Ever changing teachings of Jehovah's Witnesses

by Vanderhoven7 9 Replies latest watchtower bible

  • Vanderhoven7

    Some might be interested in this comprehensive list of changes and reversals in the channel of truth.

    Reading History:

    Ever-changing teachings of Jehovah's Witnesses. The most important changes in the doctrine of the Watchtower Society in the years 1879-2015
    Paper Thumbnail


    Couldn’t open it w/o an account

    anyone else?

  • JW GoneBad
    JW GoneBad

    Same...link didn't work!

  • peacefulpete

    Too long to copy and paste. You just need to create an account. It's free and the website is a good resource for research.

  • JW GoneBad
    JW GoneBad

    Speaking of changes...any chance that the GB will reverse its 'New Light' on beards? Some day soon saying something to the effect: "The matter of brothers being allowed to wear beards has served its purpose yada, yada, yada!"

    There's been countless changes on Sodom and Gomorrah over the years as to whether the inhabitants would be resurrected. The 2023 AGM again made a change saying something to the effect: "We dunno...we can't be dogmatic on the matter of Sodom and Gomorrah"!

    There's been countless changes over the years to the generation understanding of Matthew 24:34...last I checked somewhere between 6 to 8 adjustments...and a ton of changes over the years on a ton of other Bible topics!

    Any thoughts on future GB modification on beards...inquiring minds want to know!

  • JW GoneBad
    JW GoneBad

    Here's a link to alot of WTBTS changes & adjustments over the years from jwfacts.com:


  • Atlantis
  • Vanderhoven7

    Thanks Atlantis!

  • Varuaino

    Thanks Atlantis ! 😁

    What do you foresee about beards JW GoneBad?

  • NotFormer

    They'll never rescind the beard ruling, no matter how hairsute the congregation becomes.

    The most ridiculous thing about it is of how much of an issue it was and how it's change was shouted from the housetops like it was important. For Pete's sake, GB, it is just a few hairs sticking out of someone's face! They should never have had any sort of rigid policy on it in the first place.

Share this