More doctrine subtle changes in new book.

by Nemesis 9 Replies latest watchtower scandals

  • Nemesis
    Nemesis

    Besides the scandal of the three missing chapters (especially the blood one) that are in the old book "United in Worship of the only true God". (1983) And are clearly missing from the new book: "Worship the only true God."

    1. I make a covenant with you for a Kingdom. (Chapter 14)

    2. What the Mosaic Law means to you. (Chapter 19)

    3. Life and Blood - Do you treat then as sacred? (Chapter 20)

    Some other interesting missing bits I have noticed are:

    Page 28 (of the old book), this question is missing in the new book, along with the rest of section 4, and the whole of section 5:

    " Does counsel on conduct written to anointed Christians apply to persons who have hope of eternal life on earth ?" (Page 28, old book)

    I found this also by accident on page 180 (in the old book), has been altered in the new book (page 179) The bits in bold blue have been deleted!

    8 After World War I there was, indeed, a great separating of all persons who claimed to be Christians into two classes: (1) The clergy of Christendom and their followers, who came out in strong support of the League of Nations (now the United Nations), while still holding fast to their nationalism. (2) The relatively few true anointed Christians of that postwar era, who gave their full support to God's Messianic Kingdom. By open support of governments of the world as the means for achieving peace and security, the first class made it plain that they were not true Christians. (John 17:16) In contrast, Jehovah's servants correctly identified the League of Nations as the modern-day "disgusting thing that causes desolation," referred to in Matthew 24:15. Showing themselves to be true "sons of [God's] kingdom," they undertook the preaching of "this good news of the kingdom . . . in all the inhabited earth." (Matt. 24:14) With what results?

    Note the missing " few anointed ", and " United Nations " support comments!

    I'm sure there are many more changes; maybe others have found some more changes?

    Nemesis

  • larc
    larc

    Thanks for the detail. Regarding the League of Nations, I doubt that they will ever admit that Russell supported and praised it. I don't have the reference handy, but I can find it later, if anyone is interested.

  • minimus
    minimus

    So to understand it, what do you think the new book is trying to say? I've read on threads what is deleted but I would like to get feedback on what you think the Society is ultimately trying to say.

  • ItsJustlittleoldme
    ItsJustlittleoldme

    By open support of governments of the world as the means for achieving peace and security, the first class made it plain that they were not true Christians. (John 17:16) In contrast, Jehovah's servants correctly identified the League of Nations as the modern-day "disgusting thing that causes desolation," referred to in Matthew 24:15. Showing themselves to be true "sons of [God's] kingdom

    Quick, someone check, maybe they want their "library" card back <ROFL>

  • ItsJustlittleoldme
    ItsJustlittleoldme

    Oh, just a quick note.. Interesting that the removal of stuff here will be classified as new light !!!

    They take stuff out of the book, regergitate it, and present it as the current light, when all they really did was subtract from their light.. !!! (Well, they always do that, but usually they present some other lunitic doctrine to take it's place -- here they are just removing light by omission)

    The light gets smaller and smaller all the time.................

  • hillary_step
    hillary_step

    Hello,

    In contrast, Jehovah's servants correctly identified the League of Nations as the modern-day "disgusting thing that causes desolation," referred to in Matthew 24:15.

    What makes this statement extremely misleading on the one hand and hilarious on the other, is that the League Of Nations was originally identified as the "The modern-day "disgusting thing that causes desolation" almost ten years before the WTS had even thought of this identification, by somebody else not even affiliated to the WTS.

    W. E. Vine, of Brethren fame, was the first one interpret this passage in Revelation in such a manner. He was also a prime proponent of the invisible visitation of Christ as King and the WTS almost exlusively uses his defence of the mistranslation of the Koine Greek 'parousia' to prop up their inherited theology.

    I have yet to unearth any 'discovery' of the WTS that was not discovered, and usually abandoned, by somebody before them.

    As scholars they are the classroom joke. Send them in the corner with their dunces hat on again.

    HS

    Edited by - hillary_step on 13 July 2002 20:49:9

  • Golden Girl
    Golden Girl

    Verily interesting...Grasshopper!!!!!!!!

    (Thanks!)

    Golden Girl

    (Expecting a copy of book from JW Mother in law any time now!)

  • winsome
    winsome

    This is amazing information!

    Interestingly, "bibleexaminer" some time ago made some very insightful comments on possible changes ahead for the JW organization on this very same topic. The thread was entitled "Change In WTS Doctrine Underway". I posted some of the information below.

    I had decided some time ago to go back and research the United Nations and comments made on this discussion board in the past. Here is what I found. After reading this section quoted, I think you will agree with me, the "changes" suggested in the new book, are consistent with suggestions mentioned in his post over a year ago. I think, its a good chance this startling information about the United Nations could very well have been the real purpose (along with changes on blood, the "anointed", etc.) for the much publicized October 8th, 2001 Meeting by the Governing Body, that strangely fizzled out at the last minute. The post below has to do with a certain talk given by a Circuit Overseer who in his talk shows Matthew 24 and modern-day applications about the United Nations Organization DO NOT fulfill bible prophecy today, nor fit into a modern day setting. These are significant changes of thought not heard before by JWs. (Please analyze.)

