Baltimore Silentlambs speak up!

by Nathan Natas 7 Replies latest watchtower scandals

  • Nathan Natas
    Nathan Natas

    link: http://www.sunspot.net/news/local/bal-jehovahs21.story?coll=bal%2Dhome%2Dheadlines

    Women accuse another church of past abuse
    Former Jehovah’s Witness leader to be tried on sex offenses, attempted rape; Congregation is in Chase; 3 accusers, now 29 to 31, claim incidents occurred between 1974 and 1984
    ----------
    By Dennis O'Brien
    Sun Staff
    Originally published May 20, 2002, 9:40 PM EDT

    In a case similar to those troubling the Archdiocese of Baltimore, police have charged a former leader of a Jehovah's Witness congregation in Chase with sexually abusing three women who say the congregation discouraged them from reporting the abuse and shunned them when they spoke out about it.
    David R. Shumaker, 39, of Felton, Pa., will be tried July 15 in Baltimore County Circuit Court on several sex offense counts and one count of attempted rape in a series of incidents that allegedly occurred between 1974 and 1984, when the women were child and teen-age members of the Jehovah's Witness congregation and Shumaker was a ministerial servant, according to papers in Circuit Court.

    Shumaker's lawyer, Michael Pate, declined to comment Monday.

    Assistant State's Attorney Kevin Barth, the prosecutor assigned to the case, also declined to comment.

    But in court papers, county police charge Shumaker with repeatedly molesting one of the women and performing oral sex on another at his father's house in the 11000 block of Raphael Road in Kingsville between 1976 and 1984.

    Shumaker, whose father is a longtime member of the congregation and is now an elder who oversees church matters, also is accused of improperly touching a third woman while they were swimming and tubing on the Little Gunpowder Falls near Philadelphia Road in the mid-1970s.

    "I would tell him that I was going to tell," one woman is quoted as telling police in a four- page statement of charges. "He would twist my arm and tell me that no one would believe me, and that I liked it."

    The Sun does not identify alleged victims of sexual abuse.

    One of the women said in an interview Monday that when she and the others reported the abuse in the mid- 1980s, the church's all-male group of elders refused to believe them and banished them from the congregation.

    All three women, who now range in age from 29 to 31, have quit the church, she said, after years of being ostracized by the congregation and its members for making the allegations.

    "They had this rule that you need a corroborating witness," said the woman, 30, who lives in Harford County. "How are you going to have a witness to sex abuse? It was like no one wanted to believe us."

    Bill Bowen, a former Jehovah's Witness elder from Benton, Ky., who has been studying how the church handles abuse complaints for several years, said his research shows the women's experience is fairly common. <

    Members of the close-knit organization, known for its door- to-door evangelism, are encouraged to report abuse to congregation elders first, Bowen said.

    If elders determine that abuse has taken place, their first call is to the church's legal department at its headquarters in Brooklyn, N.Y., he said. The lawyers then decide whether to report it to authorities, Bowen said.

    "They're worried about getting sued," he said.

    Bowen said that the church holds tremendous power over its members, and being asked to leave the church is like being "stoned to death spiritually. They have an absolute ironclad hold over their membership and they control their lives."

    When the women made the allegations, all three were banished, and no church member was allowed contact.

    David Semonian, a spokesman for the church at its Brooklyn headquarters, said that when a member comes forward with an accusation of abuse, two elders meet with the accuser and then with the accused to see if the complaint is valid.

    "We do look for some corrobo rating evidence," he said. "The Bible directs that no single witness should rise up against any man."

    Semonian said that he is unsure what policies the Jehovah's Witnesses followed when the women complained in the 1980s, but he said the church has be come "very aggressive" in protecting children from abuse.

    "Jehovah's Witnesses do not discourage anyone from reporting child abuse or sex abuse to the authorities," Semonian said. "We would not do that. The Christian congregation does not take the place of the civil authorities."

    Bowen said that members convicted of child abuse are sometimes later sent out for door-to-door proselytizing.

    "That's just what I want -- a child abuser knocking on my door," he said.

    But Semonian said that anyone guilty of molestation is barred from holding positions of responsibility and that if he is sent door-to-door, he is not al lowed to have any unsupervised contact with children.

    Semonian said that dismissal of a member is a last resort for those who become a danger to the church.

    "It's not that we're kicking someone out," he said. "It's an arrangement by God to keep the congregation from harmful in fluences."

    Copyright © 2002, The Baltimore Sun

  • Pathofthorns
    Pathofthorns
    Semonian said that he is unsure what policies the Jehovah's Witnesses followed when the women complained in the 1980s, but he said the church has be come "very aggressive" in protecting children from abuse.

    Interesting comment about being "unsure" of the past policies. A very good article overall and good for the ladies who have pursued this matter.

    Path

  • NameWithheld
    NameWithheld

    Every time a JW gets backed into a corner, they become 'unsure' of the past. Just like the WTBTS was 'unsure' of the requirements for being registered with the DPI at the UN in 1991 - playing as if there was a change ... They sure do have bad memories!

  • ChiChiMama
    ChiChiMama

    excellent article!

    What a crock of **** about him not being sure which policies were being followed back then.And what a COPOUT!
    The records are right under his nose.
    He just doesn't want to know and he surly doesn't want the public to know.

    ChiChi

  • Nanoprobe
    Nanoprobe

    David Semonian uses the term “aggressive policy for the protection of children”. How would WBTS define this term?

    a)Your children are safe within the organization
    b)WBTS bullies parents who report, excommunicates whistleblowers, that’s pretty aggressive isn’t it?
    c)None of the above. It was a mis-quote the actual statement was “aggressive policy for the protection of pedophiles”.

  • D wiltshire
    D wiltshire

    Double-speak alert!!!!

    , but he said the church has be come "very aggressive" in protecting children from abuse.

    "Very agressive" can mean almost anything. Let him be more accurate and explain in detail Just what "very aggressive" really means. Give us facts not generalities.

    Join the Watchtower or you will die.
    Only Jehovah's Witnesses have the TRUTH all other religions EVIL and from the Devil.
    You must beleive the Watchtower or you're going to die a painful death forever, isn't that really GOOD NEWS?
  • Cappuccino OC
    Cappuccino OC

    Knowing the organization anyone who speaks with the truth will be disfellowshiped. They do not want any bad publicity against them or dirtying Jehovahs, or the organization. I have first account experience with them. My little sis was abused by her father and he was only disfellowshiped. We were told we could not go to the authorities because this would bring reproach on Jehovah. Now I wonder how many more children have fallen victim of abuse/molestation and rape by my stepfather. I heard there are new allegations against him where he lives that he molested a 13 year old girl. I hope that he goes to prison for all his wickedness. The elder that headed the committee in 1994 was also disfellowshiped for abusing his oldest daughter two years ago in 2000.

  • Mamacat
    Mamacat

    I know I am late on this one, I just found this site because of this news story! Hit a little too close to home for me. This happened at the congregation that shares a hall with the cong. my mom took me too as a child. She still attends.

    She told me that the news cameras were outside the hall to film footage of it when she was meeting for field service. The elder present told them not to talk to any media...didn't mention what was going on to anyone there.

    That night at the meeting, she said that a witness made a comment as to how *the way these young girls dress* and the others agreed with him. Well, one girl was 5 when it happened and another was 8 when the abuse started.

    The man's dad, an elder in the congregation to this day, spoke to the news media. He said his son (the above accused) said it was all lies. Then in the next sentence said that it was already taken care of by the elders years ago and that he has total faith in the organization.

    [link] http://www.thewbalchannel.com/news/1471369/detail.html[/link]

    ~*Cat*~

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit