The "Rev" hates my book!!!!

by morrisamb 8 Replies latest watchtower child-abuse

  • morrisamb

    Does anyone know this The Rev? I think he's posted on before and I had a disagreement with him. I think he and my father would get along. Check out the line I've bolded!!!

    Love to get your opinions...Thanks, Donald

    Home Subscribe Index Archives
    The Book Barn

    Reviewed by: The Rev27th Sep 2002

    Father's Touch

    Donald D'Haene

    Purchase this book at B&N

    The list of positive reviews, blurbs, etc. for this book is far-reaching and astounding. And if these people are to be trusted, then it makes me wonder whether a single one of them has ever read a book before.

    Before getting to the many stylistic problems with it, there are two major issues of subject matter that need to be mentioned. First and foremost, by the end of Chapter 2, D'Haene has already cut himself off at the knee. Starting there, and throughout the book, he makes reference to his being sexually abused by his father and says, many times, that he enjoyed what was happening. He then turns around, sometimes in the same sentence, and goes on the attack. There is no middle ground, no area where we understand the link between point A and point B; either the author himself is too confused to draw the map for us, or he thinks we'll understand how to get there without one. In either case, that one problem with the book is already enough that any major publisher would have sent it back requesting extensive revision.

    Secondly, D'Haene falls into the politically correct trap of equating sexual abuse and rape, two entirely different things. This is a dangerous grey area both legally and politically in today's climate, and it is, to say the least, a sign of extreme irresponsibility on the parts of both author and publisher that D'Haene refers to acts of sexual assault as rapes. Someone should have caught it and sent it back requesting revisions. Again.

    Those aside, if the book had been well-written otherwise, it might perhaps have had the skeleton of something worth saving in a second edition. This is not the case. D'Haene's testimony (for calling it a book is something of a stretch, save that it is bound and sold) is written like a children's book in that the chapters vary widely in length, but not for emphatic purposes as much as simply running out of steam in certain narrative flows. Also, tenses shift without warning, leading the reader to confusion at times. Plot points of interest, including a major one early on in the book, are picked up and then left to die. The style of the book is less that of autobiography than it is unedited journal; at times, D'Haene will rattle off half a dozen questions at himself without ever answering them, or let a flood of emotions pour out, exclamation points included, without going back and revising into some readable state later.

    Perhaps in other hands, this could have become a compelling memoir; as it stands now, it's pretty much unreadable.

  • Big Tex
    Big Tex


    Okay, if sexual abuse is not rape, then what is it? Is this bozo a member of NAMBLA? What an idiot!

  • UnDisfellowshipped

    Edited by - UnDisfellowshipped on 22 October 2002 5:42:30

  • Kenneson

    Donald, I wouldn't lose any sleep over this "critique."

  • Brummie


    , D'Haene falls into the politically correct trap of equating sexual abuse and rape, two entirely different things.

    Since when did vile crimes such as this become an issue of political correctness? Talk about missing the point! ...when did rape stop being a matter of sexual abuse? I'd like to cross examine this twit in court, and he has the nerve of accusing you of raising yet not answering questions

    Thank God he is only a raving looney Rev and not one that sits in the courts judging these perverts.



    Kenneson: Donald, I wouldn't lose any sleep over this "critique."

  • Witch Child
    Witch Child

    this rev guy is so full of himself... what a pompous, over-inflated windbag!

    "calling it a book is a stretcfh.." He is just the type of insequre,microcephallic twerp that has to tear down others to feel good about himself. Don't you take a single word of his to heart. What an arrogant wanker!

    grumble, grumble!


  • morrisamb

    Thanks for the feedback..what makes this more absurd is I describe an actual incident of rape in my book. If he indeed has read my book, he's one sicko, let me tell you!

    Here is a letter I received from someone who HAS read my book and The Rev's Review this morning... wow, such venom. I was interested in his conviction that children who are sexually abused never enjoy the feelings that go along with the abuse. Very black and white. His belief that, you are abused only if you hate what is happening to you. When children are so young and an adult tells them this is good, pays attention to them, how are they able to discern that what is occurring is harmful or not right. He obviously has very little understanding of the mind of a child. Whoa!!! Lesleigh

    Edited by - morrisamb on 22 October 2002 9:46:43


    IF THE "REV" hates your book no tellin what his opinion of mine wil be when I finally write mine! QUEENIE ((HUGS))

  • morrisamb

    Another response to the "REV" Hi Donald, the Rev is an asshole! He's the only one who's riding the horse in the opposite direction. I can't stand some of these "Christians". Being a Christian asshole still leaves him to be an asshole! What an asshole!

Share this