    After reading this, you may agree with me in saying that maybe, just maybe the Governing Body really had something significant to tell us afterall at the big October 2001 Meeting. Something that might finally, actually "explain" their secret NGO status with the United Nations Organization for the past 10 years. But, as things would happen, someone "spilled the beans" a little early before they could officially present the information. (Some may remember, the former District Overseer "Maximus" all but stated there was to be presented "unforgetable", startling information that was to be given at the big October meeting.) So what you read in the new book may represent those changes. This may be it. But before the meeting could come off, the so-called apostates "stole their thunder" and "leaked" the UN Affair to the press and the Guardian ran the article before the meeting could get under way. The public and JW reaction was so bad, it would have been difficult to present this information with everything in an uproar. Thus the Governing Body, under advisement from Bethel Cronies created the "library card" defense. Only to have the "change" on the United Nations information to be revisited at a later time via printed books and so on. But on a gradual basis, like slow cooking a frog.

    I think the information posted below supports my "take" on these mysterious, covert events. This was posted August 11, 2001, a couple months before the big meeting in October of 2001.

    http://www.jehovahs-witness.com/forum/thread.asp?id=9882&site=3

    Excerpt from thread: "Change In WTS Doctrine Underway" by bibleexaminer.

    *****************************snip*********************************

    The Discussion

    Recently, a Circuit Overseer has been giving a talk that involves certain verses in Matthew chapter 24. What he is preaching, one can be absolutely sure, is sanctioned by the Watchtower proper. Why it's important takes a few more paragraphs to explain because one must first have in mind the Watchtower's position up till this point. And to understand why this particular change is so significant also takes a few paragraphs. Yet this read should be rewarding.

    The material I choose so to make the point is the Watchtower article of May 1, 1999 pages 14-20, where we find a few important points which find even more significance when taken in context with the recent sermons given by certain CO's.

    The Watchtower is full of allegories. If the reader was ever associated with the Org, then the significance of Matthew 24:45 and the allegories invented by the Watchtower relative to this verse are plain. It is the single most important verse in the whole Bible for JW's. The entire authority structure of the Governing Body rests here. It is the "sacred cow" of the Watchtower. Therefore, any changes in doctrine relative to Matthew chapter 24 will have lasting effects on the Watchtower organization.

    At Matthew 24:15-16 we read in the NWT

    *** Rbi8 Matthew 24:15-16 ***
    15 Therefore, when YOU catch sight of the disgusting thing that causes desolation, as spoken of through Daniel the prophet, standing in a holy place, (let the reader use discernment,) 16 then let those in Jude'a begin fleeing to the mountains.

    The Watchtower allegory that relates to these verses states that "the first fulfillment involved the Roman assault on Jerusalem and its temple" (Note: all quotes are from the w99 5/1 14-20) This article goes on to say that "It is apparent that Jesus was referring to the Roman army that would come"

    Therefore, the Roman army was represented by the "disgusting thing that causes desolation" in this supposed "first" fulfillment and it's "standing in a holy place" was a prophecy concerning the time when the Roman army would undermine the wall in 66CE and Roman soldiers, Gentiles, would enter the Temple grounds.

    Christians then would recognize this "sign" and when the Roman army retreated, they would take the opportunity to "begin fleeing to the mountains".

    This is all well and good, and for a fact is a matter of history now. But the Watchtower does not leave it there. They insist, and have for many years, that this was only the "first" fulfillment, and the article goes on to say

    "Since World War I, we have seen the larger fulfillment of Jesus sign recorded in Matthew chapter 24. Yet, recall his words: When you catch sight of the disgusting thing that causes desolation . . . standing in a holy place, . . . then let those in Judea begin fleeing to the mountains. (Matthew 24:15, 16) This aspect of the prophecy must have a fulfillment in our time too."

    They warn us that "OUR being alerted to an approaching calamity can enable us to avoid it."
    Ohhh, we had better tune in!

    The article further points out the characters in the Watchtower allegory when it says

    "So in 1919 the disgusting thing appeared. In time, the League gave way to the United Nations. Jehovahs Witnesses have long exposed these human peace organizations as disgusting in Gods sight."

    So, where in the "first" fulfillment, the "disgusting thing" was the Roman army, in this supposed "greater" or second fulfillment, the "disgusting thing" becomes the United Nations Organization.

    But who then, in this "second" fulfillment, is represented by "Judea", the Jewish nation that was conquered with it's "holy place"? The article then relates

    "On Thursday, July 10, 1969, at the Peace on Earth International Assembly in New York City, F. W. Franz, then vice president of the Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society, gave a significantly adjusted explanation" of the outworkings of these events. "The great tribulation such as will not occur again is yet ahead, for it means the destruction of the world empire of false religion (including Christendom) followed by the war of the great day of God the Almighty at Armageddon"

    So then, the Watchtower allegory teaches that soon, very, very soon, the "disgusting thing" in the person of the United Nations Organization will stand in the modern-day "holy place" in the person of all religions of the earth, bar the Watchtower headquarters obviously, at which time it will be necessary for all good Jehovah's Witnesses to "begin fleeing to the mountains".

    Interesting, then, isn't it, that

    "As first-century followers of Christ must have keenly watched to see how the standing in a holy place would develop, so do present-day [Jehovah's Witnesses]."

    Now does it make any sense at all, that Jehovah's Witnesses need to watch for an event where the UN goes to church, so that they know when to flee? FLEE WHAT? They are not in church are they?

    16 Since the start of the great tribulation is yet future, is the standing in a holy place still ahead of us? Evidently so. While the disgusting thing made its appearance early in this century and has, thus, existed for decades, it will take a position in a unique way in a holy place in the near future.

    Doesn't make much sense, not to us, and obviously not to them either, for they go on to say " We cannot presently have full details about the great tribulation," and "Admittedly, we will have to wait for the actual fulfillment to know all the details."

    Well, this is a convenient "out" for the Watchtower, with regard to this self contradictory allegory. Who can explain such nonsense? The article says

    "So the disgusting thing that causes desolation, which has existed since 1919, apparently is yet to stand in a holy place. How will this happen? And how can we be affected?" Yes Watchtower tell us, how can we be affected?

    The watchtower explains

    "Details supplied in the prophecy help us to identify this symbolic beast as a peace organization now the United Nations. Revelation 17:16, 17 shows that God will yet put it into the hearts of certain human rulers who are prominent in this beast to desolate the world empire of false religion. That attack marks the outbreak of the great tribulation."

    That's all they have to offer in the way of explanation. I wonder how many letters the Watchtower received asking their "channel" how in the hell the UN's standing in say, the vatican, will be reason for JWs to flee. And flee from what? Supposedly JWs have already "fled" from the supposed modern-day counterpart of Judea/Jewry. As the article says

    "We have for many decades been urging people to get out of false religion and to take up true worship."and "continue to maintain a clear distinction between themselves and false religious organizations."

    What the hell does it matter to JWs that the UN is going to enter the Churches etc and axe them? If we aren't there, then we're just bystanders. As the aarticle says "After all, obedient Christians will not be punished when destruction comes on false religion and the rest of this wicked system."
    Why worry then? Why do JWs need to "be discerning and heed the warning about the disgusting thing standing in a holy place. And they will act decisively on their unshakable faith."? WHY?

    And how many asked our dear GB deskboyz, "If the Church is the "Holy Place" where the UN will stand, why have we all prematurely fled?" Did not Jesus say that "when you seeTHEN.." AND, if it's a "holy place" why did the Watchtower make us all flee it before our Lord directed?

    So, it's no wonder that the Watchtower is going to change this self-contradictory nonsense by way of sermons given by COs instead of announcing it outright by way of their "channel" journal the Watchtower magazine. After the COs have made their rounds and given "new light" to congregations on a one-at -a-time basis, then the Watchtower can safely discuss Matthew chapter 24 with their new doctrine, and nobody will notice.So they thought!

    The CO is giving a talk that in summary says that the allegory of so many years is now GONE. He is teaching that there is no "second" and "greater" fulfillment of Matthew 24:15-16 but that it was fulfilled in complete in the first century, and only upon Jewry.

    Well. Like thinking minds didn't know that! The problem is, this doctrine was fundamental to their "sacred cow" dicta of Matthew 24:45 and the further allegorizing of the Watchtower. The Watchtower is slowly dismantling their power base by altering long held doctrine which is fundamentally important to their power base.

    Time will tell, but this cannot last.

    ****************************snip********************************

    What do you think?

    winsome

    Edited by - winsome on 14 July 2002 11:10:32

  • ronin1
    ronin1

    Hi Minimus:

    This is my take on why they deleted the following chapters:

    "I make a Covenant with you for a Kingdom"-

    I believe the WTS can no longer support their 144,000 doctrine and that only JW's belong in that number. Nor can they really state how many are left of the "anointed" here on earth.

    "What the Mosiac Law Means to You"-

    They (WTS) have "flipped/flopped" so much on their teaching Bible principles regarding military and compulsorary service, that they had to delete this chapter.

    "Life and Blood-Do you treat them as sacred?"-

    They (WTS) having changed their doctrine so-----many times on the blood transfusion issues (cannot take blood, can take some blood components, telling government authorities they do not punish persons in their organization if they do take blood transfusions, actually punishing persons in their organization for taking blood transfusions, plain out telling lies......) that the only thing they could legally do was to delete that chapter.

    That's my partial take on it. I still have to go over the entire book.

    Ronin1

  • minimus
    minimus

    Hi Ronin, why would the chapter on the mosaic law have anything to do with military service?

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit