been published showing the life sustainability of our product. This data is based on cases where a person has virtually lost all of their own blood and was given our product.'

    Who qualifies

    Because PolyHeme has not received FDA approval, and it is only used as a substitute for blood in extreme acute blood-loss situations, obtaining it is a tedious task, Melhotra said.

    "Prior to product approval we have to comply with all FDA's laws,' Gould said. "We have to get authorization to use it on a case-by-case basis. If the FDA approves the individual use, it is because the individual is in a life-threatening situation.'

    In Urbina's case, a "compassionate use' approval was given because of his perilous condition and his inability to breathe on his own, Shane said.

    Urbina's approval though, took about 48 hours. "It's a great deal of work, but obviously it's worth it,' Gould said.

    After receiving approval from both Northfield and the FDA, 12 units of PolyHeme were delivered to Fountain Valley Regional for Urbina.

    He was given five units over three days.

    His hemoglobin levels gradually built back up to 10 within those days, and Urbina was weaned off PolyHeme.

    Urbina's family members said they were glad someone knew about their options.

    "They have a reputation for treating Jehovah's Witnesses with alternative blood products,' Urbina's son, also known as Jose, said about Fountain Valley Regional.

    "I have nothing but respect for the people here and the respect they had for our father's beliefs,' he said. "From the time he was in San Bernardino until he got here, my father did a complete 180.'

    Melhotra said Urbina was given other medication such as a bone marrow stimulant and folic acid.

    About two weeks later, he was transferred to a Santa Ana rehabilitation center to recover.

    "PolyHeme saved his life,' Melhotra said.

    Benefits

    So far, PolyHeme has only been used twice at Fountain Valley Regional, Melhotra said.

    Before Urbina, a man had arrived at the hospital with advanced leukemia and received the solution. But the man's illness was too far advanced and he died, Melhotra said.

    "PolyHeme provides a tremendous boon to patients during traumatic situations where they need blood in a hurry,' Melhotra said. "Especially when there isn't that much blood available today.'

    The one major benefit of it is that it eliminates disease transmission.

    Diseases such as AIDS and hepatitis are known to have been transmitted through blood transfusions, Shane said.

    Another benefit of PolyHeme is that it has universal compatibility. It doesn't require blood typing so it can be used immediately.

    "You don't have to cross type it,' Melhotra said. "You don't have to be part of any particular blood group to receive it.'

    PolyHeme also has an extended shelf life.

    Northfield Laboratories Inc. estimates that PolyHeme has a shelf life of about one year if refrigerated. Human blood has a shelf life of about 42 days, health officials say.

    Dr. Arthur Silvergleid, medical director and chief executive officer of the Blood Bank of San Bernardino and Riverside Counties, said hemoglobin substitutes will not likely replace blood transfusions.

    He said there are a selected group of professions, such as the military, that could benefit from the products.

    "If we are in a combat situation, and soldiers have lost blood and need it quickly, hemoglobin substitutes would be helpful,' Silvergleid said. "But we're not concerned about going out of business.'

    Silvergleid said hemoglobin substitutes were looked at in the mid 1970s, and at the time, researchers said they were just a "few years away.'

    "On paper they do fine,' he said, "but they haven't completely been able to satisfy everyone.'

    ___________________________________________________________

    http://www.sbsun.com/Stories/0,1413,208~12588~1230873,00.html

    For Witness faithful, it's all in the blood Many physicians seek to accommodate their patients' beliefs By ANNETTE WELLS, Staff Writer

    Physicians face a unique challenge when treating Jehovah's Witnesses.

    Members of the denomination an estimated 2 million in the United States do not accept blood, and are reluctant to undergo any organ transplants requiring blood transfusion.

    According to information on the Web site for the faith ( http://www.watchtower.org/ , their religious convictions are based on the belief that all of a person's traits, including impulses to commit a crime, are contained in blood.

    If that's the case, what are hospitals left to do?

    L.C. Cotton, associate director of hospital information services for Jehovah's Witnesses, said physicians across the world, and especially here in the United States, have made efforts to accommodate their beliefs.

    In this country, there are more than 82 bloodless medicine and surgery centers and more than 30,000 physicians capable of treating patients without the use of blood products, Cotton said.

    In the world, there are more than 100,000 physicians, he said.

    "I think at one point, there was a time when doctors were more paternalistic in their view,' he said. "It was more of, 'I will tell you what you need and you don't question me.'

    "Today, more doctors want the patient to have a say in what is done to his body. The patient has a right to bodily self-determination.'

    Dr. Julius Ibanez, medical director of the emergency room department at Community Hospital of San Bernardino, and Dr. James Killeen, vice chairman of the department of surgery at Loma Linda University Medical Center, say blood isn't always needed.

    "There are very few surgical procedures where 100 percent of the time you need a blood transfusion,' Killeen said. "If somebody wanted a liver transplant without blood, that could be done.'

    In fact, in the last 20 years, a number of products have been developed for physicians to treat patients who refuse blood.

    Those products include fluids that can be used to maintain blood volume, drugs that can stimulate the production of red blood cells, blood salvaging machines and pads that can stop bleeding.

    During blood loss, a patient's blood pressure drops and the heart rate goes up, Ibanez said.

    When this occurs, and the patient refuses a blood transfusion, he or she can be given saline solutions or plasma volume expanders to replace the fluid that has been lost in arteries and veins.

    "Saline solutions and volume expanders also keep the patient's blood pressure down,' Ibanez said. "However, they are not replacements for blood.'

    Ibanez said that Community Hospital does not offer hemoglobin substitutes such as PolyHeme or Hemopure. PolyHeme, which is manufactured by Evanston,Ill.-based Northfield Laboratories Inc., is modified hemoglobin.

    Manufactured by Cambridge, Mass.-based Biopure Corp., Hemopure is purified oxygen-carrying hemoglobin solution made from cow blood.

    In addition, surgeons have tools, and the capability of performing procedures without the use of blood products, said Shane Jason, manager of the Bloodless Medicine and Surgery Program at Fountain Valley Regional Medical Center.

    "Even blood tests, which usually require a certain amount of blood, can be done with very small amounts here,' he said. "Instead of one full vile, we only need two or three drops.'

    Started in the early 1980s, Fountain Valley Regional's bloodless program is one of the oldest in the country, he said.

    "Back then, people kind of looked at us like, 'Are you nuts?' Now there are more than 200 similar programs across the country,' he said.

    Dr. Vinod Melhotra, director of the bloodless program at Fountain Valley Regional, said about 95 percent of the patients receiving treatment there are Jehovah's Witnesses.

    The other 5 percent fear disease transmittal.

    "Unless they are in dire need of surgery, we wait,' Melhotra said. "If a patient is anemic, then we would postpone surgery so that they can build up their blood count.'

    Though Loma Linda University Medical Center doesn't have a bloodless program, Killeen said surgeons there likely wouldn't have a conflict if a patient wanted such a procedure.

    However, the decision to perform the procedure would be dependent upon the degree of the medical problem, he said.

    "If the job entailed a very complicated procedure, some surgeons might not be too comfortable, especially if they had a feeling the patient would not survive,' he said.

    Ibanez said the idea is to know things in advance so that appropriate measures can be taken.

    "The first thing we do is try to identity if a patient is a Jehovah's Witness,' he said. "That way, if the patient needs blood, we know that we can not give it to them.'

    If the patient's condition is too serious for bloodless products, then there is a little bit of pleading done, he said.

    "We explain the gravity and severity of their disease and we plead with them to make an exception in this case which is very, very rare,' Ibanez said.

    "Secondly, we do as much as we can with what we have.'

  • Jourles
    Jourles
    "When blood is fractionated beyond those primary components and other blood derivatives, we feel that it is an individual decision,' he said. "If an individual's conscience will allow him to accept the product, then that would be up to that individual. That is between himself and his God.'

    As far as other Jehovah's Witnesses possibly ostracizing those who do accept hemoglobin substitutes, Cotton said it would never happen.

    "The understanding is that each person stands before God and is judged according to his own conscience,' he said. "The other Witnesses would not criticize any decisions he makes.'

    Damn it, I want to read this in the Watchtower. I am speaking with someone in my family right now that refuses to believe that hemoglobin based substitutes are acceptable. They keep insisting that apostates are planting these quotes and that the HLS has nothing to do with it.

    Also, does the HLS step in for unbaptized witnesses? For example, from the Sacramento Bee article from a couple years back there was an unbaptized bro that took Hemopure and it was supposedly authorized by the HLS. This same relative of mine also insists that the HLS NEVER steps in and assists unbaptized witnesses. Does anyone know if this is true or not? Oh, and that SacBee article...apostates planted that too to make the witnesses look wishy-washy, according to my relative.

  • blondie
    blondie

    Jourles, I would ask my relative what would be acceptable proof of the points I am making. Make them commit to something definite. Otherwise, no matter what you bring them, they will undercut the validity. This sounds like people I have encountered who believe the earth is flat or than it is a hoax that men landed on the moon. This might be a pearls before swine situation.

    Blondie (hope to meet in Green Bay)

  • UnDisfellowshipped
    UnDisfellowshipped

    Jourles said:

    Damn it, I want to read this in the Watchtower. I am speaking with someone in my family right now that refuses to believe that hemoglobin based substitutes are acceptable. They keep insisting that apostates are planting these quotes and that the HLS has nothing to do with it.

    I know what you mean. However, it would be very hard for them to refute the Quotes below, which are taken directly from the Society's Publications.

    I need to explain and clarify a few things first -- this can get confusing.

    For the last 50+ years, it appears that there have two conflicting and contradictory teachings about Blood Transfusions being taught in the Watchtower's Publications -- and this is still going on. (the same thing has been going on with the Rape/Screaming Policy and the Alternative Military Service Policy)

    Here are the two conflicting teachings about Blood Transfusions:

    1: I call this the "Blood Storing Rule": Jehovah's Witnesses are not supposed to use ANY blood for ANY "useful purpose" after it has been taken out of the body, and if you do, you would break Jehovah's Law on blood. Jehovah's Witnesses must not use ANY fraction of blood which is taken from blood that has been stored. If blood is removed from a body, the blood must be disposed of -- it cannot be used for any "useful purpose." Jehovah's Witnesses cannot even store their own blood to use later! This also means that Jehovah's Witnesses cannot receive Vaccinations which contain blood fractions. The Scriptural reasons given for this are found only in the Old Testament Mosaic Law Covenant, which Christians are NOT under, but apparently Jehovah's Witnesses are under certain parts of the Mosaic Law (Leviticus 17:13; Deuteronomy 12:24; Deuteronomy 15:23)

    2: I call this the "Blood Nourishing the Body Rule": Jehovah's Witnesses must not accept whole blood, red blood cells, white blood cells, platelets, or plasma (serum) [which are the so-called "Major Fractions" or "Major Components" of Blood, as determined by the Watchtower Leaders]. Jehovah's Witnesses can accept any other type of blood [which is called "Minor Fractions" by the Watchtower Leaders], IF it is not "nourishing the body". There is absolutely no Scriptural basis for this reasoning of accepting one type of fraction and calling it "Minor", but then forbidding other types of fractions and calling them "Major".

    Now, for the latest information in the Publications -- Which "Rule" is the Society currently teaching?

    First, in the "Questions From Readers" in the June 15th 2000 Issue of the Watchtower, it was declared that the "Blood Nourishing the Body Rule" was now in effect:

    The Watchtower, June 15th 2000 Issue, Pages 29-31:

    Questions From Readers

    Do Jehovah’s Witnesses accept any medical products derived from blood?

    The fundamental answer is that Jehovah’s Witnesses do not accept blood. We firmly believe that God’s law on blood is not open to reform to fit shifting opinions. Still, new issues arise because blood can now be processed into four primary components and fractions of those components. In deciding whether to accept such, a Christian should look beyond possible medical benefits and risks. His concern should be what the Bible says and the potential effect on his relationship with Almighty God.

    The key issues are quite simple. As an aid to seeing why that is so, consider some Biblical, historical, and medical background.

    Jehovah God told our common ancestor Noah that blood must be treated as something special. (Genesis 9:3, 4) Later, God’s laws to Israel reflected the sacredness of blood: “As for any man of the house of Israel or some alien resident . . . who eats any sort of blood, I shall certainly set my face against the soul that is eating the blood.” By rejecting God’s law, an Israelite could contaminate others; thus, God added: “I shall indeed cut him off from among his people.” (Leviticus 17:10) Later, at a meeting in Jerusalem, the apostles and older men decreed that we must ‘abstain from blood.’ Doing so is as vital as abstaining from sexual immorality and idolatry.—Acts 15:28, 29.

    What would “abstaining” have meant back then? Christians did not consume blood, whether fresh or coagulated; nor did they eat meat from an unbled animal. Also ruled out would be foods to which blood was added, such as blood sausage. Taking in blood in any of those ways would violate God’s law.—1 Samuel 14:32, 33.

    Most people in ancient times would not have been troubled over the consuming of blood, as we can see from the writings of Tertullian (second and third centuries C.E.). Responding to false charges that Christians consumed blood, Tertullian mentioned tribes that sealed treaties by tasting blood. He also noted that “when a show is given in the arena, [some] with greedy thirst have caught the fresh blood of the guilty . . . as a cure for their epilepsy.”

    Those practices (even if some Romans did them for health reasons) were wrong for Christians: “We do not include even animals’ blood in our natural diet,” wrote Tertullian. The Romans used food containing blood as a test of the integrity of real Christians. Tertullian added: “Now, I ask you, what sort of a thing is it, that when you are confident [that Christians] will turn with horror from animals’ blood, you should suppose them greedy for human blood?”

    Today, few people would think that the laws of Almighty God are at issue if a physician suggested their taking blood. While Jehovah’s Witnesses certainly want to keep living, we are committed to obey Jehovah’s law on blood. What does this mean in the light of current medical practice?

    As transfusions of whole blood became common after World War II, Jehovah’s Witnesses saw that this was contrary to God’s law—and we still believe that. Yet, medicine has changed over time. Today, most transfusions are not of whole blood but of one of its primary components: (1) red cells; (2) white cells; (3) platelets; (4) plasma (serum), the fluid part. Depending on the condition of the patient, physicians might prescribe red cells, white cells, platelets, or plasma. Transfusing these major components allows a single unit of blood to be divided among more patients. Jehovah’s Witnesses hold that accepting whole blood or any of those four primary components violates God’s law. Significantly, keeping to this Bible-based position has protected them from many risks, including such diseases as hepatitis and AIDS that can be contracted from blood.

    However, since blood can be processed beyond those primary components, questions arise about fractions derived from the primary blood components. How are such fractions used, and what should a Christian consider when deciding on them?

    Blood is complex. Even the plasma—which is 90 percent water—carries scores of hormones, inorganic salts, enzymes, and nutrients, including minerals and sugar. Plasma also carries such proteins as albumin, clotting factors, and antibodies to fight diseases. Technicians isolate and use many plasma proteins. For example, clotting factor VIII has been given to hemophiliacs, who bleed easily. Or if someone is exposed to certain diseases, doctors might prescribe injections of gamma globulin, extracted from the blood plasma of people who already had immunity. Other plasma proteins are used medically, but the above mentioned illustrate how a primary blood component (plasma) may be processed to obtain fractions.* [FOOTNOTE SAYS: See “Questions From Readers” in The Watchtower of June 15, 1978, and October 1, 1994. Pharmaceutical firms have developed recombinant products that are not taken from blood and that may be prescribed in place of some blood fractions used in the past.]

    Just as blood plasma can be a source of various fractions, the other primary components (red cells, white cells, platelets) can be processed to isolate smaller parts. For example, white blood cells may be a source of interferons and interleukins, used to treat some viral infections and cancers. Platelets can be processed to extract a wound-healing factor. And other medicines are coming along that involve (at least initially) extracts from blood components. Such therapies are not transfusions of those primary components; they usually involve parts or fractions thereof. Should Christians accept these fractions in medical treatment? We cannot say. The Bible does not give details, so a Christian must make his own conscientious decision before God.

    Some would refuse anything derived from blood (even fractions intended to provide temporary passive immunity). That is how they understand God’s command to ‘abstain from blood.’ They reason that his law to Israel required that blood removed from a creature be ‘poured out on the ground.’ (Deuteronomy 12:22-24) Why is that relevant? Well, to prepare gamma globulin, blood-based clotting factors, and so on, requires that blood be collected and processed. Hence, some Christians reject such products, just as they reject transfusions of whole blood or of its four primary components. Their sincere, conscientious stand should be respected.

    Other Christians decide differently. They too refuse transfusions of whole blood, red cells, white cells, platelets, or plasma. Yet, they might allow a physician to treat them with a fraction extracted from the primary components. Even here there may be differences. One Christian may accept a gamma globulin injection, but he may or may not agree to an injection containing something extracted from red or white cells. Overall, though, what might lead some Christians to conclude that they could accept blood fractions?

    “Questions From Readers” in The Watchtower of June 1, 1990, noted that plasma proteins (fractions) move from a pregnant woman’s blood to the separate blood system of her fetus. Thus a mother passes immunoglobulins to her child, providing valuable immunity. Separately, as a fetus’ red cells complete their normal life span, their oxygen-carrying portion is processed. Some of it becomes bilirubin, which crosses the placenta to the mother and is eliminated with her body wastes. Some Christians may conclude that since blood fractions can pass to another person in this natural setting, they could accept a blood fraction derived from blood plasma or cells.

    Does the fact that opinions and conscientious decisions may differ mean that the issue is inconsequential? No. It is serious. Yet, there is a basic simplicity. The above material shows that Jehovah’s Witnesses refuse transfusions of both whole blood and its primary blood components. The Bible directs Christians to ‘abstain from things sacrificed to idols and from blood and from fornication.’ (Acts 15:29) Beyond that, when it comes to fractions of any of the primary components, each Christian, after careful and prayerful meditation, must conscientiously decide for himself.

    Many people would be willing to accept any therapy that seems to offer immediate benefit, even a therapy having known health risks, as is true of blood products. The sincere Christian endeavors to have a broader, more balanced view that involves more than just the physical aspects. Jehovah’s Witnesses appreciate efforts to provide quality medical care, and they weigh the risk/benefit ratio of any treatment. However, when it comes to products derived from blood, they carefully weigh what God says and their personal relationship with our Life-Giver.—Psalm 36:9.

    What a blessing for a Christian to have such confidence as the psalmist who wrote: “Jehovah God is a sun and a shield; favor and glory are what he gives. Jehovah himself will not hold back anything good from those walking in faultlessness. O Jehovah . . . , happy is the man that is trusting in you”!—Psalm 84:11, 12.

    [Box on page 30]

    SUGGESTED QUESTIONS FOR THE DOCTOR

    If you face surgery or a treatment that might involve a blood product, ask:

    Do all the medical personnel involved know that, as one of Jehovah’s Witnesses, I direct that no blood transfusions (whole blood, red cells, white cells, platelets, or blood plasma) be given to me under any circumstances?

    If any medicine to be prescribed may be made from blood plasma, red or white cells, or platelets, ask:

    Has the medicine been made from one of the four primary blood components? If so, would you explain its makeup?

    How much of this blood-derived medicine might be administered, and in what way?

    If my conscience permits me to accept this fraction, what medical risks are there?

    If my conscience moves me to decline this fraction, what other therapy might be used?

    After I have considered this matter further, when may I inform you of my decision?___________________________________________

    Then, however, in the "Questions From Readers" in the October 15th 2000 Issue of the Watchtower (a mere 4 months later), it was declared that the "Storing Blood Rule" was now in effect:

    The Watchtower, October 15th 2000 Issue, Pages 30-31:

    Questions From Readers

    In the light of Bible commands about the proper use of blood, how do Jehovah’s Witnesses view medical procedures using one’s own blood?

    Rather than deciding solely on the basis of personal preference or some medical recommendation, each Christian ought to consider seriously what the Bible says. It is a matter between him and Jehovah.

    Jehovah, to whom we owe our lives, decreed that blood should not be consumed. (Genesis 9:3, 4) In the Law for ancient Israel, God limited the use of blood because it represents life. He decreed: “The soul [or life] of the flesh is in the blood, and I myself have put it upon the altar for you to make atonement for your souls.” What if a man killed an animal for food? God said: “He must in that case pour its blood out and cover it with dust.”* [FOOTNOTE SAYS: Professor Frank H. Gorman writes: “The pouring out of the blood is best understood as an act of reverence that demonstrates respect for the life of the animal and, thus, respect for God, who created and continues to care for that life.”] (Leviticus 17:11, 13) Jehovah repeated this command again and again. (Deuteronomy 12:16, 24; 15:23) The Jewish Soncino Chumash notes: “The blood must not be stored but rendered unfit for consumption by pouring it on the ground.” No Israelite was to appropriate, store, and use the blood of another creature, whose life belonged to God.

    The obligation to keep the Mosaic Law ended when the Messiah died. Yet, God’s view of the sacredness of blood remains. Moved by God’s holy spirit, the apostles directed Christians to ‘abstain from blood.’ That command was not to be taken lightly. It was as important morally as abstaining from sexual immorality or idolatry. (Acts 15:28, 29; 21:25) When donating and transfusing blood became common in the 20th century, Jehovah’s Witnesses understood that this practice conflicted with God’s Word.* [FOOTNOTE SAYS: The Watchtower of July 1, 1951, answered key questions about this subject, showing why transfusions of donated blood are not appropriate.]

    Occasionally, a doctor will urge a patient to deposit his own blood weeks before surgery (preoperative autologous blood donation, or PAD) so that if the need arises, he could transfuse the patient with his own stored blood. However, such collecting, storing, and transfusing of blood directly contradicts what is said in Leviticus and Deuteronomy. Blood is not to be stored; it is to be poured out—returned to God, as it were. Granted, the Mosaic Law is not in force now. Nevertheless, Jehovah’s Witnesses respect the principles God included in it, and they are determined to ‘abstain from blood.’ Hence, we do not donate blood, nor do we store for transfusion our blood that should be ‘poured out.’ That practice conflicts with God’s law.

    Other procedures or tests involving an individual’s own blood are not so clearly in conflict with God’s stated principles. For instance, many Christians have allowed some of their blood to be withdrawn for testing or analysis, after which the sample is discarded. Other more complex procedures involving one’s blood may also be recommended.

    For example, during certain surgical procedures, some blood may be diverted from the body in a process called hemodilution. The blood remaining in the patient is diluted. Later, his blood in the external circuit is directed back into him, thus bringing his blood count closer to normal. Similarly, blood that flows into a wound may be captured and filtered so that the red cells can be returned to the patient; this is called cell salvage. In a different process, blood may be directed to a machine that temporarily carries on a function normally handled by body organs (for example, the heart, lungs, or kidneys). The blood from the machine is then returned to the patient. In other procedures, blood is diverted to a separator (centrifuge) so that damaging or defective portions of it can be eliminated. Or the goal may be to isolate some of a blood component and apply that elsewhere on the body. There are also tests in which a quantity of blood is withdrawn in order to tag it or to mix it with medicine, whereupon it is put back into the patient.

    The details may vary, and new procedures, treatments, and tests will certainly be developed. It is not our place to analyze each variation and render a decision. A Christian must decide for himself how his own blood will be handled in the course of a surgical procedure, medical test, or current therapy. Ahead of time, he should obtain from the doctor or technician the facts about what might be done with his blood during the procedure. Then he must decide according to what his conscience permits. (See box.)

    Christians should bear in mind their dedication to God and obligation ‘to love him with their whole heart, whole soul, whole strength, and whole mind.’ (Luke 10:27) Unlike most in the world, Jehovah’s Witnesses highly treasure their good relationship with God. The Life-Giver urges all to trust in Jesus’ shed blood. We read: “By means of him [Jesus Christ] we have the release by ransom through the blood of that one, yes, the forgiveness of our trespasses.”—Ephesians 1:7.

    [Box/Pictures on page 31]

    QUESTIONS TO ASK YOURSELF

    If some of my blood will be diverted outside my body and the flow might even be interrupted for a time, will my conscience allow me to view this blood as still part of me, thus not requiring that it be ‘poured out on the ground’?

    Would my Bible-trained conscience be troubled if during a diagnostic or therapeutic procedure some of my own blood was withdrawn, modified, and directed back into (or onto) my body?

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit