How can one explain to a court system that getting confirmed as a Catholic is not the same as getting baptized as a Jehovahs Witness.
The court system seems to be under the belief that many children get confirmed around the age of 12 and that a child should have the right to make the decision to get baptized a JW at that age as well.
My arguement is that if you want to leave the catholic church at a later date or commit a serious sin you are not shunned or excommunicated.
Looking for something to show the court that using confirmation as a comparison to determine the age at which a child should make this decision is not the same since JW baptism is life altering.
Seems like therapists also don't understand or see the big deal with letting the kids get baptized if they want to.