Not sure how to interpret this...anyone else?

by ron rawson 3 Replies latest watchtower child-abuse

  • ron rawson
    ron rawson
    the following transaction has occurred in:
    CONTI v. WATCHTOWER BIBLE & TRACT SOCIETY OF NEW YORK
    Case: S226656, Supreme Court of California

    Date (YYYY-MM-DD): 2015-07-08
    Event Description: Petition ordered withdrawn


    For more information on this case, go to:
    http://appellatecases.courtinfo.ca.gov/search/case/disposition.cfm?dist=0&doc_id=2109889&doc_no=S226656

    For opinions, go to:
    http://www.courts.ca.gov/opinions-slip.htm

    Do not reply to this e-mail. Messages sent to this e-mail address will not be processed.
  • tim3l0rd
    tim3l0rd
    If you look at the history of the case, just prior to this documents were filed informing the court that the parties reached a settlement. This latest order just withdraws the WBTS's petition for review (appeal) that they filed after losing (partially) to Candace. No need for the appeal now since a settlement was reached.
  • The Searcher
    The Searcher
    In other words, the Org's knee-jerk reaction was to file an appeal, but subsequently thought better of it, had a chat with Team Conti, negotiated a confidential settlement, then requested the court to cancel the appeal application on the grounds that a settlement had been reached with the plaintiff.
  • ron rawson
    ron rawson
    I follow as closely as I can, but missed the Borgs appeal (life gets in the way)....geeeeez. Thanks for clearing that up for me.

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit